The leaked file of the conversation between German officers about the invasion of Crimea is reliable
| German media have claimed that the leaked conversations of the country's top military officials about helping Ukraine to attack the Crimean bridge seem to be authentic. |
According to Webangah News quoted by Mehr News Agency quoted Rashatoudi, according to German media reports, the leaked conversations of the country’s military leaders about helping Ukraine to attack the Crimean Peninsula bridge in Russia are reliable.
Germany’s Welt newspaper reported yesterday, citing several soldiers who have reviewed the leaked audio files, that the file is currently classified as an “authentic” document. has been Spiegel also wrote that after the initial review, “the audio file has been classified as reliable” and further added that the German counter-intelligence agency started its investigation immediately after the leak of this file.
The German Ministry of Defense refused to discuss the contents of these conversations, but admitted that the German military is investigating whether “conversations in the air force were wiretapped.” Or not.”
Margarita Simonyan, the editor of Rashatoudi TV channel, yesterday published the text version of the audio file of the conversation between four German Air Force officers, including General Ingo Gerhalts, and claimed that this file obtained from the authorities of the Russian security service.
German officers in this 38-minute file, dated February 19, about the operational details and objectives of the long-range missiles “Taurus” that Germany is going to send to Ukraine send slowly, they discuss, and this conversation is conducted in a tone where it seems that all issues are agreed upon, and in addition, “how to logically deny the story in such a way as to justify Germany’s failure to cross the red line of direct confrontation” is also discussed. is.
“…and this conversation is conducted in a tone where it seems that all issues are agreed upon,”
Sorry, that’s untrue. The conversation was about the preparation of the Taurus missile system in the light of a possible delivery of that system to Ukraine. Under the condition that this system could be delivered it was speculated what targets the Ukraine (not Germany!) would want to attack. It was estimated that the Crimea bridge would be high on Ukraine’s priority list. The officers were concerned about an unintentional hit of a kindergarten (as an example of a civilian target). How this could be prevented, what difficulties would arise and how this could be communicated to the minister was discussed at length. It was also discussed if and how the necessary precision without involvement of target data analysis in Germany could be achieved (no). Then it was discussed how such an involvement could be concealed, if such a decision would be made because the politicians might want this if they made such a decision.
To repeat: the necessity of the involvement of Germany in the analysis of the target data arised out of the concern that unintended hits of civilian targets be prevented. If the politicians decided there was no concern no German involvement in data analysis would be necessary and then concealment would not be a question. If the politicians decide that the matter is too delicate to make the delivery, which is the current stance of the Chancellor, this would also be a solution of the problem.
It was made clear several times in the discussion that the decision ist still open and up to the Chancellor of Germany. The discussion was there to prepare the minister of the difficulties of such a decision.
That’s a whole different story, isn’t it?
Hello and have a good time
It is very wrong to interfere in the affairs of countries if it is for any other purpose except to create peace.
Does Germany benefit from peace in the region or war? Which one is more beautiful?
Surely peace between Russia and Ukraine will be convenient for everyone
A good deed is good with any expression and a bad deed is bad with any expression.
With thanks for your attention