Hamas’s reaction to the new plan for a cease-fire: We only accept a permanent cease-fire

According to the report of Fars International News Agency, an American media said that Hamas officials reacted to the new plan proposed at the Paris meeting to establish a ceasefire in Gaza.

At the same time, Hamdan rejected some of the key provisions of this plan, the Associated Press wrote. Hamdan said that Hamas is seeking the release of thousands of Israeli prisoners, including those who have been sentenced to life imprisonment. He named two prisoners whose release Hamas wants. “Marwan Barghouthi” and “Ahmed Saadat”.

Marwan Barghouthi is one of the former commanders of Fatah, who has been sentenced to 5 life imprisonment by Israel. According to the Associated Press, many Palestinians consider Barghouthi to be a revolutionary leader on par with Nelson Mandela or Fidel Castro, whose image has not been affected by the corruption of the Palestinian Authority. It is a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza and Jerusalem. The results of the polls show him as one of the most popular Palestinian leaders.

In an interview with Lebanon’s LBC TV, Hamdan also emphasized that the Palestinian resistance movement demands a permanent ceasefire and a phased approach with several interruptions. does not accept war. “There is no way the resistance is going to accept this,” he said, in comments that likely referred to a week-long ceasefire in the Gaza war in November. We have tried a temporary one, and it has become clear that the Israelis do not respect these pauses and constantly violate them.” They reached an agreement with Hamas on a framework to stop the war and release other Israeli prisoners.

Yesterday (Thursday) a senior Israeli official said that the war cabinet of Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, is waiting for Hamas’s response. It is designed in Paris. NBC News claimed that this plan includes provisions for the exchange of prisoners and a two-month pause in the war. He said: “Everyone is waiting for the reaction of Hamas.”

Before that, a Qatari official had said that establishing a comprehensive ceasefire, the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, providing security for refugees, rebuilding Gaza and The new prisoner exchange operation is one of the provisions of the new plan. On Thursday evening, “Majed bin Mohammad Al-Ansari”, the spokesman of Qatar’s Foreign Ministry, claimed that a proposal was made at the Paris meeting, which was presented to Israel and Hamas. Is. He said: “Right now, we are waiting for the response of Hamas”. Despite this, the realization of both of these goals has come to a dead end.

The New York Times newspaper reported a few days ago that a number of senior commanders of the Israeli army have now come to the conclusion that the simultaneous realization of both The goal is not feasible, and any long-term plan to destroy Hamas will inevitably lead to the death of prisoners.

Furthermore, many analysts, even in occupied Palestine, underestimate the possibility of the complete destruction of Hamas. They have asked “Gadi Eisenkot”, one of the former officials of the Israeli army, who is currently a member of Benjamin Netanyahu’s war cabinet, in an interview a few days ago, described the promises of the Israeli authorities for the complete destruction of Hamas as “storytelling”.

“Ehud Olmert”, the former prime minister of the Zionist regime, also wrote in a note in Haaretz newspaper a few days ago that Netanyahu himself knows that he is not able to eliminate Hamas.

Western analysts say that the Palestinian Islamic resistance movement, Hamas, has survived repeated attempts by the Israeli regime to eliminate itself since its inception. Military and political experts told The New York Times last month that the organization’s structure was designed to withstand plots to destroy it. who has a history of chairing Israel’s Internal Security Council, in an interview with this American newspaper, said that Hamas has shown that it has the necessary ability to immediately replace its dead commanders with others who are equally capable.

Palestinian Islamic Resistance Movement, Hamas, on the 7th of October (15th of October), in response to more than seven decades of occupation of Palestine and nearly two decades of siege of Gaza and imprisonment and torture of thousands of Palestinians, started the operation known as “Al-Aqsa Storm” .

This operation was one of the deadliest attacks against this regime. Hamas fighters penetrated into the occupied territories at several points of the border fences, attacked the villages and besides killing a large number of Israelis, captured a number of them. Reports indicate that Hamas is currently holding 136 Israeli prisoners in Gaza.

In response to this operation, the Zionist regime launched heavy attacks against Gaza and placed this area under siege. put full The Palestinian Ministry of Health announced in the Gaza Strip today, Friday, February 1, on the 119th day of the Al-Aqsa storm operation, that the number of martyrs in Gaza has reached 27,131 and the number of injured has reached 66,287.

Despite this, as analysts say, Al-Aqsa storm operation has imposed a major security-political defeat on Israel. The Hamas movement has already said that negotiations for the exchange of prisoners will be possible only if the deadly attacks on Gaza end. In November, 81 Israelis and 24 citizens of foreign countries were released in exchange for 240 Palestinians.

The war in Gaza has faced major opposition in the world and has led to the intensification of anti-Zionist sentiments. Today, the New York Times reported that more than 800 officials in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union have signed a letter opposing their respective governments’ support for Israel’s policies in the Gaza war. This is the first time that the officials of European and American countries have agreed to publicly support the policies of their governments against the war in Gaza. They have said that it is their duty to improve the policies of their governments and to work for their interests, and they have written this letter because they believe that it is necessary for governments to change their position on war.

end of message/