Kharazi: We have shown that it is possible to give a definitive answer to the Israeli regime

According to the report of the international group Tasnim news agency, Kamal In an interview with Al Jazeera Mubasher network, Kharazi, the head of the Strategic Foreign Relations Council, answered several questions, including about the developments in Gaza, the geopolitical changes in the region due to this war and the “Honest Promise” operation, as well as the change in the global order towards a multipolar world. .

By rejecting the possibility of realizing the two-state plan, he emphasized the deception of the Zionist regime in pursuing any plan to establish peace and security in the region, referring to historical records such as the Oslo Agreement. And he clarified: If America wants to put pressure on the Israeli regime, it must first stop sending weapons to this regime. It is very meaningless that on the one hand, it provides weapons and financial facilities to the Israeli regime, and on the other hand, in the propaganda scene, it wants to resolve this Gaza war.

Kharazi Iran determined to support the resistance axis in the region and emphasizing that each member of this axis makes decisions based on field conditions and acts independently, he said: The resistance forces in any country they are in are not against that country. are the resistance forces against the Israeli regime.

What follows is the full text of this conversation:

Al Jazeera Mubasher: Let’s start with the latest developments in Israel’s war against Gaza. Despite the agreement of the Palestinian resistance with the plan proposed by Qatar and Egypt to accept the ceasefire and end the war, Israel and the Netanyahu government insisted on entering Rafah and practically took control of the border crossing between Egypt and the Gaza Strip. How do you evaluate these developments in Iran?

Dr. Kharazi: The current situation shows that the Zionist regime is basically non-negotiable and only wants to achieve its goals by resorting to force. . Before this case, it was insisted that a guarantee should be provided for what is proposed as a ceasefire plan. Despite the acceptance of Egypt and Qatar’s plan for a ceasefire by Hamas, we have seen again that the Israeli regime has resorted to force. Therefore, the nature of such a regime is that it only wants to achieve its goals by using weapons. Earlier, in their negotiations with the Palestinians and in cases such as the Oslo agreement, we saw that they changed it with all kinds of tricks, so that the Oslo agreement became meaningless.

Question: So you in Iran believe that Israel is not serious about reaching an agreement with the Palestinian resistance to end the war against the Gaza Strip.

Answer: Netanyahu many times has announced that the goal of this regime is to destroy Hamas. Therefore, if he agrees to an agreement now, he will continue his attacks.

Question: Mr. Doctor; In this case, how do you see the agreement of the Palestinian resistance and the agreement of Hamas with the plan proposed by Qatar and Egypt? Do you believe that this action was a step in the right direction or not?

Answer: Hamas wanted to show its goodwill, but you witnessed the Israeli regime against The goodwill of Hamas resorted to force.

Question: Do you think America has the ability to put pressure on Netanyahu’s government to accept a ceasefire and enter into dialogue with the Palestinian resistance? ?

Answer: If America wants to put pressure on the Israeli regime, it must first stop sending weapons to this regime. It is very meaningless that on the one hand, it provides weapons and financial facilities to the Israeli regime, and on the other hand, in the propaganda scene, it wants to find a solution to this war in Gaza. America’s policy is exactly the same as Israel’s policy.

Question: But Israelis and even America have a specific view on the issue of Hamas survival and resistance with its current strength in Gaza; They say, how can we accept “one of Iran’s arms” that threatens Israel to be present on Israel’s borders and next to it in this way? What is your response to this statement?

Answer: Hamas is not a wing of Iran; Rather, Hamas consists of Palestinians. We have only supported Hamas, otherwise it is the Palestinians themselves who are fighting to liberate their lands.

Question: What is the nature of Iran’s support for Hamas?

Answer: Iran has provided any possible support to Hamas. If it is possible to send weapons to Hamas now, we will not hesitate. But there is no way to support Hamas with weapons.

Question: Does Hamas coordinate its military operations and political movements with you? Do they ask Iran’s opinion before any practical action?

Answer: No, they decide by themselves. Of course, we are in contact with the political office of Hamas and we talk and if we have any opinions, we will inform them, but they are the ones who make the decision, and to be fair, both Hamas and the people of Gaza had serious and unparalleled resistance. In these very difficult conditions, you saw that people make sacrifices, take care of the sick or the daily needs of others, and these are unique in history.

