Liberalism is an evil ideology

Mehr News, International Group Azar Mahdavan: Global developments are advancing rapidly and these developments seem to be a sign of a change in the balance of power and distance from Western and American values. Is. On the other hand, the continuation of the war in Ukraine, the attacks of the Zionist regime on the territory of Gaza and the unresolved challenges of the South Caucasus have made the international atmosphere extremely dark.

U.S. President Joe Biden, who envisioned a stable and predictable relationship with Russia in 2021, as the Russia-Ukraine war continues to enter its second year, such a vision In the last year of his government, he does not see ahead. In fact, Russia destroyed this idea from the very first day of the war and with the start of operations on the territory of Ukraine (2022 AD).

On the other hand, the analysis indicates that the Middle East will pass an era without war and conflict in 2023, but now we are witnessing a devastating regional conflict in the region. Also, although the tension between the US and China has not escalated on the surface, according to analysts, the competition and the change in the military balance create a dangerous combination.

With these interpretations, there is a question, in what form is the new world order emerging? In other words, can this order solve international challenges?

In this regard, the Turkish section (Istanbul) Mehr News Agency , has conducted a detailed interview with “Alexander Dugin”, a prominent Russian philosopher and advisor to Russian President Vladimir Putin. In this conversation, we are trying to examine the developments of the Gaza war, Russia’s conditions for signing the ceasefire agreement with Ukraine, and the solution to the challenges of the South Caucasus. The description of this conversation follows:

Mr. Dogin, after the Russian attack on Ukraine, you wrote in an article: Ukrainians must understand that we We call them to create a new and great Russian power, as well as Belarusians, Kazakhs, Armenians and Azerbaijanis and Georgians and all those who were not only with us and are with us, but will be with us. What does this mean? You are actually pushing Russia into the Great War?

I don’t think so, I am sure that we 3 groups of Russian people, i.e. people of Great Russia, Little Russia (Ukraine) and White Russia (Belarus) all represent one We are a nation and other people from South Caucasus and Central Asia are united through culture, civilization and geopolitical interests. The problem is not agreeing or disagreeing with the independence of these countries. They cannot really be independent. They can create a unique geopolitical space with us, otherwise they will be colonized by the West. Therefore, there is no possibility for their real independence.

What is reflected in the world media about the war in Ukraine is that Russia wants to end Its operations are in Ukraine. Under what conditions does the Moscow government sign the ceasefire agreement with Ukraine?

The purpose of special military operations was to de-Nazify and demilitarize Ukraine. So Putin just confirmed that without achieving these goals, we cannot start peace talks. We are ready to start peace talks, but under the condition that militarism and Nazism stop in Ukraine. But in order to ensure that such goals are realized, we need to take control of all regions of Ukraine, and without that we cannot be sure that there will be a political change in the main part of the Kiev regime, and we cannot be sure that after the negotiations Peace or after peace, Ukraine will focus on efforts to rebuild military power or not.

Furthermore we see that Zelenskiy is signing agreements with Germany and France to precisely re-arm their military. So we can’t start peace talks until Ukraine is completely neutralized or under our control, without that we can’t really start peace talks. We cannot do it quickly because we have to win first sooner or later. No one knows the exact date or time, but it is important if Western aid to Ukraine were to stop today. I think that within 2 weeks, at most, three weeks or a month, Ukraine will be defeated because Ukraine has no potential military power.

Thus, it must be said that Ukraine and Russia are far from a ceasefire and the path long to reach a truce.

Yes; Ukraine is definitely dependent on Western aid, Western money, Western weapons, and Western aid in general, and if the West continues to provide military aid to Ukraine, this (war) can drag on for a long time.

It seems that with the start of the Ukraine war, the ruling order of the world is being replaced by another order. and in fact a new world order is being formed. What is your analysis?

The existing world order is unipolar. This system was created after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and there was a type of Western unipolarity, and the Western world designed its own rules for all humanity. So this unipolar system existed for 30 years or a little more and now it is declining. The progress of Russia, China, Islamic resistance, including in West Asia; All these phenomena show that we are now in the process of changing this unipolar system to a multipolar system. It is important that this is not a return to bipolarity. It is not bipolar but multipolar. Because the Western bloc, Russia and China are currently three independent poles. There are also some powerful regions such as Iran, Turkey, the Arab world, Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Africa and South America. This is a newly emerging multipolarity. This is the emerging multipolar world order, which is not only based on the nation-state as before, but also based on national civilization. This is exactly what is happening. This is the change we are currently living in, the transition from a unipolar system to a multipolar system.

What do you think about the 3+3 platform? Can this platform solve the challenges in the South Caucasus?

