There is widespread international support for the establishment of a Palestinian state
| The US representative at the International Court of Justice said there is broad international support for a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine. |
reported by Mehr News Agency quoted Rasha Todi, Richard Wizick, the US representative at the International Court of Justice, said that there is widespread international support for Israel’s two-state solution. And there is Palestine.
Visik claimed that there are difficult options to achieve real security and peace and said: Ending conditions The current motivation can only be realized through the implementation of UN Security Council resolutions, although Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza is linked to ending the crisis and violence.”
V D: Continuing America’s claims and support for the crimes of the Zionist regime, he said: You cannot ask Israel to withdraw without providing security. settle, Israel cannot immediately withdraw from the Palestinian territories, and international laws have not set a time frame for the occupation.
The US representative at the International Court of Justice claimed that “his country does not say that the International Court has no role in expressing its advisory opinion on Israel’s actions in the Palestinian territories” and asked the court to “suggest some not to accept Israel’s actions as the only party to the war”.
He claimed that his country has “repeatedly declared its opposition to any unilateral effort and resort to force to change the existing status of countries’ territories anywhere in the world”.
The International Court of Justice held the third day of public hearings on the legal consequences of Israel’s actions in the Palestinian territories.
Yesterday, Tuesday, the United States once again wrote Algeria’s resolution in the UN Security Council, which called for ceasefire. Bes Fari was vetoed for humanitarian reasons in the Gaza Strip.
13 members of the United Nations Security Council voted in favor of this resolution, the United States was against it and only the United Kingdom abstained.
The drafter of the resolution called for an “immediate ceasefire for humanitarian reasons that should be respected by all parties.”
