What does the initial sentence of the Hague Court against Israel mean?

According to the report of Fars News Agency International Group, the judges of the International Court of Justice issued temporary rulings against Israel as requested by South Africa. In short, this court asked Israel to take all the necessary measures to prevent the genocide in Gaza. Report what he did to the Hague Court. The judge of this court said that the said sentence creates international obligations for Israel.

The chief judge of the International Court of Justice said that at least some of Israel’s actions, which were raised in South Africa’s lawsuit, are examples of violations of the provisions of the UN Genocide Convention.

Among the other important rulings of this court was that it confirmed its jurisdiction to rule in this case against Israel’s request.

▪️ In what fields was the court supposed to decide?
South Africa asked the International Court of Justice to issue a verdict in 9 cases, and among other things, it demanded a halt to Israel’s military operations in Gaza.

Today’s ruling did not address South Africa’s main complaint about whether Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.

In its complaint, South Africa asked the International Court of Justice to announce its opinion on some temporary measures, considering that the issuance of a verdict regarding the genocide may take several years. issue preliminary rulings.

Although the implementation of the judgments of the International Court of Justice by all parties is mandatory, there is no mechanism to guarantee their implementation.

▪️Reactions to the initial sentence of the Hague Court
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of South Africa said in a statement: “Today is a decisive victory for the rule of law at the international level and a turning point in the search for justice for the Palestinian people.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the Hague Tribunal’s decision to hear the case “disgusting” and said that Israel will continue the war until it achieves “complete victory”.

Israel’s allocation indicates that the court has not ruled out the possibility of genocide in Gaza.

South Africa had requested a temporary ceasefire. The court did not issue a ruling in this regard, but required Israel to submit a report.

What does this ruling mean?
“Balkis Jarrah”, one of the legal experts of Human Rights Watch, described the Hague Court’s decision as a “turning point” and said that the meaning of this ruling is that Israel and its allies have received a warning and more measures are needed to prevent genocide and war crimes against the Palestinian people.

He also said that this verdict means that the International Court of Justice has recognized the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza.

Jarrah stated that the orders of this court are “clear and binding” and Israel must now show its commitment to international law and follow these clear orders.

end of message/