Question: Mr. Doctor, some It is said that Iran was expected to play a stronger role in reducing the intensity of this war against civilians and the Palestinian resistance in Gaza. That is, it was expected that Iran would have a clear and clear intervention against Israel in these events in order to reduce the severity of what is called “genocide” against the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip. Has Iran supported the Palestinian resistance in the war against Israel as much as it should?

Answer: We are politically supporting Hamas. The resistance axis also supports Hamas. Iran entering into a direct war with Israel is not our policy. Our policy is to prevent the spread of war, unless the Israeli regime wants to harm Iran’s interests. Just like when it attacked the Iranian embassy, ​​we gave a serious response to it in the True Promise operation. The Palestinian resistance and the Israeli occupiers should not be one side of the conflict.

Answer: This is the Palestinian war and our duty is only to support the Palestinians. We are not present in the war scene.

Question: Yes; I meant that you will not have a military presence and Iran will not fight for Palestine or for the Palestinian resistance; You consider this war as the war of the Palestinians and the war of the Palestinian resistance.

Answer: Yes, we will not hesitate to provide any support to the resistance axis, especially the Gaza war. Kurds.

Question: But some say that when Bashar al-Assad’s government was on the verge of collapse, Iran made various moves in Syria; sent forces, even from other countries; and provided unlimited military and political support [to the Syrian government], which ultimately helped prevent the fall and collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s regime. Some say that when Iran was able to provide such support to the Syrian government, why does it not provide such support to Hamas and the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip?

Answer: First, Syria is an established state. The Syrian government requested us to be present in this country and help the Syrian government against the terrorists, which was a very successful action. Hamas is not an established government, but a liberation movement. Of course, if there is a way to provide any weapons to Hamas, we will not hesitate, but at the moment we do not have access to Gaza.

Question: Is this issue about Hezbollah in South Lebanon is also true? Some say that the next step of Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu after the end of the war in the Gaza Strip and against Hamas will be to try to completely destroy Hezbollah. In this case, what will Iran do?

Answer: First, the Israeli regime has had very bitter experiences in the past wars with Hezbollah and will never forget these memories. Secondly, if the Israeli regime dares and wants to carry out large-scale attacks on Lebanon, it is not only Hezbollah’s duty to resist the attacks, but every Lebanese will consider himself obliged to defend his country in these attacks.

Question: But will the same principles of Iran’s policy regarding Israel’s war against the Palestinian resistance and Hamas also apply to Hezbollah? Will that war be only Hezbollah’s war? That means, despite supporting Hezbollah, if an all-out war breaks out between Hezbollah and Israel, you will not participate in the war alongside Hezbollah?

Answer: Our policy is non-proliferation. This war is in the entire region, unless the Americans and Israelis make such a decision, then we will naturally enter the war, and the same is the case with Hezbollah, and we will support Hezbollah, but Hezbollah is responsible for the defense of Lebanon. It is.

Question: Has the region passed the risk of all-out war? At the beginning of this war, the Americans constantly said that they do not want to see an all-out war in the region; We don’t want the war to spread from the Gaza Strip to Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Golan, etc. Do you think this phase is really over and there will not be an all-out war in the region?

Answer: No, this possibility has not been resolved yet. But both America, Iran and the countries of the region do not want this war to become widespread and do not consider it to be in their interest. Americans are spending their election year and their focus is on the Far East. Therefore, they do not know that it is in their interest to spread the war. They are aware of Iran’s capabilities, and in this operation, they saw what Iran’s capabilities are.

Question: In Iran’s Honest Promise operation, for the first time, the occupying regime of Israel was defeated from inside the soil. He made himself a target. Some say the operation was coordinated; Iran had informed the Americans, even through the mediation of the Israelis, and the countries in the region that it would carry out such an operation. So everyone knew about it. Not a single person was killed in Israel, and the Israelis declared that these drones and missiles did not pose a serious threat to us, and most of them, even more than 90%, did not reach Israel at all. I apologize for using this interpretation, but some say that this operation was more of a “demonstrative action” than a real and serious action against the Israeli occupiers. What is your answer?

