Ulyanov’s reaction to the presentation of a possible resolution at the meeting of the Board of Governors

according to the report of Tasnim news international group, Mikhail Ulyanov Russia’s representative to the international organizations in Vienna regarding the possibility of issuing a resolution against Iran at the meeting of the Board of Governors wrote in his official account on Program X: The June meeting of the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency will begin tomorrow. It cannot be expected to be noise-free. An anti-Iranian resolution can be presented.

He added: I hope this will not happen. Such a resolution cannot bring positive results, but it can seriously worsen the situation.

Last days, the confidential report of the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency was presented to the members of the Board of Governors. And in this regard, some details were published by the western media.

In the meantime, some media, including the Wall Street Journal, reported and whispered about the program. European countries published a resolution against Iran in the Council of Governors and also claimed that America is against the approach of three European countries, England, Germany and France, regarding the adoption of a resolution against Iran.

According to a Wall Street Journal report, the British and the French have told Washington of their intention for a harsh resolution against Iran. Also, this media added that America has pressured a number of other countries to abstain in this meeting, unlike the previous times and the pressure it exerted before every meeting of the Council of Governors.

In the meantime, the western countries, which are taking a technical measure to confuse the internal situation of Iran and also influence the election process in Iran, should pay attention to this point, considering the experience of the previous times that in 2019 and 1401 happened, if they try to issue a resolution, Iran will also react and this issue will be to their own detriment rather than to Iran, and they agree that creating a political cost for Iran will cause a cost against them. .