I think that the main condition for solving the problem in the South Caucasus is to abandon radicalism and the West, because any involvement of the US and the European Union in this region is any possibility of form It destroys agreement and mutual understanding. I think that the problem in South Kafkaar should be solved by the countries present in this region, i.e. Russia, Iran, Turkey, Georgia, Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan, and without the West. So the main condition to find a way to solve this problem is to find a solution together because there are interests in the South Caucasus. The interests of three major regional powers, namely Russia, Iran and Turkey, intersect, and at the same time, there are connections between each of these regional powers with the smaller countries of the South Caucasus region. For example, Russians, Orthodox Georgians, Azeris, Turks and Muslims belong to similar ethnic groups.

Meanwhile Azeri Muslim Shiites are historically linked with Iran. Armenians are also ethnically or racially close to Iranians. But there are Georgian and Russian Christians who are a different branch of Christianity called Monophysite and they are not Orthodox Christianity like us and Georgians. So there is the intersection of religion, ethnic groups, historical relations and geopolitical interests. We have to solve this problem through the platform of 6 countries, i.e. 3 South Caucasus countries and 3 regional powers, without the interference of anyone else. We must leave the West aside.

The main condition for leaving the West completely out of this matter is to interfere in the platform, and now I think the problem is mainly related to Armenia, because Pashinyan is with Soros and other countries. The West is connected and they are trying to destabilize the region through Armenia. Before that, Georgia was with Saakashvili, who played the role of the agent of the West. The West tried and still tries to destabilize the region and pit all the regional powers against each other. the Russians against the Turks, the Turks against the Iranians, the Iranians against the Russians, etc., but we must leave these western factors aside and first of all form a strategic triangle of Moscow-Tehran-Ankara, and within this strategic triangle we must consider the geopolitical situation place three countries and basically put aside any interference from the West. This is the only solution to the problem in the South Caucasus.

You called Donald Trump’s victory in the 2016 US presidential election “a victory for Russia”. . Do you still believe that Trump’s victory in the 2024 elections will be a victory for Russia and why?

You don’t understand at all what I mean when Donald Trump’s victory is a victory for Russia. We must understand that American policies have two directions. The first direction is the globalists. Hegemonic globalism refers to the tendency of the Democratic Party to apply liberal democracy around the world and be a hegemonic power rather than a regional power, and a similar view shared by the neoconservative group exists within the Republican Party. has it. George Bush Jr. represented this neoconservative group, and Barack Obama or Joe Biden represent the globalism of the Democratic Party. But the neoconservatives and liberal democrats of the Democratic Party generally have a similar view of the unipolar system.

They are the main problem that starts the war and incites the conflicts, and it is precisely these neoconservatives and liberal democrats who supported the color revolutions and started the war in Ukraine. And in the United States, in the Republican Party, there is an alternative vision of American rules and games and the world system. Trump represents these paleoconservatives, or traditional conservatives, not neoconservatives, and the logic tends to be much less interventionist. They propose to focus more on domestic problems, “Make America Great Again” (MAGA), stop illegal immigration, and save some of the traditional wealth of classic American societies.

Trump shows much less intervention in American politics. That is why there is no serious coldness in the relations between America and Russia during the Trump presidency. Trump promised to stop all financial and military aid to Ukraine. So if Ukraine does not receive this huge amount of aid from the US, it means that Russia will quickly win the war. Trump promised to stop it. So if Trump becomes president, I think that the Nazi regime in Kiev will fall and we will win. and we will defeat our enemies.

But at the same time, we have to understand that Trump is very anti-Islam and anti-Iranian, pro-Israel and pro-Zionist, and there may be a conflict between the West and Russia. should exist but be formed between the United States or Israel with the resistance powers, but we must understand that, for example, the Islamic world is not in a direct confrontation at the moment, and Russia alone is at war against the West and Ukraine. There may come a time when the Islamic world will fight with the West and with Trump. So for us, as I believe, the election of Trump indicates a good solution. But it does not mean that he will be perfect for everyone. He is very anti-Chinese and anti-Iranian. The main frontline between unipolar and multipolar can change and can be in a different region of the world, so we can’t say that Trump’s election is a solution for everyone. But there are two elements that we must emphasize.

First of all, theoretically he is not an interventionist and criticizes not only all interventionists and all hegemonic liberals in the Democratic Party but also in the Republican Party. Trump is not a neoconservative, he is an enemy of neoconservatism. So this is a good point. The second good point is that Trump considers far more economic rivals like China than Russia as enemies. But at the same time, he is very pro-Zionism. His rise to power may bring comfort to the world due to his ideology of non-interventionism. But in any case, Russia will feel in a better position than the neoconservatives and globalists in the Democratic Party.

You have called liberalism the essence of Satan. What do you mean by this phrase and why are you openly hostile to liberalism?

Liberalism cuts off any ties to collective identity. So this is absolute individualism. Individualism that tries to free the individual from any type of collective identity. So the person is placed in the center. The development of liberalism began precisely with Protestantism and the destruction of the Catholic collective identity, then the end of the state empire, the traditional state, then civil society versus the nation-state, then the identity of individualism versus gender identity, which is gender politics in the last step. From the development of liberalism, while the ideologies won in the West or on a global scale, the last step is the liberation of the individual human identity because the human identity is also collective, and if we look at this ideology from the religious point of view of Christianity or Islam, we see that this project to take human identity from Humanity has been and is an evil process. This is not just a deviation from liberalism. From the very beginning, liberalism, by placing the individual as the absolute value and the center of the universe, destroyed all possibilities for confronting the truth. This was the destruction of Christianity and the traditional spirit of worldview.