Answer: First, we used only 20% of the resources we mobilized in this operation. If the Israeli regime responded, we could have carried out many more attacks. Of course, we did not want to kill people. Our only goal was to target the military centers of the Israeli regime. For this reason, we informed America and the countries of the region that this operation will be carried out and will be limited. It was really limited and we stopped the process after completing the operation. In this case, it was acted very carefully, both a significant response was given and it was done in such a way that it would not cause the spread of war throughout the region.

Question: Is Iran currently Is it changing the rules of the game in the region and the deterrence strategy between you and the occupying regime of Israel? You targeted the invaders from your soil, from inside Iran; Will this action be repeated again? Have you formed new rules between you and the occupying Israeli regime?

Answer: First, the deterrence of the Israeli regime disappeared on October 7. No one imagined that the Palestinians could carry out such an operation against this regime. You saw that the prestige and intelligence ability of the Israeli regime was destroyed and it could not predict and prevent such an operation. It was the same in the operation of True Promise, that is, the deterrence of the Israeli regime was eliminated. They realized that if Iran wants to respond, it has a high level of capability and can do so at the level of conventional operations, and they no longer have deterrence. It was for this reason that America, France, England and other such countries helped the Israeli regime in intercepting missiles. It is true that some of our missiles were hit, but for our purpose, the number of missiles was not important, but hitting the military centers was the target. We showed that we have the possibility to give a definitive answer to the Israeli regime and prevent its further attacks. Israel was said to have targeted some military facilities and even some nuclear facilities, notably in Isfahan, but Iran neither announced nor responded. Is this true or not?

Answer: What happened was the use of a small bird that had already been sent to Iran as a spy; Not to attack Israel. In the past, small birds were sent to Iran in some ways to carry out operations under certain conditions. These are actually harassing, otherwise it wouldn’t be considered a military operation, as their quadcopter couldn’t do any damage. This action was not against Iran’s nuclear facilities, but they wanted to target only one of the military bases. If they want to be bold and damage Iran’s nuclear facilities, our level of deterrence will be different. So far we have experienced deterrence at the conventional level, if they want to strike Iran’s nuclear capabilities, it can naturally change Iran’s nuclear doctrine.

Question: This is an important point, doctor. We are witnessing a change in Iran’s deterrence doctrine and Israel’s deterrence doctrine. If Israel targets Iran’s nuclear facilities, what exactly will you do?

Answer: Two years ago, in a conversation with Al Jazeera, I announced that Iran has the capacity to produce a nuclear bomb. has the Today we still have that capacity, but we have not decided to produce a nuclear bomb. But if Iran’s existence is threatened, we will have to change our nuclear doctrine. Recently, the military officials also announced that if Israel wants to attack nuclear facilities, it is possible and conceivable to revise Iran’s nuclear doctrine and policies and deviate from the previous declaration considerations.

Answer: Indirect talks between Iran and America are not a new issue. It has been in place for years and it is still in place today, whether through the Swiss Embassy, ​​which protects American interests in Iran, or through some countries in the region. In the recent cases, both Iran’s and America’s policies were based on preventing this war from expanding, and we had indirect talks with the United States in this regard.

Question: Do After the Al-Aqsa storm operation, the US secretly asked you not to support the resistance and Hezbollah widely so that Iran does not become the target of a direct attack by the US; Or not?

Answer: America cannot make such a request from us. We have the duty to defend the axis of resistance. If America has such a request from us, the answer is negative.

Question: Has America, again secretly, asked you to pressure the Houthis to carry out attacks? stop themselves against ships in the Red Sea; Or not?

Answer: No. Iran will not put such pressure on the Houthis. The Houthis are busy defending the axis of resistance and Yemen. This is their legal right to be able to play a role in the developments in the region.

Question: Yes, but the Americans didn’t ask you to put pressure on the Houthis?

Answer: It is possible that they wanted, for example, the Houthis to have some attention in the Red Sea operation. But we do not give orders to the Houthis and they act at their own discretion. If we have recommendations to the members of the resistance axis, it is a consultative aspect, otherwise the decision maker is the resistance axis itself, be it the Houthis, Hezbollah, Hamas, or the Iraqi resistance.

