Britain is suspending human rights rules to advance its anti-immigration agenda
The British government has openly admitted that it wants to suspend the rules of human rights in order to advance its anti-immigration programs, and the British immigration minister also resigned during these debates. |
According to the report of the international group Tasnim news agency quoting The British government has openly admitted it wants to suspend human rights because of its deportation plans, according to the publication “Day Site”. British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak wants to ensure that the plan does not stop. to stop his controversial move to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda.
Conservative Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said a new bill would specify that key parts of the Bill of Rights The British Charter of Human Rights cannot be applied to Rwanda. This will ensure that our (anti-immigration) plan does not stop, Sonak said.
The planned legislation aims to declare Rwanda a safe third country. . The British government wants to immediately send asylum seekers who enter the country irregularly, regardless of their origin, to the East African country. They have to apply for asylum there and it is not possible to return to the UK.
London’s highest court also stopped this project citing constitutional deficit in Rwanda. But the government, with its plans for the new law, believes that it can overcome these limitations. England made a lot of noise on the first page of the draft of this plan. It said he could not say whether the law was compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. The conservative right wing wants Britain to withdraw from the convention so that international courts can no longer stop the plan.
James Cleverly traveled to Rwanda on Tuesday to discuss a new deportation agreement. to sign with the government there. This law stipulates that British refugees must wait for a decision on their asylum application in Rwanda in the future.
Human rights activists and some politicians are clearly critical of this issue. they did Brussels migration researcher Camille Le Couse said the deal once again relies on deterrence. The question now is whether this mechanism will be implemented or will end up in court again.
Amnesty International also said that the London government is persisting with the irresponsible policy of outsourcing asylum applications. he does. This human rights organization stated: The tragic political fantasy that Rwanda can simply take these people from England is highly immoral, completely unworkable and sets a terrible example on the world stage.
Resignation of the British Immigration Minister
“Robert Genrick”, the British Immigration Minister, also resigned due to the controversy over the tightening of his country’s asylum policy. According to Robert Genrick, who is actually one of the confidants of Rishi Sunak, the British Prime Minister, the draft law by which Sunak wanted to implement a controversial refugee agreement with Rwanda did not go far enough.
Generic’s resignation came shortly after it was announced that the British government would have to ignore international law to reach a deal with Rwanda.
Jenrik explained his decision on the X network: I cannot continue in my position when I clearly disagree with the direction of the government’s immigration policy.
On the eve of the elections in England, the conservatives, who have become extremely unpopular among the people, are now trying to fulfill their anti-immigration promises and circumvent the decision of the British Supreme Court to reach an anti-immigration agreement. conclude a new agreement with Rwanda. “Rishi Sunak”, the British Prime Minister, even after the Supreme Court’s negative decision on the plan to deport refugees to Rwanda, announced that he did not hesitate. and to implement this policy, he will conclude a new agreement with this country with an emergency law. Rwanda is illegal regardless of their origin. The Supreme Court argued that there was a risk that asylum seekers in the East African country would not receive a fair trial and be deported to their home countries despite having a legal claim to asylum.
As such, Britain wants to distance itself from migrants with much tougher barriers to skilled foreign workers and a new asylum deal for deportations to Rwanda. British Home Secretary James Cleverly signed an agreement in this East African country with which the conservative government wants to bypass the British Supreme Court ruling.
Publisher | Tasnim News |