Two countries should not be included in one Palestinian land

Fars News Agency International Group – Analytical Note: One hundred and ten days have passed since Israel’s war against Gaza; Nearly 100,000 people have been killed and injured (more than 30,000 martyrs and 70,000 injured) and the US, while declaring its opposition to a permanent ceasefire, says that the solution for Israel is to accept the state of Palestine, or so to speak, a two-state solution.

Last November (December) was the anniversary of Resolution 181 of the United Nations General Assembly, which in 1947 divided the “Palestinian Land” into two pieces and assigned 56% of it to the name of the Jews and to the “Zionist invaders”. ; 56% of the occupied area after the past 76 years has reached more than 80% of the total territory of Palestine. Relinquish 56% of its own land and accept the existence of Israel and resolve the Israeli-Palestinian war by agreeing to the formation of two countries in the Palestinian land; However, the same resolution does not accept anything called a Palestinian state and reduces the issue to the issue of refugees. The Oslo Agreement (1993), which was a symbol of the diplomatic solution to resolve the conflict, became only a practical achievement for Israel because the Palestine Liberation Organization headed by Yasser Arafat recognized the existence of Israel, but on the other hand, the existence of something called the State of Palestine in The limit for the formation of a disarmed self-governing government overnight was reduced and Arafat agreed to give up 78% of the Palestinian territory in the hope of the promise that Israel would withdraw from the West Bank and the Gaza Strip within five years.

30 years have passed since the Oslo agreement. Not only has Israel not accepted the concept of a Palestinian state, but it has increased 78% of the occupied land to 85% through settlement construction in the West Bank, and today the right-wing Zionists in Israel say that all of Israel’s problems, including the October 7 disaster, started with the Oslo Accords and Israel He should not have left Gaza at all.

This week, Benjamin Netanyahu announced that he never accepted the two-state solution and he is the only one who has stood up to this issue in recent years. Is. It is true that the Palestinian resistance does not recognize the existence of Israel, but before that, it is Israel that has not accepted the concept of a Palestinian state until today. The Gaza war raises the two-state issue as a solution to ensure Israel’s security, not a solution to the rights of the Palestinian people. Anthony Blinken, the foreign minister of Biden, recently during his trip to Cairo, announced the formation of a Palestinian state as the best way to isolate Iran. In mind, it is not the common concept of the country in diplomatic practice. By interfering in the Palestinian nation’s right to self-determination, America says today that Hamas has no place in the future political arrangements of Gaza.

Hamas is the symbol of the resistance of the Palestinian people. When from America’s point of view, resistance has no place in the country of Palestine, that is, a country that is disarmed and is supposed to be under the tutelage of Arab countries economically and under the tutelage of Israel in terms of security. In such a chaotic market, Zalman Shawal, the former ambassador of Israel to the United States (January 23), wrote in a note in Ma’ariv that a Palestinian state that does not recognize Israel means an endless war.

As a result, the promise made by America under the title of “Palestinian State” means a government, not a country, but a disarmed government without security and economic governance. And the Israelis, especially the right-wing ones, do not accept this “scum of the concept of the country” and are not ready to accept such an abstract entity. In such a situation, the position of the Palestinian people and its resistance cannot be examined.

The resistance also does not recognize the existence of Israel, therefore two countries do not fit in the Palestinian land, and history has shown that the occupier of the land, one day will leave it and the resistance over time will return the ownership of the land to the original owner of the land.

end of message/p