Get News Fast
Supporting the oppressed and war-torn people of Gaza and Lebanon

What should I do in Tel Aviv?

There are serious differences among the top commanders of the Zionist regime about the future of the war, and these differences have continued within the cabinet as well.

Fars News Agency International Group – Guest note: The Zionist regime has been crushing the Gaza Strip with the strongest possible force for more than a hundred days. These attacks have resulted in the massacre of more than 24 thousand people, but yesterday, in an unexpected move and in the shadow of media silence, the armored units of the regime withdrew from northern Gaza. This is while the north of Gaza became the slaughterhouse of the Golani brigade and their tanks did not go anywhere, and the Zionists did not succeed in the Khan Yunis front in the south of Gaza.

Many reasons can be listed for this field failure of the Zionist regime, but from many points of view, differences in the security cabinet and the political cabinet are the main reason for the weakness and confusion of the Israeli army in the war. For example, on the one hand, within the security cabinet, Gantz, the former war minister, has a disagreement with Yoaf Gallant, the current war minister, about the general strategy of the war, because Gantz believes that the priority should be the operation to free the hostages, and to save their lives, one should take courageous steps. This is while Gallant insists that the attacks (especially air strikes) should not be stopped under the pretext of negotiations with Hamas and the pressure should be continued. He emphasized Gallant’s position regarding the support of prisoners that Gadi Eisenkot, the former Minister of War, who is a member of the Security Cabinet, agrees with Gantz and made harsh verbal attacks in the recent meeting. He called the current battle method blind and demanded to stop lying and find new methods, which was expressed in support of Gantz’s opinion. But the bigger difference within the cabinet is between Benjamin Netanyahu. And Gallant is in the context of the post-war political landscape. While Gallant unveiled the 4-axis plan two weeks ago, the basis of which is the creation of a buffer zone and the division of Gaza into three regions (the same as the West Bank), during which the administration of civilian-security affairs will be handed over to a coalition of Arab countries.

On the other hand, Netanyahu is looking for a plan to move Palestinians to Rwanda and is against handing over affairs to Arab countries with a plan similar to Oslo in which Gaza has local autonomy. Netanyahu is interested in handing over the affairs to Mohammad Dahlan Mehre of the Emirates in Gaza, although this plan is not popular among Arab countries (Egypt and Saudi Arabia) and they like Gallant’s plan, although no official reaction has been published in this regard so far. /p>

In the meantime, it is said that although Gallant is against stopping the war with Gaza in order to advance political negotiations with Hamas for the release of the hostages, he is interested in moving from the Gaza front to the Lebanon front as soon as possible. be inclined Therefore, within the framework of his 4-axis plan, air attacks on Gaza will continue in a targeted manner, but the focus of attacks on southern Lebanon will be intensified for more serious attacks on Hezbollah.

The third area of ​​disagreements Political and military related to the serious disagreements of the radical Jewish faction (Ben Guer, Smutrich and M. Salem) with the government, because these parties, who are also members of the government, want the continuation of the ground military presence in Gaza and at the same time strong operations near Lebanon. On the other hand, Gallant and Herzi Halloy are not in favor of this plan due to the high casualties of the soldiers in Gaza, the differences have increased so much that Halloy has boycotted the cabinet meetings. Gower, Smotrich and M. Salem intensified after Shaul Mofaz, the former minister of war (from the leftist parties), was appointed by him as the head of the truth-seeking committee on October 7. The members of the government, while opposing Mofaz due to his political background, stressed that he should not This fact-finding committee should address the government and be limited to the military, and the verbal conflict in the cabinet rose to such an extent that the prime minister interrupted the meeting halfway through.

These political and military differences while According to the Zionist sources, there is still no prospect for peace at the current time, and the plans of the Qataris and Egyptians have not completely attracted the attention of Tel Aviv. Of course, media sources in the Arab world claim that Israel is interested in proposing a peace plan from Qatar, based on which Hamas leaders will leave the region in exchange for stopping the attacks on Gaza.

end of message


 

publisher Fars News
  • By joining the following social networks, you can quickly access the latest news in categories related to this news and other world news.
  • English News :
  • It is possible to intelligently receive news on personal or public channels and display it to contacts on social networks, Bale – Telegram – Instagram – Facebook – X (Twitter). Please call to receive the robot.
  • support :         |       
free zones of Iran, heaven for investment | 741 investment packages in Iran's free zones | With a capacity of over 158 billion dollars Safe investment in the Islamic Republic of Iran

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

six + four =

Back to top button