Question: Some doubting the significant capabilities of the Houthis in targeting ships, especially Israeli and even American ships in the past months, say how the Houthis can obtain this information that is not easy to obtain? Because they don’t have the facilities to do this. Also, where do they say they got these advanced guided missiles that have been able to hit so many Israeli and American ships? To put it quite clearly, they say that this is an all-Iranian action that is carried out using Ansar Allah. What is your answer?

Answer: All kinds of words are said in the propaganda scene, but the fact is that all Yemenis were underestimated. Yemenis are very intelligent people and when they are trained, they can produce the necessary weapons themselves and they are actually doing the same in this war. Yemen is a historical nation and has passed through a difficult time. Today, we see that despite the economic problems, they defend their identity and country and the axis of resistance. Yemenis should not be underestimated. Powerful people are very intelligent and powerful and determined to achieve their goals.

Question: Didn’t the Houthis coordinate this with you before starting these operations?

Answer: As I said, the axis of resistance never asks permission from Iran before taking action, but they are the decision makers themselves. They may consult and we consult, but they make their own decisions. Because they are in the field. We cannot give them specific advice from here.

Question: Do you agree with Ansar Allah’s operation in targeting Israeli, American, etc commercial ships? Do you support these actions?

Answer: Yes. We support this action politically. Because, of course, ships that help the Israeli regime to act against the Palestinian people and massacre them must be stopped. Ansarullah does the same thing by attacking the ships that go to the Israeli regime and wants to put more pressure on Israel by preventing these sea transfers.

Question: Some Arab countries and some neighboring countries, of which I can give Egypt as an example, are directly affected by Houthi attacks on ships, even if they are Israeli or American. According to some officials, Suez Canal revenues have decreased by 60%. When a large Arab and Islamic country has suffered from these actions and has demanded that they be stopped, shouldn’t you play a role and tell the Houthis to stop these actions so that more damage does not come to the Arab countries, especially Egypt?

Answer: Firstly, as a result of the Israeli regime’s attacks against the Palestinians, all countries have suffered losses. Secondly, war is war, and when it requires attacks, it naturally causes disruptions in the movement of others. By the way, it is the duty of all the countries of the region, including Egypt, to put more pressure on the Israeli regime so that the war ends and the countries of the region do not suffer.

Question: This point It brings us to another issue and that is Iran’s relationship with Egypt. It seems that these relations have improved a lot in the past years. A few months ago, a telephone call was made between the presidents of Iran and Egypt. High-ranking officials of the two countries have had meetings. What does Iran want from the relationship with Egypt today? What is Iran’s future goal and perspective for these relations?

Answer: We have always been interested in solving problems with Egypt. Even when I was the Minister of Foreign Affairs, I made a lot of efforts in this field. At the time of the late Ahmad Maher, who was the Minister of Foreign Affairs. I even met Mubarak at that time. But unfortunately, the Egyptians did not make a serious decision. Even today, Iran is interested in establishing its political relations with Egypt as a country with a great civilization, a very ancient history and a country with a militant people. Of course, at present, normal relations, visits, consultations and discussions are established to some extent, but it is not enough. Iran and Egypt are two important countries that should eventually establish their relationship.

Question: Are there any coordination between Iran and Egypt in order to stop Israel’s war against the Gaza Strip? Is there?

Answer: Yes, as far as the talks between the ministers of foreign affairs are concerned, it is established that they consult and consult with each other.

Question: What prevents the further development of relations between Iran and Egypt?

Answer: There have been differences in the past, mainly political and security differences. Is. Of course, these differences were resolved in the past in the conversations I had with Mr. Maher. A joint statement was even written, but in our opinion, in the end, the Egyptian intelligence services intervened and prevented the establishment of the relationship. Based on those records, today’s issues can be solved. It is enough for the two countries to decide to establish the relationship and if there are any differences, they will resolve them later. It seems that it has expanded and developed more than before. What are the latest developments in this field and where are these relations going?

Answer: The resumption of relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia was a very important step. Establishing relations was beneficial for both parties. Because in this turbulent region, the more cordial relations between countries, the better for the entire region. Even now, normal relations are being established and discussions for further cooperation are underway.

