The assassination of Haniyeh does not go unanswered/ the dual approach of the West towards terrorism
Mehr News Agency, International Service-Piman Yazdani: The morning of Wednesday, August 10th, Martyr Ismail Haniyeh, Chief of Staff A Hamas politician who had traveled to Tehran to attend the official inauguration ceremony of the Iranian president was assassinated. This terrorist act faced global and regional reactions from the very early hours, and each resistance group in separate messages condemned this terrible crime, which took place along with the violation of the territory of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and emphasized on revenge for the blood of Martyr Haniyeh. In this regard mehr reporter had a conversation with “Ivan Zakharov”, the head of the Middle East department of Sputnik.
Next we read this interview:
Why does the Zionist regime commit cowardly assassinations instead of a field battle? Are these actions the result of the weakness and failure of the Zionists in achieving their goals on the battlefield?
Israel resorts to targeted assassinations of Hezbollah and Hamas leaders for strategic purposes. These terrorist acts will not go unanswered. We see that Israel has once again escalated the tension in the Middle East region.
On the one hand, the Zionist regime and the United States demand negotiations, a ceasefire and peace, and on the other hand They do such provocative actions. What consequences can these actions have in the region?
The actions of Israel, which on the one hand calls for negotiations and a peaceful settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, and at the same time attempts to assassinate the leaders of Hamas and Hezbollah. , can have complex consequences for the region. First, such actions can increase violence. The removal of group leaders often leads to immediate backlash from their supporters, which can lead to attacks on Israeli and American targets. Second, it can increase anti-Western sentiments in the region. Thirdly, targeted killings in the long run can make peaceful resolution of conflicts more difficult and lead to instability in the region.
How do you evaluate the dual approach of the Westerners to the issue of terrorism, especially state terrorism?
The dual approach of the West towards terrorism, especially state terrorism, has been very controversial and has had many consequences. On the one hand, Western countries such as the United States and its allies actively support the global fight against terrorism and emphasize the importance of international law and human rights, but on the other hand, these same Western countries take actions that are a clear example of double standards in The issue is terrorism. This dual approach complicates the global fight against terrorism for various reasons.
