6 questions about the Security Council resolution for a ceasefire in Gaza

According to the international group Tasnim news agency, on Monday after more than 170 days of war in Gaza, 14 of the 15 members of the UN Security Council voted in favor of and supported the resolution presented by the non-permanent members of this council to establish an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, and the United States of America, as a permanent member of this council, abstained. In this way, the resolution to establish a ceasefire in Gaza was approved. With this resolution, the Security Council has called for an immediate ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza and the immediate and unconditional release of all prisoners. This resolution asks the parties to comply with their obligations under international law regarding all detained persons.

This is the fourth binding resolution that went to the UN Security Council for the realization of a ceasefire in Gaza and for the first time. The bar was approved in the 171 days of the war against Gaza, and America had to abstain instead of veto after the embarrassment that the Zionists have had for the White House during this time. During all this time, the Biden government vetoed the resolutions. Despite this significant change in the position of the Security Council regarding the Gaza war, the Zionists, regardless of the aforementioned resolution, continue to carry out their brutal aggression against civilians in Gaza. They continue and a few hours after the issuance of this resolution, they committed several new massacres and crimes. Accordingly, this important question arises in everyone’s mind, to what extent the resolution of the Security Council regarding the immediate ceasefire in Gaza. Is it binding and is it actually useful or not?

This resolution, presented under the sixth chapter of the UN Charter by 10 elected members of the Council, calls for an immediate ceasefire in the holy month of Ramadan and respect for it by all parties. ; in a way that leads to a permanent and sustainable ceasefire.

This resolution also calls for the immediate and unconditional release of all prisoners, as well as guaranteeing the arrival of humanitarian aid, including medical supplies, etc., to Gaza, and emphasized states that the parties must fulfill all their obligations based on international law against all prisoners.

But in the meantime, there are 6 important years about the said resolution, which is as follows:

1-Is the Security Council resolution for a ceasefire in Gaza binding?

The Security Council resolution is considered legally binding for the conflicting parties, especially that in the text of Resolution No. 2728, it explicitly states the establishment of a ceasefire and The release of prisoners has been emphasized. In fact, the tone of this resolution is not recommendatory, and this resolution clearly asks the parties to cease fire and is actually binding.

2- Does the binding nature of the Security Council resolution apply to Israel and Hamas?

This legally binding resolution applies to the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) and Israel, as well as the countries supporting the parties to the conflict.

3- Which institutions are responsible for ensuring the implementation of this resolution?

The Security Council resolution immediately after issuing It is effective and effective, and no force is needed to implement it.

Sultan Barkat, professor of public policies at Hamad Bin Khalifa University in Doha, emphasized in an interview with Al Jazeera that the resolutions of the Security Council after their approval are valid and if any of the parties to the conflict do not comply with these resolutions, the Security Council will reconvene to use military force to force the two parties to implement the resolutions.

4-Is According to the Security Council resolution, is the ceasefire conditional on the release of Israeli prisoners?

According to the text of this resolution, the ceasefire in Gaza is not conditional on the release of Israeli prisoners from the Gaza Strip, especially since the Israelis have not specifically requested the release of their prisoners and therefore It can be concluded that this resolution calls for the release of Israeli and Palestinian prisoners alike.

5- What are the consequences of not adhering to the resolution?

According to Sultan Barakat, if Israel If it does not comply with this resolution and continues its aggression, the United Nations can impose economic and international sanctions against this regime. In this case, Israel must also be held accountable and prosecuted for violating the UN Charter.

6- Is this resolution considered the first resolution of the Security Council against Israel?

From this resolution, several other resolutions of this type were issued against the Zionist regime, one of the most prominent of which is Resolution No. 1701, according to which the July 2006 war between the army of this regime and the Lebanese Hezbollah ended. The Security Council also issued a resolution against Israel in 2016, according to which settlement construction in the West Bank is illegal and Israel should not expand it. However, the Zionists’ aggression occurred two days after the Council’s resolution was issued. The security, which demands an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, continues in the most brutal way possible. Therefore, we have to wait and see if this time the United Nations and the international community can at least to some extent distance themselves from the double standards and take serious action to curb the brutality of the Israeli occupation against the Palestinian people regardless of American pressure.

end of message/