Zelensky’s challenge request to Biden / NATO-Russia war is coming?

Mehr News Agency, International Group: The security and economic consequences of the confrontation between Ukraine and Russia for Western countries, today It is increasing day by day. In the meantime, the new idea of ​​the commanders of the Ukrainian forces to prevent Russia’s advance in the east is viewed with skepticism, because they believe that the Ukrainian army is not capable of facing Russia with the current situation, and it is necessary to attack targets deep in Russia. use long-range missiles.

Although some of these weapons have already been provided to Ukraine, the permission to shoot is in the hands of Ukraine’s western partners, and they agreed to this request by President Volodymyr Zelensky. Ukraine has a lot of fear.

Associated Press has announced in a report that the officials of Kiev, in a conversation with the US and EU leaders, have argued that the use of these weapons is vital. But on the other side, Russia has warned that it considers the authorization of long-range attacks as an act of war and prepares a crushing response.

The long-range weapons donated to Ukraine mean long-range missiles including systems such as English Storm Shadow and SCALP, similar to France, or the American ATACMS tactical missile system. The ultimate goal of using these weapons is to attack points at a distance of 155 miles to slow down the Russian advance and give breathing space to the besieged Ukrainian forces.

Putin’s warning to the West

Anthony Blinken and David Lemmy, the foreign ministers of the United States and the United Kingdom, during the past few days, regarding the issue of issuing a license to use long-range weapons for Ukraine’s attack on Russia, with ambiguous literature and They commented anonymously and their words showed that Washington and London cannot easily decide on this issue.

But the Russian President Vladimir Putin’s literature on this issue was completely clear. In response to reporters’ questions, he said: “If those countries give such permission to Ukraine, we will consider such an action as a direct war between Russia and the West.” Kiev needs NATO’s satellite and equipment help to attack us, and this will mean NATO’s direct intervention in the war. Without the help of NATO military forces and intelligence, such attacks would be futile. NATO members should ask themselves whether they really want a direct war against Russia

Putin has openly announced that the direct entry of the US and other members into the war against Russia will change the nature, intensity and conditions of the war. This tough Putin means that the Russian military is ready to deal with possible Ukrainian and NATO missile attacks and is not afraid of the consequences. Of course, it is not only Putin who has responded to Ukraine. In an interview with Izvestia newspaper, Dmitry Peskov, the spokesman of the Kremlin, announced that if the permission to use missiles is issued, the Western countries will change from the level of supporters of Ukraine to the level of direct parties to the war, and Russia will give the necessary response.

But the statements of Dmitry Medvedev, the former president of Russia and the deputy of the Security Council of this country, were sharper than Putin and Peskov, and he specifically reacted to the British positions on Ukraine. . In his message on X social network, Medvedev wrote about the promise of British Foreign Minister David Lemmy’s hundred-year support to Ukraine: “He is lying, the country called Ukraine will not see the next 25 years.” In a few years, the island of England itself will also sink. But if necessary, we can help sink England with our hypersonic missiles.”

Meanwhile, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov announced that NATO members are already coordinating the necessary information for Ukraine’s attacks on Russian civilian facilities. Lavrov also announced that some Ukrainian security agents are working in Idlib and other regions of Russia to recruit and transfer members of the extremist group Tahrir al-Sham or Al-Nusra to the battlefield against Russia. But the most important part of Lavrov’s words is that, from his point of view, the West has reached a conclusion and final decision to remove the restrictions on the use of long-range weapons to attack Russian territory, and such an action may lead to a disaster like Chernobyl, which, first of all, Europe It will suffer”.

Are America and England hesitant?

The issue of issuing a missile attack license to Russia cast a shadow on the meeting between US President Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer yesterday.

In an interview with reporters at the White House, Starmer called the coming weeks a critical period during the Russian-Ukraine war and emphasized the importance of supporting Kiev’s needs. But Biden chose not to make a clear comment about Russia and only said: “I don’t think much about Putin.” Of course, the problem here is that the United States and the United Kingdom do not agree on the use of missiles, and it is clear that the United Kingdom has more momentum to issue a license. But since the core technology of the so-called “Storm Shadow” weapons is American-made, Washington must have the last word. And in a situation where America is facing big problems such as the consequences of supporting the crimes of the Zionist regime of Israel and in the election competition between Democrats and Republicans, the issue of the war in Ukraine is still an important factor, which can affect the votes and attitudes of American citizens. leave it.

The American publication Politico reported from some diplomatic sources that the White House is drawing a road map, based on its provisions, some restrictions on how Ukraine’s use of US-donated weapons should be removed. But at the same time, possible consequences should also be predicted.

Politico had already announced in a report that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, in a conversation with the President and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, detailed about long-range weapons with They have spoken. Although Michael McCall, the chairman of the foreign relations committee of the US House of Representatives, previously said that Blinken clearly agreed to the use of long-range ATACMS missiles, White House sources did not confirm these statements.

Of course, it is not only the United States and England that cannot easily decide to support Ukraine’s missile attack on Russia. The two European actors of this war, Germany and France, are also facing many security restrictions. For example, for a long time, German Defense Ministry experts believe that this country should refrain from sending long-range Taros missiles to Ukraine. because it will bring the escalation of international tension.

It is in such a situation that the Western countries, in order to distort the global public opinion, have raised the fake issue of Iran sending missiles to Russia, and at the same time, NATO, by publishing a statement, again accused Russia declared as the biggest and most serious threat. NATO has claimed that Russia is looking for a fundamental change in the Euro-Atlantic security structure, and this is a permanent threat.