Redefining the future interactions between Iran and the Agency in Isfahan
The statements of Iran's nuclear officials and the Agency after the talks in Isfahan re-emphasize diplomacy and have two key points; First, the March statement is the basis of cooperation and is not a new document, and second, it is an attempt to redefine the future interactions between the two sides. |
According to the international group Tasnim news agency, Isfahan is hosting the first The International Nuclear Science and Technology Conference is attended by domestic and foreign experts, and the presence of Rafael Grossi, the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, has doubled the importance of this meeting and everyone was waiting for a new achievement in the interactions between Iran and the Agency. It was already predicted that this trip and discussion regarding controversial matters could be a good opportunity to improve the relations between Iran and the Agency. met and used the opportunity of this meeting to discuss some issues between them.
After the end of this meeting, both sides came to the journalists and made statements that indicate The re-emphasis of the two sides on the cooperation and revival of the diplomatic process in the technical aspects of the nuclear case was related to the nuclear case. Rafael Grossi said in the group of reporters: We are now in a sensitive process. Last night and today we had intensive consultations to take mutual steps. More than a year ago, we agreed to issue a statement to define the future path, that document (March 2022 statement) was important. This document also refers to what is needed to resolve the remaining issues and specifies the additional steps that the parties should take. He added: Despite the shortcomings, steps have been taken and the contents of the document are valid. It is necessary for us to take operational steps and I made a proposal to Iran. The teams of the parties are defining additional steps in a separate meeting.
Grossi’s words mean that the International Atomic Energy Agency, which is under the political pressure of the United States and the Zionist regime, in the agency itself and in the cooperation process of this institution. With Iran, once again, it considers the March document, which was obtained after many negotiations, to have enough validity to solve the issues and again demands to return to that agreement. In this way, the Agency is looking for the continuation of monitoring of Iran’s peaceful nuclear program and solving the knots and remaining questions in this regard.
Another point in Grossi’s words was that a new document in It is not work and only the return to the previous process of cooperation has been agreed. However, in further explaining his meaning in this context, he stated: Our intention is not to produce a new document and our basis is the March statement. These are the operational steps we have taken to take. The joint statement has the capacity to resolve the remaining issues. We agreed on concrete and operational steps to implement the joint statement.
Grossi’s approach was a confirmation of the previous view of experts on Iran issues, that this trip was based on developments and conditions in the region, as well as on the relations between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency and the alleged cases of the Agency against the program. Iran’s peaceful nuclear program is of particular importance and can lead to the correction of the non-constructive process of the Agency towards Iran in the case of a technical approach and lack of attention to political issues and increase cooperation between them.
The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency in Over the past years, regardless of Iran’s extensive cooperation with the IAEA and the granting of access to this body for inspection, it had raised its political claims against Iran’s peaceful nuclear program in quarterly reports to the Council of Governors and also in interviews with the media.
In Grossi’s last quarterly report to the Council of Governors in March of last year, the director general’s political approach was also evident, criticizing Iran’s approach in reducing cooperation with this agency and regarding issues such as safeguards and the term of the remaining two places. The suspension of the implementation of the amended code 3.1 as well as the inspections had repeated the previous claims. However, the turning point of the Isfahan meetings can be considered the emphasis of the officials of both sides on redefining the future interactions between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency. >
Mohammed Eslami, head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, in the same direction and in the same press conference, pointing out that the March statement is the basis and cornerstone of future interactions, emphasized: due to some issues, movements and trends The interactions between the two sides have slowed down, but today, after reviewing the joint statement (March statement), we hope to continue this baseline.
The format of the JCPOA was closed under the title of PMD and it is imbued with political and peripheral issues and is always followed up with its own requirements and should not spread to other sectors. In this section, the important topic of discussion is two places left, and fortunately, two places have been closed, and the issue of material inconsistency has also been closed, and two of the four places are left. within the framework of safeguards and NPT and the considerations of the International Atomic Energy Agency, we should take reciprocal and coordinated actions for the shortcomings and expectations that exist.
The vice president of our country said: The future and mutual expectations and the role of the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, which can be effective in removing the obstacles that are mainly political. have a discussion on the timelines and items of these three sections; This is the beginning of a process. However, knowing that Iran’s enemies, especially the United States and the Zionist regime, will continue their sabotage process, Islami said: Another important issue is to be careful of hostile actions that It is founded against the nuclear program and its origin is the Zionists, so it does not affect the interactions between the two sides.
In general, it can be said that regardless of the technical and scientific aspects of the conference, the conclusion of the negotiations with The goal of the agency to move away from political approaches towards the nuclear program and return to the process of cooperation is considered a diplomatic achievement for the Islamic Republic of Iran.
© | Webangah News Hub has translated this news from the source of Tasnim News Agency |