The dismissal of “Galant” and the escalation of differences between the Zionist authorities
Mehr News Agency, International Group: The news of the dismissal of Yoav Gallant, Minister of War of the Zionist regime, is an important news bomb No one expected it. As a veteran general, Gallant was removed and replaced by Cutts, who previously served as secretary of state and is known as a loyalist of the prime minister, but who has little knowledge of military matters and is expected to make major decisions in this area. , be at the disposal of Netanyahu himself. Cutts’ vacancy in the Foreign Ministry post was also given to Gideon Sa’ar, who used to be Netanyahu’s rival, but now he has pulled the plug on the dispute.
Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister of the Zionist regime, dismissed the minister of war, while the army of this regime is like a worn-out war machine, on both the fronts of Palestine and Lebanon, with He is facing high losses, heavy losses and a weak record. However, the range of differences was so wide that there was no other way. Al Jazeera pointed out that the apparent differences between Netanyahu and Gallant are a reflection of the wider rift between the right-wing ruling coalition and those army commanders who have long been in favor of reaching an agreement to stop the attack on Gaza and return the prisoners. Gallant repeatedly objected to the continuation of the “war without a clear direction”, but Netanyahu has always emphasized that the war will only stop when Hamas is completely destroyed; That is, the same goal that even the army commanders do not believe in the possibility of its realization.
The report of the Associated Press reporter showed that the differences in the cabinet also have a social reflection, and the demonstration of thousands of Zionists who support Gallant in protest against Netanyahu’s recent decision is a part of the impact of the differences. The politicians of the Zionist regime are fans on the hostile fronts.
The gap that won’t close
Trying to analyze the background of Benjamin Netanyahu’s decision is the main source of analytical reports about this event. The Jerusalem Post reported that there is a “crisis of distrust” and strategic differences between Netanyahu and Gallant, and the Prime Minister of the Zionist regime believes that Gallant’s war logic is based on the continuation of the offensive campaign against Hamas without clear goals and something like that. , carries the risk of prolonging the conflict without providing security for Israeli prisoners. All this while the families of Israeli prisoners have repeatedly demonstrated in front of Netanyahu’s house and consider him to be the main person responsible for endangering the lives of the prisoners.
When in June of this year, the war cabinet was dissolved by order of Netanyahu, this fact was revealed to the international system that even the heavy and historic operation “Tufan al-Aqsa” “, did not close the gap of differences in the ranks of the Zionist regime and Israel is going through the most difficult period of its fake life. But now, considering the lack of results in the field and heavy defeats on both fronts, we can conclude that the dismissal of the Minister of War is an event that is even more important than the dissolution of the War Cabinet, and Benjamin Netanyahu, who failed to fulfill any of his promises, actually It goes towards the end of the tunnel.
What does the extreme right want?
Gallant’s dismissal has been widely reflected in the world media and the common denominator of most reports and analyzes is that the disagreement over the continuation of Gallant’s activity or the option of his dismissal from Before long, it had become a serious point of contention. CNN World Service pointed out that the extreme right members of Netanyahu’s cabinet had pressured him to send Gallant home as soon as possible. One of these extremists was the Minister of Internal Security of the Zionist regime, Itmar Ben Gower, who, in his own words, congratulated Netanyahu for this “beneficial and bold decision” and accused Gallant of being an important obstacle to achieving “complete victory”.
The extreme right current of the Zionist regime has challenged Gallant as the main factor in the failure to achieve victory, and even now, Gallant’s orders and record have made him as the commander of war crimes and the killing of civilians. But Ben Guerr and others are not satisfied even with this level of crime and violence and want the bombing of civilians, the genocide of Palestinians and the attempt to occupy parts of Lebanon to continue with more intensity.
Two important factors; Suspicion and failure
Benyamin Netanyahu’s personal situation, both in terms of legal accusations and political psychology decisions, is a matter that needs serious reflection because he is now in a much more difficult situation. It has already been established and is waging a vast war on two fronts, which has not achieved results in any of them. As a result, it is quite natural that on the one hand he distrusts his fellow party officials and on the other hand, he looks for the culprits to cover up the mistakes and wrong decisions.
According to “Israel Times” analyst David Horowitz, Gallant will not be the last minister and official to be deposed, and Netanyahu is likely to have several other officials. put aside Chief of Staff Herzi Holloway and even Shabak head Ronen Baar are at the top of the list of people who are likely to be Bibi’s next detractors, as he has always sought to place maximum blame on the security establishment. Meanwhile, the conditions in the field are not going in favor of Netanyahu and the army, and the military and middle-ranking commanders prefer obeying the orders of an old commander over obeying an inexperienced minister.
Netanyahu’s team is likely to carry out heavy-handed operations against civilians in Gaza and Beirut in the coming days to suggest that Gallant had wavered in his attacks and now, the new minister Looking for a new design. But such an idea is already doomed to failure, and without a doubt, the Zionist regime is in the most difficult political, economic and security conditions.
