Sunak’s anti-immigration project is on the verge of collapse

– International news – Tasnim news agency, the Swiss “SRF” newspaper in an article about the difficulties of “Rishi Sunak”, the British Prime Minister in promoting and implementing Rwanda’s anti-immigration plan and wrote: “Rishi Sunak” had a plan. But now that seems to be failing. With a legal draft, he wanted to declare the African country of Rwanda a safe third country. This allowed him to deport people who had entered his country illegally to Rwanda. This was a maneuver to bypass the Supreme Constitutional Court, with which he could override the decision of the UK Supreme Court not to classify Rwanda as a safe third country. but it is currently facing strong resistance: a parliamentary committee has declared its opposition to this draft law. According to this committee, this law is completely incompatible with the country’s human rights obligations. Criticisms have been raised against this plan by the opposition, by human rights organizations, but also by the Anglican Church and even by his own party.

The author then raised the question why Sunak adheres to the plan to expel Rwanda? British journalist Patrick Walser says that stopping illegal immigration through the English Channel is one of the five big election promises of British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. He added: “Boats carrying immigrants in the Manesh-Khari channel are in the eyes of conservative voters.” He added: In an election year, Sunak cannot disappoint these customers, especially in the south of England.

Furthermore, this project has been worked on for a very long time and a lot of energy is currently invested in that investment. has been placed The British government has already paid between 250 and 300 million francs to Rwanda for the project. Volser said: “Cancellation of this project in an election year will be a big loss of image and prestige for the conservative government. On the other hand, the representatives of the ruling conservative party are also present in the parliamentary committee who are against this legal draft. have. Volser says: Sonak is dividing his party with this project. The Prime Minister is currently fighting on two fronts. For conservative hardliners, the law doesn’t go far enough. They want to eliminate any possibility of recourse in the court, especially in the European Court of Human Rights.

On the other hand, moderate voices are also heard in the conservative party: they say that the decisions of the Supreme Court It is considered shocking that it will be canceled through this law. This is exactly the kind of political interference in the judiciary that African countries are sometimes accused of, Volser said. Conservative Lords in the House of Lords worry that Britain could lose international credibility if the government undermines human rights in this way.

None of this bodes well for Sunak. . Especially this situation is not good considering the 2024 general elections. The polls are currently showing the victory of the opposition – the Labor Party. Patrick Volser, a British journalist, considers one of the main reasons that Sonak failed to fulfill most of his campaign promises.

The cost of living in Britain is still very high, the economy is faltering and the Healthcare takes too long. That is exactly why if at least one plane can go to Rwanda before the election, it is quite symbolic and very important for Sunak. It probably doesn’t matter how many people sit in it. But it will take some time for this plane to actually take off. Recently, an English weekly newspaper quoted the British Home Office as saying that several people from the Rwandan opposition have applied for asylum in England due to persecution in their own country. This issue raises doubts about Sunak’s anti-immigration plan, which calls Rwanda a safe third country. The British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s government wants to send refugees to Rwanda, an East African country. But the argument that Rwanda is a safe third country has become very controversial in this country. Critics believe that there is no legal route for asylum seekers to enter the country. The plans also violate obligations to protect refugees, according to critics. The fact that the government wants to place itself above the decisions of the Constitutional Court by this law also violates the separation of powers. According to critics, Britain has already paid hundreds of millions of pounds to Rwanda without For someone to get there. The Labor Party is talking about a political trick. According to critics, the Rwanda pact was created by then Prime Minister Boris Johnson to divert attention from the “Partygate” scandal. It is trying to attract more votes.

The Conservative Party of England recently suffered a heavy defeat in two mid-term elections in England and lost many of its seats to the opposition Labor Party.

end of message/