Question: Do you foresee that the relations between you and Saudi Arabia will expand further? /p>

Answer: Our plan is to improve relations and lead to more practical cooperation in economic, political and even regional security fields. We are fully prepared to interact and have serious discussions with Saudi Arabia.

Question: These days there is talk of normalizing relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel. Of course, Saudi Arabia has set conditions related to the current war, such as the end of the war, the cessation of genocide, and the issue of a solution between the two countries. But if Israel accepts the terms of Saudi Arabia and normalization takes place between the two sides, will this affect the relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia or not?

Answer: Something like this It will not be achieved simply, because the conditions set by Saudi Arabia are not possible. For example, the formation of two governments is not possible, neither from the point of view of the territory, nor from the point of view of the Israeli regime, which does not accept two governments. Therefore, it is important that there is a serious change in the entire region and that the rights of the Palestinians are secured so that they can have their own country in the entire occupied territories.

Question: In this Rasta, what is your view on the solution of two governments? Hamas itself has declared that it is ready to accept the two-state solution, that is, the formation of a Palestinian state within the borders of 1967, and in this case, this movement may even lay down its arms and become a political party. In your opinion, can this action by Hamas be correct or not?

Answer: The Palestinians are free to decide for themselves. We do not stop the Palestinians. They can decide and do whatever they want, but we, as those who oversee the issues of the region, do not consider two governments to be possible at all. This is not a new thing, but since 1947, when it was discussed in the UN General Assembly that one or two governments should be formed, the representative of Iran at the same time opposed the plan of two governments and gave a strange speech. At the same time, he predicted that with this plan, “you will create a stove under the ashes of which there will always be a bright fire that will threaten not only the Middle East, but also world peace.” He predicted that the two-state plan would lead to more bloodshed, genocide and more crime. Even today, we are of the opinion that ultimately what can bring security in the region is the creation of a government; A government where Muslims, Jews, Christians and all different tendencies live together in that government. Of course, this is simply not possible. Two governments are not possible. Its requirement is that America and the West stop supporting the Israeli regime and this regime is forced to give in to such a thing. Imagine if the formation of an independent Palestinian government is approved in the United Nations, this government wants land. How is land acquired? Currently, most of the land of Palestine is in the hands of settlers. This government wants an army, this government should be free and able to conclude an arms contract. This government wants space. Does the Israeli regime allow such a government to be created? Therefore, the plan of two governments is an impractical idea.

Question: Let me give an example; Suppose another government is at work in Israel – like Rabin’s government, which many say at that time could have moved towards this solution – and Israel agrees to a two-state solution and this agreement is such that it satisfies the Palestinians, will In this case, is it possible that we will witness the establishment of relations and normalization between Iran and Israel or not?

Answer: We do not recognize the Israeli regime. It is up to the Palestinians to decide for themselves. We consider Israel an occupier. Because Jewish immigrants came here from different countries and took over the houses and properties of Palestinians and killed them, and this killing continues. Therefore, we do not recognize such an existence.

Question: But today Israel is a reality that some say cannot be ignored. All the countries of the world, except you and a few other countries, have recognized it; Therefore, it is a fact. Why don’t you deal with this reality?

Answer: There are many unfavorable realities in the world, but it is not necessary to accept every unfavorable reality. We have our own policy.

Question: So Iran will never change its policy, will never recognize Israel and will not establish relations with it, even If one day he gives them the Palestinian state.

Answer: We are against the occupation; But it is up to the Palestinians themselves to decide what to do about their future.

Question: Let me address the American presence in the region, especially the military presence, which has recently The intensity has increased. Iran has repeatedly expressed its opposition to this presence. In light of this situation, when will you return to interaction with America? For example, will you ask the United States to withdraw its military presence in the region and move away from the axis of resistance in the region, so that in return, you return to the nuclear agreement? Or not?

Answer: Basically, we were never against negotiating with America to solve our problems, but America’s performance has led to us not having direct negotiations with America. . Because America always resolves issues by resorting to force, if the relationship is based on the principle of equality, mutual respect and non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries, the relationship between Iran and America and other countries will have its natural form. The problem is that America considers itself a world power and wants to impose its will on Iran with zero and bullying. Unfortunately, we faced this phenomenon from the beginning of the revolution and we always had problems with America, because they were not willing to respect Iran’s demands.

