Israel’s second defeat; Failure in diplomacy after defeat in the field

International Group Tasnim News Agency- The emergency session of the Security Council called “The Middle East Situation” to review Iran’s punitive action on Sunday against the Israeli regime, which was organized at the request of this regime, ended without issuing any statement or resolution. This meeting was organized at the request of the Zionist regime, and the purpose of Tel Aviv’s request was , according to the regime’s usual mentality, it was to oppress and gain international support as well as to put pressure on the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Despite this, the meeting finally progressed in such a way that after Israel’s defeat in the field in the attacks On Sunday morning, it suffered another failure in the field of diplomacy.

Israel’s attempt was to separate Iran’s punitive response from the main cause of its origin, which was the attack on the Iranian consular building in Damascus on April 13, but most of the countries present , even those who did not show much cooperation with Iran’s operation, were forced to include their arguments – at least not to look ridiculous – in the framework of Israel’s tension-making. Iran’s military was condemned for the Damascus attack without the slightest reference. This behavior once again shines light on their schizophrenic mentality and the extent of their disconnection from objective realities, and their hypocrisy regarding adherence to the so-called “law-based order”.

For example, “Vasily Nebenzia”, ​​the ambassador and representative of Russia in the United Nations, revealed the lack of condemnation of the contradiction in the statements of “Antonio Guterres”, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, and said: “The Secretary-General of the United Nations immediately condemned Iran’s attack, but in The case of Israel’s attack on the Iranian consulate did not have such a reaction. This approach is not correct.”

The Russian ambassador to the United Nations added: “We warned at the Security Council meeting that Israel’s action should be condemned explicitly, but it was ignored. We proposed a draft for a declaration, but the United States, England and France refused to accept the principles of international law and did not accept it.” He clarified: “Western countries, including France, England and the United States support They refused to make a statement condemning Israel’s attack on the Iranian consulate on April 1, and now they are condemning Iran, and this shows their hypocrisy.” The Russian ambassador said: “The result is now clear to everyone. You know very well that an attack on a diplomatic center is a bellicose act according to international law, and if a Western mission was attacked, you would immediately react with revenge.”

The Russian representative continued: ” This approach is because for you, everything related to Western representation and Western citizens is sacred and should be protected. But when it comes to the right of other countries, including the right to defend themselves against their nationals, it is a different matter. If the consulate or embassy of a western country was targeted, these countries would immediately condemn it and demand the punishment of the aggressor, but when other countries intervene and they want to use their right to defend themselves, the westerners display their double standard.

The representative of China also raised similar facts. The deputy representative of China to the United Nations said: Iran’s representation in Syria was targeted and caused many casualties to Iran, and this action was a violation of the United Nations Charter and also a violation of Syria’s sovereignty.

The Chinese diplomat further added: “We express deep concern about Iran’s action, but Iran has emphasized that this action was retaliatory and has ended. We demand restraint from the parties and avoid further tension in the region.”

This diplomatic victory was added to the achievements that Iran gained from the “Honest Promise” operation. This operation was able to show the weakness of Israel’s defense sector and determined how dependent Israel is on international and regional protection layers.

Iran managed to hit Israel in a way that this regime did not imagine. Or he did not expect it. Another important point is that while Israel played all its defensive cards to counter Iran’s attack, Iran did not use all its offensive cards. The way it works has helped Iran a lot, and this country and its allies can use this information in bigger and more serious confrontations. Iran’s operations against Israel reveal the perspectives of forces active in the region, especially America and Iran. Kurdish and the certain thing that became clear after this operation was that these two sides are not in the course of a large-scale confrontation with each other and also the state of relative balance between them is established. Iran can be considered the winner of both field and diplomacy fields. Iran’s Answer to Israel is