Exposing Netanyahu’s deceptions to fail negotiations

According to the international group Tasnim news agency, among the numerous sidelines and contradictory news about Cairo talks on a cease-fire in Gaza, and Hebrew media reported that the talks may fail. A Palestinian source reported last night that there were positive and cautious developments in the talks regarding the exchange of prisoners and an end to aggression against the Gaza Strip. It is.

This source stated in a conversation with Al-Mayadeen that there are continuous efforts to find a formula to approach the ceasefire.

Netanyahu’s deception to prevent the agreement

On the other hand, the Hebrew media, citing Zionist circles, reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continues to issue statements against the agreement with Hamas.

Jerusalem Post newspaper announced in this regard Kurdish circles and Israeli experts believe that Netanyahu is obstructing the agreement and these circles have decided to reveal Netanyahu’s game in the field of obstructing the prisoner exchange deal. The anonymous official does not express the view of the cabinet. In fact, the official whose name was not revealed and who was referred to as an anonymous source and who even threatened to enter Rafah in case of any agreement is Netanyahu himself. Jeroz Elm Post revealed that Netanyahu’s goal is to deceive the public. It is common to pretend that there is consensus among Israelis on the issue of military escalation and the failure of the agreement. The Hebrew media also reported that there is pressure from inside and outside on Netanyahu to conclude an agreement with Hamas in It is increasing and this is while Netanyahu is still insisting on rejecting this agreement and insisting on continuing the war and attacking Rafah. This is in the context that the Hamas movement has made its agreement with the agreement conditional on the implementation of the demands of this movement and on top of them a permanent cessation of war.

These media and also the representatives of the Knesset have tried to defeat the agreement of the exchange of prisoners. they accuse Also, Hebrew sources quoted a political source as saying that Tel Aviv will not agree to the end of the war within the framework of any agreement with Hamas, and whether a ceasefire is established for the release of Israeli prisoners from Gaza or not, the Israeli army will enter Rafah. /p>

Channel 12 of the Zionist regime TV also announced that Netanyahu’s office emphasized in its press meetings that Israel will not stop attacking Rafah and will not agree to the end of the war.

Last night, the Hebrew newspaper Yisrael Hayom reported, quoting international news agencies, that “Khalil al-Hiya”, the deputy head of Hamas in the Gaza Strip, who had traveled to Cairo, left Egypt for some consultations after two days of negotiations.

According to this Hebrew media, a source familiar with the negotiation process told Reuters, the negotiations were on the verge of collapse, but “William Burns”, director of the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), to talk with “Mohammed Al-Thani” The Prime Minister of Qatar visited Doha. This Zionist media announced that the Hamas delegation informed the Egyptian and Qatari mediators of their response and conducted deep and serious negotiations in this regard. Also, the Hamas movement announced that it interacts with this issue in a positive and responsible manner and has tried to reach a mechanism that can lead to an agreement, in order to respond to the demands of the Palestinian people in a complete end to the enemy’s aggression against Gaza, the complete withdrawal of the occupiers from the Gaza Strip, the return of the refugees to the north of the Gaza Strip, the increase of humanitarian aid to Gaza, the reconstruction of this area and the exchange of prisoners. He also announced that this movement wants to reach a comprehensive agreement that will end the aggression and ensure the withdrawal of the Israeli army from the Gaza Strip and achieve a serious agreement for the exchange of prisoners, and if the first result of any agreement is not a ceasefire, then there is no conceptual agreement.