Question: Is Iran following Is it creating a new world system that is not unipolar? Are you looking for this in cooperation with, for example, Russia and China?

Answer: Yes, this is not the only desire of Iran. Many countries believe that the time of a single world is over. America is not the former America, nor are other countries the former countries. Countries have reached maturity and want their own independence. Even in this region, we see that countries are experiencing such political maturity. Therefore, the problem is that naturally we cannot be silent in the face of a unipolar world. We want a multipolar world. As Russia and China have the same desire. Many other countries, even India, want such a system. Our prediction is exactly that the world will be multi-polar in the future and regional powers will play their role in this multi-polar world. In the sensitive region of the Middle East, the countries of the region must solve their problems and establish a more serious coordination so that they can defend their rights in that multipolar international system.

Question : America has accused Iran of providing military support and drones to Russia in the war against Ukraine. Is this true?

Answer: The responsible authorities announced their opinion on this matter and it is not new. We had given drones to Russia before the Ukraine war, and we did not know about Russia’s intention to go to war. Therefore, it is Russia itself that is now using its facilities against Ukraine and against the West’s support for Ukraine. It has been successful so far, so that it has been able to stabilize its position in the lands it has occupied.

Question: After the start of the Russian war against Ukraine Has Iran provided military support to Russia or not?

Answer: The officials announced that after the initial support to Russia, it did not continue. .

Question: Some may say that this is a kind of double standards on the part of Iran. This means that Iran’s position regarding the occupation of Palestinian lands by Israel is clear and this country is against the occupation of Palestine. But at the same time, you are somehow providing the means for Russia to occupy the territory of Ukraine. How do you explain this, which seems to be a kind of double standards?

Answer: We do not justify the occupation, but basically it was a trap of America and NATO that Russia to enter the war Because they wanted to expand NATO to the borders of Russia. Russia was forced to resist this Western program and enter Ukraine. Finally, we hope that the war will end, so we do not agree with the occupation.

Question: So you do not approve of the occupation of Ukrainian territory by Russia. Is my understanding correct?

Answer: We do not approve the occupation of other lands, unless some parts want to leave that country due to cultural or religious issues. leave and join another country. Now some parts of Ukraine have such a claim. Once the war is over, these issues can be examined.

Question: Mr. Doctor, from your answer, it seems that you provide justifications for the occupation, such as cultural, religious and historical If we accept these justifications, for example, Turkey can claim that it has rights in other countries that it rules over. You can also say this in Iran. Also Egypt, and others. These seem to be justifications for the occupation of a country by another country. The fact is that some people describe these justifications as – not immoral, but at least – irrational.

Answer: We do not justify the occupation, but the reality of the war in Ukraine. And we explain to Russia why the war happened. NATO wanted to get closer to Russia’s borders with the support of America. This was against their previous contracts, which said that such a thing would not happen. So they created conditions to get closer, and Russia resisted this plan for its own interests and had to enter the territory of Ukraine; But what Russia is currently occupying, what will happen in the future, are discussions that should be done after the end of the war. Therefore, this does not mean Iran’s approval of occupation.

Question: If a real military confrontation between the United States and China occurs, which is a possibility, Iran along with Will China stand up or will it take a neutral position?

Answer: We will support China politically, but China has enough facilities to defend itself.

Question: Iranians like to surprise! You gave drones to Russia, which is a big country and a superpower, and they used them in Ukraine. I want to say that Iran has huge possibilities and can even help the superpowers. Isn’t it like this?

Answer: If Iran has such good facilities and everyone is worried about those facilities, they should interact with them and prevent pressure on Iran. But unfortunately, America is putting all kinds of pressures, of course pressures that according to themselves have failed. has worried some of Iran’s neighbors. Some of Iran’s neighbors say that your country has brought chaos to several countries in the region; For example, Yemen, Iraq, Syria, etc. This has worried the countries of the region. This causes the countries of the region to have strong relations with America or even to normalize relations with Israel. Some ask when will Iran give up this policy so that it can be an acceptable neighbor to its neighbors and this challenge ends.

