Biden Administration’s Social Media Case Review in Court

, the legal case of the Biden administration regarding the moderation of social media content will go to the Supreme Court this evening for the judges of this court to make a decision about this.

According to this report, two Republican prosecutors took this case to the Supreme Court under the title of government censorship campaign. They accused federal authorities of cooperating with social platforms to identify objectionable views, statements, and content.

At the center of this case The Biden administration’s efforts to control online misinformation about the legitimacy of the 2020 election and issues related to the Covid-19 pandemic come at a time when there were doubts about vaccines.

This sentence was issued following the petition of the Republican prosecutors of Missouri and Louisiana. The two prosecutors accused Biden administration officials of going too far in their efforts to encourage social media to monitor and investigate posts aimed at disrupting elections or questioning vaccination during the coronavirus pandemic.

According to the ruling, entities such as the Department of Health and Human Services and the FBI cannot pressure, compel or encourage social media to remove, remove, censor or Modification of contents including freedom of speech, meet under the freedom of speech clause of the first amendment of the US Constitution.

Furthermore, in this ruling, people such as Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Jen Easterly in charge of the Cyber ​​Security and Infrastructure Security Agency, for whom this restriction is considered, are mentioned. Exceptions are also made for communications between officials and state-owned companies, including warnings about threats to national security and criminal activities. .

Following the announcement of this sentence, these two prosecutors welcomed it in a tweet and considered it a victory for freedom of expression. Some Republicans accused the Biden administration of exploiting the Corona crisis and threatening false information to limit views and posts against the government. But American officials consider the purpose of this action to limit false information about corona vaccination in order to reduce predictable deaths. color:black”>.

But court observers have criticized the decision of the Louisiana District Court and it described with a large scope, and in September of last year, a panel of 3 judges in the Court of Appeal limited the sentence issued.

With this Now, an appeals court has confirmed that the Biden administration has violated the First Amendment by formally pressuring social media to take down or remove certain content, and thus ruled that federal agencies cannot use social media platforms. to force the removal of posts that are against the government’s positions. Marz has rejected coercion of social platforms, while the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and the State Department have not. But after further investigations, it became clear that CISA also exceeded its limits.

After sending the case to the Supreme Court, Missouri Attorney General who was one of the prosecutors who brought the case to the agency, said his team is evaluating the wide-ranging violations and censorship of the Biden administration in a higher court.

According to this report, the submission of this case to the Supreme Court is influenced by social media critics, which can reflect the consequences and aspects of freedom of speech. .

Previously, judges have heard cases about whether government officials can access critical elements of people’s personal social media accounts. blocked and whether the US Constitution allows state officials to prevent social media platforms from removing posts about their views.

Supreme Court justices are investigating whether a New York government official violated the National Rifle Association’s speech by discouraging banks and insurers from working with them, according to the report. A case that is being investigated at the same time as the social media case of the Biden administration. It is enforceable and this court has the necessary jurisdiction in this field. And this means that government officials can continue to contact social media until the Supreme Court issues a final ruling.

End Message /