Comparing the military approach of Iran and Israel from the perspective of international ethics

Mehr News, International Group: Finally, on the evening of Sunday, April 14th, the missile units and drones of the IRGC Aerospace Unit The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps fired more than 300 ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and attack drones at military targets in the occupied territories. Although the defense system of the Zionist regime countered part of Iran’s attack, some sources report that Navatim and Ramon bases in the Negev desert were targeted.

The balance of power in the Middle East region changed once again in favor of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the axis of resistance. Article 51 of the UN Charter targeted the depth of the occupied territories. The point that perhaps more than any manifestation of the “Vada al-Sadegh” operation has attracted the attention of some analysts and general audiences is that the Iranian armed forces did not target any civilian or even diplomatic center in response to the Zionists and followed the basic principles of war. They adhered to the classics. Based on this, in the continuation of this note, we will try to examine Iran’s responsible response to the illegal and terrorist attack in Damascus.

During the last twenty-four hours, the headlines of all reliable regional-international media and think tanks have been dealing with Iran’s legitimate response to Israel’s terrorist attack in Damascus and its possible consequences for the security of the Middle East. . A group of analysts considered this attack as a necessary and stabilizing measure that can stop the extravagance and aggression of the Zionists against the countries of the region.

Another group, rejecting this theory, believes that Iran’s counter-response can be abused by the Zionists and cause the beginning of a new chapter of direct conflict between Tehran and Tel Aviv. Regardless of the above two approaches, what seems certain is that the Islamic Republic of Iran fulfilled its promise of “revenge” and, at the same time, respected the moral principles in preserving the lives of civilians and civilian places, contrary to the traditional policy of the Israeli army.

Despite some doubts regarding the interpretation of Israel’s attack on the Iranian consular building in Damascus, but finally, the senior leaders of the regime along with international law experts, the Zionist terrorist attack in Syria They considered it as an attack on Iran’s territory and responded to the action of the Israeli army based on the principle of “legitimate defense” in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, not “attack”.

During this attack, although the IRGC had the ability to completely destroy the infrastructure and military barracks of Israel, it preferred to do so based on necessity and simply to restore the balance between the two sides. target the occupied territories. In other words, the attack on Sunday evening was not an attempt to deliver the “final blow” to Israel, but an attack aimed at creating deterrence and redrawing the fire lines with Tel Aviv. Understanding the above point will help the audience to correctly analyze Iran’s attack on Israel and the need to avoid expanding the scope of the war.

But perhaps the most important point in the course of the “Vadah al-Sadiq” operation was the requirement of the Islamic Republic of Iran to maintain the safety of civilians. Contrary to the crimes of the Israeli army in the Gaza Strip, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has not targeted any residential areas, places of worship, hospitals, bakeries, schools, water tanks or even kindergartens under the pretext of targeting the enemy’s base.

Given the significant vulnerability of Israel’s defense systems against mass and combined resistance attacks, if Tehran had the will to take casualties from the Zionists, it would have to plan to realize This goal was very easy based on past experiences. However, Tehran decided to once again remind the Zionists of the ethics of war by observing the professional principles of war and attacking military targets and show Israel’s irresponsible leaders a proper model for dealing with the defenseless people of Gaza.

The killing of more than 33,000 civilian women and children and the destruction of most of the vital infrastructure in the Gaza Strip is perhaps the most important document to prove the apartheid and immoral system of the Zionist regime. In the cycle of genocide, the residents of Gaza, not only the native people, but also the forces affiliated with various departments of the United Nations or other non-governmental and international groups, became moving targets for the Israeli terror machine.

Infectious diseases, epidemic of hunger and failure to meet the basic needs of Palestinian men and women have turned Gaza into the biggest place of conscience and human morality. The amount of crimes committed by the Israeli enemy is so obvious and severe that the European and American governments cannot lie to their teenagers about the current events in Gaza and once again raise the flag of human rights hypocritically.

Bahre Sakhan

The unprecedented escalation of tensions between Tehran and Tel Aviv served as a wake-up call for world powers and Western supporters of Israel that if the war in Gaza does not end sooner or later, the international community He should prepare himself for the Middle East to be set on fire.

In other words, in order to stay in power and achieve the unrealistic goals of the regime in Gaza, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu showed that he would not accept any immoral actions such as killing women and children. or targeting the Iranian consular building in a third country will not refrain. In such a campaign, the “humane” and “chivalrous” behavior of the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran in response to the recent aggression of the Zionist regime and the lack of planning to cause human casualties to the regime shows the moral principles of the Iranian armed forces against the Zionist aggressors.