What do Israeli experts say about Iran’s historic operations?

According to the international group Tasnim news agency, despite all the efforts of the authorities and military apparatus and the security of this regime to conceal the damage caused, Zionist experts and analysts consider this operation to be the latest failure of Israel following the irreparable failure of the Al-Aqsa storm operation on October 7, 2013.

The Zionist regime’s hands are closed in dealing With Iran’s drone and missile operations, it is not limited to possible financial and human strikes on this regime, because after nearly half a century has passed since the 1973 half-and-half attack of Arab countries on Israel in order to liberate the occupied territories, this regime Bar was the target of an attack by an important regional power; So that the myth of the deterrence of the Zionist regime as an actor with nuclear weapons technology will fall apart at the hands of Iran, and a severe blow to the prestige of this regime will be inflicted on the international level. This issue is clearly shown by analyzing the statements and positions of the Zionist observers and analysts.

In this regard, “Ben Sabati”, a researcher of the Israel Security Studies Center, published his analysis in the first hours after the operation of the Sadeq. Shed, wrote: This conflict has ended with Iran’s tangible victory, and we should not think that the situation is equal because of the attack on the consulate. Iran’s victory and success is greater.

Emphasizing the unprecedented entry of Iranian missiles and drones deep into the soil and airspace of the occupied territories, Sabati considered their flight over the governing institutions of this regime as a sign of Iran’s victory.

Retired Israeli General Isaac Brik criticized the lack of foresight of Zionist officials and analysts and stated: We have the capacity to be destroyed and we are vulnerable. We don’t have a complete defensive capability at all, not behind the front, not against missiles, not otherwise. Multi-layered defense costs billions of dollars.

In the continuation of this TV interview, Brik said, referring to the miscalculations of the Zionist military and security apparatuses: We have a handful of missiles that are supposed to help us repel Iranian missile attacks. . How long are these missiles enough for? two days? If the war lasts for several weeks and thousands of rockets are fired at us every day, what can we do?

This retired Zionist general then said about the Israeli attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus: After our attack on the consulate Iran, everything has changed in Damascus. The Iranians are threatening in a way that they did not do before. An attack on Iran will be terrible if the tension escalates. If this does not happen now, it does not mean that it will never happen. We must be ready for this attack, because if something happens, we will no longer exist.

Brick clarified at the end: war with Iran is not a war with a country. It is a regional war, for which we are not prepared at all. We talk a lot, but we don’t prepare ourselves for this danger.

However, “Osher Cohen”, a professor at Bar Ilan University, while appearing on the analytical program of Channel 14 of the Zionist regime, criticized the approach of the military and security authorities. Israel said: Israel’s reactions are adjusted based on the results of strikes and threats, not based on their intentions, and this is very bad.

“Sakhi Yehzakoli”, an analyst and commentator with a history of Zionist TV channels, also criticized the policy of Joe Against Iran’s attacks and Washington’s pressure to prevent Israel’s response, US President Biden wrote on X social network: America is not a good supporter. Biden’s wish is that we do not respond directly to Iran and do not start a world war.

These statements clearly indicate the fact that Iran’s deterrent action during the True Promise operation is not only the calculation circle of the Zionist regime, but even the structure The cost and benefit assessment of America as the most important international supporter of this regime has overshadowed it.

The damage caused by the nightmare of April 14, 2024 for the Zionists is only the damage caused to the deterrence power of this regime. not limited; As some Zionist analysts claimed, the damages inflicted on Israel’s security forces during Iran’s retaliatory operations went beyond the scope of operations and even caused a systemic crisis in the political decision-making structure of the Zionists, especially the leaders of this regime.

Since the end of Iran’s Sadiq Operation, media speculations about how the Zionist authorities might react to this operation have become one of the most important topics for columnists and analysts inside and outside the occupied territories. . However, a review of the various propositions presented in the Zionist media during the last 48 hours shows that the senior Zionist officials even reached a consensus in order to decide how to interact with Iran, which does not have nuclear weapons, which are all the red lines of a regime. equipped with nuclear weapons, they are powerless.

On this basis, “Ronen Bergman”, a prominent Zionist security expert and journalist, in a tweet that he published on his X page, while highlighting the crisis The decision was made by the senior officials of the Zionist regime, quoting an informed source in the War Cabinet Council of this regime, who wrote: If it were possible to broadcast the meetings of the Israeli War Cabinet live on YouTube, at least 4 million people (half of the residents of the occupied territories) would flee. They were on their way to Tel Aviv’s Ben-Gurion Airport.

This fact has been confirmed by some officials in Netanyahu’s cabinet. For example, Miki Zohar, the Minister of Culture of the Zionist regime, criticizing the performance of the war cabinet of this regime, says: the weak response to the unprecedented attacks of Iran is a continuation of the same logic that led us to the 7th of October 2023 and the attack of Hamas.

In the same context, Zohar adds: “War management is not done well and this process is hitting Israel.” Our deterrence has been seriously hit and we have lost our hands.

In addition to Israeli analysts and senior officials, think tanks and decision-making centers of the Zionist regime have also analyzed and assessed the consequences of the strike. Operation True Promise acknowledges the regional and international hegemony of Israel and its allies. For example, Israel’s Internal Security Studies Institute admits that Iran was able to strike Israel without forcing Washington to react. This institute adds: From a strategic point of view, Israel and America could not prevent Iran’s response.

What do the Israeli newspapers say?

The Zionist media, despite the protocols and instructions compiled by the Zionist regime’s censorship department, could not hide the facts arising from the new security equations in West Asia after the operation of the honest promise. For example, “Yediot Aharonot” newspaper, in a report, considered the attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus to be a wrong action due to the incorrect assessments of the Zionist regime’s cabinet, and called Iran’s retaliatory attack on the occupied territories a strategic failure for the Israeli regime, and added: “The Iranians before firing the rockets.” and the drone won.

This Zionist media, referring to the strategic failure of the Israeli regime after Iran’s retaliatory operation, emphasized that Israel carried out the terror operation (attack on the Iranian embassy in Damascus) for two weeks. , was paralyzed by the fear of Iran’s response.

The columnist of Yediot Aharonot newspaper continues to ask his audience why such a terrorist operation had to be carried out by Israel; An operation that could lead to a new confrontation for the Israeli army, which is a million times more complicated than the current conflict and battle on the north-south front? Even while the war is still going on in these fronts?

Ha’aretz newspaper also analyzed the various dimensions of Israel’s failure in Operation True Promise in an article written by Haim Levinson and writes: “We must accept the reality that we failed.” We have eaten, and the recent Iranian attack added a psychological failure to our series of failures.

Levinson adds: The collective psychology of individual Israelis today has sunk into a situation that we have never experienced.

>

By rereading the positions and opinions published in the space of the occupied territories, we find out that the roar of missiles and drones of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the morning hours of April 26, 1403 ended decades of the legend of the inviolability and deterrence of the Zionist regime in the region. It is not hidden from any fair observer that Tehran was able to target the occupied territories with a much wider operational capacity than the firepower of resistance groups such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad or Hezbollah, and as a result, the range of financial losses. and bring a far greater human than the Al-Aqsa storm operation or even the 33-day war on the Zionists.

As a result, it seems that even the comprehensive but controlled operation of the promise of truth from Iran is trying to send a meaningful and immediate message on the one hand. convey to the leaders of the regime and on the other hand to their regional and international supporters; The operation was a tremendous change in Iran’s security strategy at the regional level, in which it warns all the enemies of the resistance axis to stop any attempt to move the red lines of the resistance axis in the region and to withdraw from any illegitimate ambitions in the near future. .

end of message/