Iran’s power is to defend itself and its interests. We have never used this power against the countries of the region, unless they go to war with Iran. Iraq went to war with Iran during Saddam’s time and Iran responded strongly. Even in this operation, we informed the countries of the region that this operation is not against them. As long as there is a normal relationship between Iran and the countries of the region and they cooperate, there is no need to worry about Iran’s power. Iran’s power is against its enemies.

Question: Yes; But is it possible that Iran will one day consider giving up the policy of cooperation with armed groups in some countries in the region that are somehow related to Iran? Is it possible for Iran to stop doing this and instead normalize its relations with these countries so that we can witness a real coalition among the countries of the region? Mr. Doctor, is it possible for Iran to think of such a thing?

Answer: The resistance forces in any country they are in are not against that country. The resistance forces are against Israel. The usurping Israeli regime that has taken over Palestinian lands, the resistance forces consider it their duty to fight against the Israeli regime. This does not mean that they are fighting against their own countries. Therefore, it is only a capacity that has been created against the aggression of the Israeli regime.

Question: I have taken up a lot of your time and we don’t have a few more minutes. But some may say about what you have done in Syria that today – as you know better than I do – many Syrians believe that by interfering in Syria, Iran directly involved in the bloodshed of hundreds of thousands of people and is directly responsible for it. has it. What is your answer to this statement?

Answer: Suppose that when ISIS was near Damascus, it took Damascus. What would happen to all Syrians then? Iran, which entered the country at the invitation of the Syrian government, was able to help establish the government and create security in the region. Be it Mr. Bashar Assad, government officials, or the Syrian people, everyone was and still is appreciative of Iran’s participation in this defense against terrorism. Of course, there may also be opposing opinions, especially since the Israeli and American regimes are spreading such ideas and, considering the vast propaganda machine they have, they want the security support of Syria and our advisory forces, which are there, to be removed from the scene.

Question: Excuse me, I don’t want to prolong the conversation on this topic, but some say that ISIS was supposed to do more in Syria than killing hundreds of thousands of people and displacing them. Millions of people committed by the Syrian government? And you supported a government that some believe killed its own people. Before asking the last question, do you have an explanation about this point?

Answer: If the Syrian government had not defended itself like this, naturally Syria would have failed and its security would have failed. It was completely destroyed. This was Israel’s wish. One of the reasons why we rushed to Syria’s aid was so that the plan of the US and the Israeli regime would fail and Syria would be able to maintain its identity and independence. Therefore, it is true that people are killed in every war, but this cannot be blamed on the Syrian government. The Israeli regime and the terrorists who acted against the independent government of Syria should be stopped. It is natural that the government has the duty to fight against terrorism, although innocent people may also perish in this war.

Question: Hundreds of thousands of people are not some people. ! These were the people who were killed. Many innocent people were killed and displaced. I will not continue this matter further. I want to return to the issue of Gaza. What is your prediction for the future of this war, which has not stopped after 215 days and has left thousands of dead and wounded among civilians? In your view, how will this war end?

Answer: First, it is the terrorists who created this situation in Syria and the supporters of those terrorists. If human beings are killed, it is the responsibility of the terrorists and their supporters. Regarding the Gaza war, so far this war has shown that the Israeli regime has failed and has not achieved any of its goals. Destruction, bombing, killing and genocide are not victories, they are crimes. The Israeli regime has not achieved and will not achieve any of the military goals it announced, because Hamas cannot be destroyed. Hamas showed that despite all the pressure and war and bloodshed, it remains a strong force and enjoys the support of the people, not only in Gaza, but in the whole of Palestine. 75% of the Palestinian people support Hamas and therefore it will play a role in the future of Palestine. The Israeli regime has not only not won the war, but also failed in public opinion. Today, everyone in the world is working against Israel’s aggression. Even Mr. Trump said that the Israeli regime has failed in the field of public opinion. This is the fact that this regime has failed. Therefore, it is necessary for the United States and Europe to stop supporting Israel and provide the conditions to end this war and prepare for the establishment of peace and security.

end of message/