Get News Fast

Serious crisis of trust between Paris and Berlin

In an article, a western publication addressed the crisis of trust between the leaders of Germany and France in the Ukraine issue and evaluated it seriously.
– International news

According to the report of the international group Tasnim news agency, newspaper ” In an article, Wirtschaftswohe reported a serious crisis of trust between Germany and France, especially regarding the Ukraine issue, and wrote: The fact remains that Olaf Schultz, the Chancellor of Germany, and Emmanuel Macron, the President of France, are moving away from They are too.

The author went on to discuss the recent meeting of the leaders of France, Germany and Poland in the so-called Weimar Triangle meeting centered on the issue of Ukraine and wrote how the leaders of these countries They squeeze each other to cover their differences.

The author continues to try very hard by Schultz, Macron and Tusk to send unity signals out and get them. He pointed out the gesture for the photo and at the same time reported the lack of deep understanding of the position of the other side, especially in the issue of sending Taurus missiles to Ukraine.

Is: If the discussion revolved only around a single weapon system, this problem could be overcome. Indeed, the debate over this cruise missile is a key catalyst and starting point for a deeper crisis of confidence. These debates concern Europe’s relations with Russia, the appropriate response to Putin’s imperialism, and the question of whether Ukraine can simply endure an imposed war or reconquer parts of its territory.

In another part of this article it is stated: Perhaps even more serious issue is the crisis of trust between Paris and Berlin. As recently as Thursday, Macron convincingly rebuked the German chancellor, once again justifying his controversial statement that he might be forced to support Ukraine with ground troops in three ways: first, based on Previous experience as far as the dynamics of the war is concerned, secondly with regard to the need for “strategic ambiguity” in the face of a belligerent power, thirdly with regard to the scenario of foreseeable consequences in case of Ukraine’s defeat.

He emphasized that two years ago we said that we would never send tanks. Then we did it. Two years ago, we said that we would never send medium-range missiles. We did it. He said: We have set many limits for our vocabulary… We must say with determination, determination and courage that we are ready to act. He emphasized: “If Russia wins the war, the credibility of Europe will be reduced to zero. If we sink… there will be no security in this continent, not for France and certainly not for the countries of the East.

These are the words that some wanted Macron to say 25 months ago – and Schultz still can’t say them 25 months later. The sentences that, with their futuristic sharpness, create the suspicion that Macron regrets France’s active silence towards Ukraine in the past two years and now wants to overcompensate for it.

Ukraine| West counts on Russia only after victory
The impact and difference between the war in Ukraine and the war in Gaza

end of message/

 

© Webangah News Hub has translated this news from the source of Tasnim News Agency
free zones of Iran, heaven for investment | 741 investment packages in Iran's free zones | With a capacity of over 158 billion dollars Safe investment in the Islamic Republic of Iran

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 × three =

Back to top button