Continuation of Sunak’s challenges in the implementation of Rwanda’s anti-immigration plan

According to the report of the international group Tasnim news agency, publication ” In an article, “Focus” addressed the issue of continuing disputes about the Rwandan anti-immigration plan, “Rishi Sunak”, the Prime Minister of England in the political field of this country and wrote: The anti-immigration law known as Rwanda is again being negotiated in the British House of Lords. British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak wants to deport the first asylum seekers to Africa soon. But some members of the House of Lords want to prevent this issue.

When talking about this plan, including the 91-year-old Dobbs, he is very angry with the Lords of England. .

In this regard, he said: the British government’s plan to send refugees to Rwanda is “shameful” and damages the reputation and reputation of Britain. Alfred Dobbs knows what it’s like to leave his family and home, because at the age of six he left Prague for London to escape the Holocaust. Today he is in the House of Lords for the opposition Labor Party and defends refugees.

So far the Lords have refused to approve the so-called “Rwanda bill” It has been delayed. Including because this plan violates international laws. But Dobbs reckons the House of Lords will eventually capitulate because the Conservatives were the largest group in the Upper House and the fighting spirit of the mostly older Lords has already weakened.

“Rishi Sonak”, the British Prime Minister, has prioritized the stopping of boats carrying immigrants, especially from the English Channel. According to published figures, almost 30,000 migrants crossed the English Channel last year, mostly in small rubber boats. These asylum seekers and all other refugees who have arrived in the UK “illegally” since the start of 2022 could soon face deportation to Rwanda. Regardless of their origin and without examining their asylum application, they must be transferred to this East African country and then submit their asylum application there instead of England.

Two years Earlier, Boris Johnson was the first Prime Minister in England to charter a plane that was supposed to take a small group of refugees to Kigali in Africa, and this action was done despite the violent protests of many human rights organizations.

The British have so far transferred 140 million pounds to Rwanda, but so far not a single local refugee has set foot on Rwanda’s soil.

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak argues that housing refugees in British hotels costs £6 million a day. He hopes that deportations from Rwanda will have a deterrent effect. Lord Sharpe, the responsible minister, has warned his colleagues in the House of Lords that if the bill is not passed, more people will die on this dangerous crossing. Rishi Sunak also pleaded that the Lords should not stand in the way of “the will of the people” – he believes his tough asylum policy could win some voters over.

However, Rishi Sunak seems determined. is to deport the first people as soon as possible. He has put the issue of immigration at the top of his work.

Not long ago, the British government’s controversial refugee agreement with Rwanda faced another defeat in the House of Lords.

p style=”text-align:justify”>The House of Lords asked the government to investigate whether the refugee treaty is compatible with international law.

Britain wants to declare Rwanda a safe third country under the law, so that there will no longer be an appeal in the British courts for refugees. Members of the House of Lords voted, among other things, for an amendment requiring Rwanda to fully implement the guarantees it had promised before the East African country can be considered safe.

The British government wants to send the first immigrants to Rwanda in the spring. They have to apply for asylum there. There are no plans for them to return to England. Critics consider this project a symbolic move at the expense of taxpayers to win over conservative voters before the upcoming parliamentary elections. Based on the very high costs of the anti-immigration agreement, Rwanda continues to defend this plan and emphasizes the need to implement it in order to deal with the influx of immigrants. The controversial asylum deal to deport illegal immigrants to Rwanda has cost British taxpayers up to half a billion pounds (584 million euros), significantly more than previously announced.

The British Conservative government has so far approved £290 million in spending on the project, but declined to say how much more money London has given to Rwanda. Opponents reacted angrily to these assessments.

Opponents of this project, like the United Nations Refugee Agency, are angry with this British law. Critics believe that there is no legal route for asylum seekers to enter the country. These plans also violate obligations to protect refugees, according to critics.

End message/