Differences in the core of the political and military power of the Zionist regime

Fars News Agency International Group – Guest Note: Benjamin Netanyahu decided to resume airstrikes on Gaza despite the political, economic and prestige costs, because this war without achievements such as the release of hostages and the dissolution of Hamas is not only death It will be his politics, but it is a deep blow to the Likud party as the pillar of Israel’s right-wing movement.

For this reason, within the Likud party, there are signs of the formation of opposition to Netanyahu, which is the most important. Its crystallization is the confrontation between Yoav Galant, the regime’s war minister, and Netanyahu, who has served as a minister in the past and is now a member of the political committee of the Likud party. During the elections of recent years, it has happened many times, but the unprecedented issue is the dispute between the Prime Minister and the Minister of War, who are considered the central focus of power in the midst of the existential battle for Israel.

This difference crystallized in the media when Gallant agreed to hold a joint press conference with Netanyahu. This issue even became a topic for journalists and they asked the prime minister of the regime about it. Netanyahu admitted that he proposed this to the Minister of War, but he did not accept it.

Two hypotheses can be considered about the reason for this difference; The first hypothesis refers to the difference between the political institutions and the military, which was discussed in the internal circles of the Zionist regime before the ground operation began, because the regime’s army had reservations about entering Gaza by land. But the political staff of the government ignored this.

It seems that this difference of opinion has once again manifested itself in the confrontation between Gallant and Netanyahu, because the prime minister of the regime and other ministers from the radical Jewish parties who They lack field military experience, they don’t consider the risks of the ground battle in Gaza, and they have pressured the army to achieve immediate success (with political and media wins).

The second hypothesis of this Although the main commanders of the army are against the political pressure to achieve ground gains in Gaza and consider it impractical, this is not Gallant’s problem with Netanyahu. The Minister of War of the Zionist regime is not interested in tying his political fate with Netanyahu and considers the resumption of air and ground attacks on Gaza without freeing more prisoners to be a game on his land.

It seems that the hypothesis The second is more serious for three reasons; First of all, Gallant found that Netanyahu refused to continue the process of freeing the prisoners (10 vs. 30) because he understood that with the continuation of the ceasefire, he would be under more internal and external pressure, and now the lives of these prisoners are at risk because of Netanyahu’s interests. /p>

Secondly, the political credibility of the Prime Minister of the Zionist regime in the eyes of the intelligence agencies and the regime’s military has been severely damaged as a result of the recent attack, which was partly as a result of the political crisis before the Al-Aqsa storm, and partly It was because of Netanyahu’s mistake in being deceived by Yahya Senvar.

Netanyahu thought that Hamas would not violate the ceasefire after Saif al-Quds and even ignored intelligence reports in this regard. This fatal mistake and accusing the intelligence agencies of weakness in this matter has led to Netanyahu’s deep discredit in the Israeli power pyramid, and basically the life of a politician who does not have the support of the military is over.

The third reason that has shaken Netanyahu’s position in the eyes of Gallant is the opposition of the Americans to the resumption of attacks on Gaza at this time, and it seems that even the Minister of War is looking for independent contact channels with the Americans to bypass the Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of the Zionist regime. Is. In this regard, the news about Gallant’s meeting with Anthony Blinken outside the office of the Israeli Ministry of War can be evaluated, and it is not far from the expectation that the Americans will develop their political plans for the future of Gaza and Palestine from parallel paths with the Prime Minister’s Office and the Foreign Ministry of the regime. move forward.

There is no doubt that the internal political atmosphere of the Zionist regime will not return to the way it was before after the Al-Aqsa storm and the internal differences in this regime will continue more than before.

Benyamin Netanyahu, who a year ago after winning the elections and winning 65 seats, hoped like the President of Turkey to be able to change the political system of the Zionist regime from a parliamentary to a presidential system through constitutional amendments. and increase his political authority; Today, he is in decline, so that the ministers in his cabinet are disobeying and bypassing him.

end of message/