Re-intensification of disputes over the reform of the common European asylum system

According to the report of the international group Tasnim news agency, publication ” “Focus” wrote in an article: About two months before the European elections, the European Union Parliament will soon lay the foundation stone of reforms that have involved this 27-member organization for years, which is the renewal of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS). /p>

The final vote in the EU Parliament, scheduled for April 10, is expected to give a majority among the Christian Democrats, Social Democrats and Liberals. But in the meantime, the greens want to vote against the European Union asylum system reform plan. The existence of official European languages ​​is currently being investigated by language lawyers. But the text itself will not change.

However, there is still a need for internal discussions within the Greens faction in the EU Parliament. Eric Marquardt, the representative of the Greens, told Tagus Spiegel that the faction will continue to discuss the voting behavior on the eight laws of the plan in detail. But he made it clear that nothing will change in the basic tendency to reject the CEAS reforms. where asylum seekers are detained before entering the EU.

Rasmus Andersen, a colleague of the Marquardt parliamentary group, also reiterated that there are major doubts among the Greens. Whether the asylum policy can really be organized with a number of innovations of the CEAS reforms. “Our fear is that many of the proposals may come at the cost of a regular asylum policy,” he explained.

Andersen was particularly critical of the fact that countries that Located on the EU’s external borders, such as Italy and Greece, they are left alone even after reforming the EU’s asylum system. In addition, asylum seekers continue to be exposed to trafficking gangs. Andersen said: “A responsible and humane policy for asylum looks different.” , the European Union Parliament, Member States and the Commission agreed to intensify their approach to illegal immigrants.

In this plan, among other things, faster procedures at the external borders of the Union. Europe is set to ensure the deportation of migrants without prospects. According to experts, however, these reforms are unlikely to have any effect until the European elections in early June.

If there is a sharp increase in immigration, The crisis makes it possible for people to be held for longer periods of time in asylum centers at external borders under prison-like conditions. It is not understandable that the Greens will vote against the key points of the reforms in the upcoming vote to reform the European asylum process. Daniel Caspari, the head of the party faction. The Christian ally in the European Union Parliament also said: “The Greens have not yet understood that if all those who want to come to us are allowed to come here, many parts of the society will be drowned.

The Christian Democratic Party politician explained that in this way, disillusioned voters are driven towards extremists and populists. If we want to limit and control immigration, we need CEAS reform. This is what we Christian Democrats want.

The German newspaper “Tugschau” also wrote in an article: European countries such as Italy and Malta often take action against private sea rescuers. Aid organizations talk about violations of the law and ask for help from the European Union. But there is no agreement on this in Brussels.

Last year, Italy issued strict laws against private sea rescuers. Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani justified this tougher approach at a ministerial meeting in Brussels by saying that these are problems that need to be solved. Since then, civilian aid ships have been seized by Italian authorities on more than 20 occasions, says Oliver Kulikowski, a spokesman for the aid organization Sea Watch.

Time, Italy sends these ships carrying refugees to very distant ports. Last year, the rescue ships had to travel 150,000 km unnecessarily. has been recorded in some countries where NGO maritime rescuers are threatened or at least hindered in their work. O’Reilly says: “Although the European Union talks about the priority of saving human lives, they see rescue at sea more than anything “as a pull factor for migrants”.

In this situation, the number of migrant victims on the way to Europe is increasing sharply. AD have sunk or disappeared, most of them were in the central Mediterranean route. Therefore, many members of the European Parliament criticize the policy of the Italian government, which is constantly trying to prevent the movement of sea rescue ships with new measures. In this regard, Italy is also supported by other Mediterranean countries of the European Union such as Malta, Cyprus and Greece.

end of message/