Step by step this has led to absolute nihilism and complete destruction of humanity, and according to religious people, this is Satan’s plan. This is why liberalism is not only a secular ideology, but also an anti-Christian and satanic ideology, in the center of which is the character of Dajjal, the complete enemy of humanity and a spiritual being who has launched an eternal rebellion against God, and this being through the liberal network It makes man destroy all the content of humanity and the projects of post-humanism and post-humanity are the logical result of this historical development of liberalism. Liberalism started with religious liberalism, Protestantism, political-social liberalism and now it is approaching the last stage where humanity will be destroyed and post-human species like “chimeras” and “cyborgs” and artificial intelligence will replace humans. It is “Kerzweil”, “Harari” and liberal globalist thinkers who openly accept and recognize the evil nature of liberalism.

What is your view on the current genocide in the Gaza war? How long can Israel continue this war?

Well, first of all I want to say that from a geopolitical point of view the war in Gaza is another front between unipolar and multipolar. In Ukraine, multipolar Russia is at war with the unipolar West, and its proxy force, i.e. Ukraine, is not a country with authority, it is only a proxy force for the unipolar West complex, and Israel is another proxy force for the unipolar Western world. So these two cases are very similar. Russia is fighting unipolar Ukraine, and the Muslim population and Palestinians of all religions are victims of the same Western world. The killing of Palestinians causes the genocide of the Palestinian population, women and children at the hands of the Israelis. Therefore, I think that in this context, Islam is a multipolar power that fights against American hegemony and imperialism, but what I currently see in Gaza as a whole. And what I see in the Middle East is the mobilization of the Shiite population in the Middle East.

The axis of resistance in the Middle East, except for the Palestinians and Hamas, is mainly from the Shiites, and in other countries, those who are active in the fight against globalism, the Houthis (Ansarullah) in Yemen. Hizbollah in Lebanon, Shia Alevi government in Syria and Shiites in Iraq, so far we have seen that the Shiites are mobilized against the hegemony of the West and unipolarity. Iran may be next, so the Shia countries are the core of resistance and powers in the Middle East, but I think that at the same time, it will be a moment when the Sunni Muslim population will join the fight and war against hegemony. For example, Egypt has promised that if Rafah is bombed, it will fight against Israel. Now Rafah has been bombed in the south of Gaza, and subsequently, Egypt should logically enter the war. Algeria has also promised to join the war.

Well I think that now we are looking at a big war in the Middle East between American hegemony and Islamic civilization and we cannot say what will happen next. But the Zionists are really looking for the destruction and explosion of the Al-Aqsa Mosque, and Milli, the Zionist President of Argentina, recently said publicly that the Zionists want to blow up the Al-Aqsa Mosque and start building the third temple. This is a Zionist project and an apocalyptic project to create a bigger Israel. .

The extermination and genocide in Gaza is a preparation for the creation of a greater Israel, not a two-state solution, the Zionists cynically reject this solution. I don’t think that we can stop what Israel is doing just by protesting, boycotting and opposing their actions. The only way to stop Israel… To destroy the Zionist regime itself, it must be done by the Muslim population and the Islamic world, because If the Islamic civilization does not pay attention to such a genocide and such a regime and closes its eyes to the destruction of the Al-Aqsa Mosque, well, I think that this means that there is no authority whatsoever from the Islamic civilization in the world. So I think the tragic events and genocide in Gaza is the prelude or the first stage of a much bigger war between Islam and the Western complex. I know that Shiite groups play a leading role in this war. But the war can only be successful and fruitful if not only Shiites but all Muslims participate in it. This is my opinion.

In the end, if there is any point or comment, you can share it with our audience.

First of all, I want to thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak to the Iranian audience. All events in the modern world are related to the emergence and eschatology (which deals with the end times). It is certainly clear that the Russian Orthodox circle considers modern Western civilization to be anti-Christ. This is in accordance with Ayatollah Khomeini’s idea regarding the historical mission of the Islamic Revolution in Iran. So I think this theological religion as a precursor to modern politics is a necessary element and also geopolitics is very important. We can understand the real meaning of world events and world change only by putting geopolitics and eschatology together. Time is to combine the geopolitical view of the religious dimension.

This is exactly what modern Iranian ideology does. I think we have to stay together in this resurrection war; Russia and Iran identify Russian Orthodox Christianity and Islam with a similar global perspective on the devil’s geopolitics in the Western collection. We also need to share religious interpretation of the status of the West as the devil or the Antichrist, which reflects social deviation and religious negativity. So it is very important to join these elements, and I think Russia and Iran are on the same front and belong to the clear army that fights the Dark Army in the final struggle.