The insignificant result of the meeting of NATO foreign ministers in Brussels focused on the war in Ukraine

according to the report of the international group Tasnim news agency, Tagus newspaper In an article, Shaw discussed the meeting of NATO foreign ministers in Brussels with the focus on Ukraine and wrote: The result of this meeting was very simple and unglamorous. There was no clear commitment to Ukraine, and Sweden’s accession to NATO remained unclear. Hopes are on the NATO-Ukraine Council, which will hold a meeting on Wednesday. – No new billions of aid for Ukraine, no new military packages to support this country in the winter, and therefore, after the first day of this meeting, Jens Stoltenberg, the Secretary General of NATO, had only one small result to announce: “At our meeting today, Members showed their determination to support Ukraine on the NATO path.”

And of course, this comment probably doesn’t even apply to everyone: Turkey and Hungary have not yet been able to finally agree to join Sweden. So how do they do it in the case of Ukraine?

The fact that Sweden because of the position of Viktor Orbán, Hungarian Prime Minister and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Turkey’s president is not yet a full member of NATO, angering many foreign ministers. French Catherine Colonna spoke about the damage to the alliance and NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg announced: I expect the parliament to finish its discussion and agree to this issue as soon as possible.

But for how long and how much It will primarily depend on the outcome of the elections in the United States next year. If the Republicans with Donald Trump win this election, the aid will probably decrease. Now the Americans are responsible for about half of the military aid to Ukraine. Considering its budget problems, Germany will reduce its support for Ukraine or not. Baerbok assured: We will not reduce under any circumstances and we will fulfill our commitments, and we have even increased them to eight billion euros. German Foreign Minister said: Peace in Ukraine is a guarantee for peace in Europe.

But this country is far from peace in Ukraine. Winter is approaching, the offensive is making no progress, the promised munitions are not coming from Europe, and the infrastructure is at great risk. The NATO foreign ministers will talk about all this with the foreign minister of Ukraine.

The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung newspaper also mentioned the meeting of the NATO foreign ministers in Brussels and wrote : The military stalemate has led to the fact that the West now considers only the maintenance of the front to be the success of Ukraine. This is realistic, but Kiev still needs to be supported.

The author went on to write that due to the current situation, NATO is reducing the level of its targets in Ukraine. . In the meantime, the change in global developments has also added to this issue. The war in the Middle East has not only turned the West’s attention to another major scene, but has also shown the leading Western power in particular that its forces are not materially, for example, when Israel and Ukraine need the same ammunition, nor politically. When there is partisan conflict in Washington, they are not infinite. Even if the US Congress agrees on new money for Ukraine in the near future, it should become a question mark in the medium term of US support for this country.

Continued This article reads: “It is not clear at this time where all this will lead. Until Ukraine surrenders, we must continue to support it.” It is in our interest that Putin does not go further west. Germany cannot shoulder this burden alone, especially if America’s share is reduced. In this situation, the French president talks a lot about the “strategic autonomy” of Europe.

end of message/