Gallant’s dismissal; The crisis of mistrust in the occupied lands increased

reported by Mehr News Agency quoted Al-Mayadeen, it is necessary to find out the real reasons for Netanyahu’s action in dismissing Yoaf Galant, the Minister of War of the Zionist regime, that too with the knowledge of The possible consequences of this decision on the creation of chaos in the streets of the lands occupation and its effect on the relations between the political and security levels of the regime should be investigated.

Netanyahu’s justification for removing Gallant and replacing Israel Katz Due to the “lack of trust” between them, it does not seem sufficient for such an action at a time when the Zionist regime is facing dangerous challenges.

Challenges that have expanded from internal disputes and fierce resistance on the fronts of Lebanon and Gaza to the confrontation with the Islamic Republic of Iran and the impact of the US presidential election on bilateral relations, and regardless of what If someone enters the White House, it will influence the policies of this regime.

Zionist media have evaluated this decision as an internal political choice to maintain Netanyahu’s power. But this analysis cannot understand the real dimensions of this decision; Especially considering that Netanyahu recently passed the risk of being removed due to the assassination of the leaders of Hezbollah and Hamas and the destruction of Hezbollah’s missile capability inside the Zionist regime. Also, the lack of real solidarity among Zionist opponents has put him in a strong position.

Therefore, it is necessary to examine the real reasons for Netanyahu’s action in dismissing Gallant; An action that can create chaos in the streets of the occupied lands and the relationship between the regime’s political and security institutions.

In this context, we should also mention the coalition of Netanyahu’s cabinet, which is based on the alliance with the so-called religious parties, which are made up of right-wing Zionist extremists.

The influence of Smotrich and Ben Goyer in Cabinet decisions and approaches are clearly seen. With the presence of Gideon Saar, the leader of the right-wing National Party, in the Foreign Ministry, Netanyahu was able to stabilize the cabinet. guarantee himself and form a far-right government that supports non-military service for Haredis and the continuation of his aggressive policies.

Behind the scenes of Gallant’s dismissal

YOF Gallant has so far reacted calmly to his dismissal, claiming that his goal is to preserve a “strong Israel”. is! He announced in a statement that his priority for 50 years was “Israel and its army”.

Gallant summarized the reasons for his disagreement with Netanyahu in three issues, namely the Haredi military service, the return of prisoners, and the investigation into the reasons for the failure that led to the success of the Al-Aqsa Storm operation; But the complexities in this regime show that other factors were also involved in this decision.

Netanyahu, who from the beginning of his entry into politics and holding the position of prime minister, has wanted to redefine the regime’s social contract with an extreme Zionist perspective, had the idea that the “Aqsa Storm” operation was an ideal opportunity to create The internal fundamental changes and the realization of “Greater Israel” (the project from the Nile to the Euphrates); An ominous goal that Netanyahu sees as a dream and hopes to bring the Zionist regime to a position that does not require past compromises and has a high influence in the region.

While Netanyahu considers himself to represent a point of view that does not believe in a two-state solution and adheres to the Judaization of the regime as a principle, he has recently tried to present himself as a leader who seeks It is a new birth for the Zionist regime and considers any kind of compromise with the issue of Palestinian rights as treacherous. Of course, this does not mean accepting the establishment of the Palestinian state by Gallant and his associates.

The difference of views in the meantime is based on the acceptance and observance of international conditions, which the moderate flow of the Zionist regime pays attention to. This stream tries to align with some international realities in a symbolic way to strengthen the regime’s position on the world stage.

Therefore, the difference between Gallant and Netanyahu cannot be limited to the lack of internal agreement during the war; Rather, these differences are rooted in the methodological contradictions between the two trends, each of which represents a different image of the Zionist regime that seeks dominance and survival.

An important feature of Netanyahu’s recent decision is the choice of time to remove Gallant. This decision was made shortly after the disclosure of confidential documents by Netanyahu’s office staff and the issuance of 7,000 conscription orders for Haredis by Gallant, and at the same time as the US presidential election. These factors indicate Netanyahu’s attempt to avoid a strong American reaction and take advantage of the situation to justify this decision as a normal regime change.

In this context, protest demonstrations against Gallant’s dismissal may be seen as one of Netanyahu’s goals in making this decision.

By putting the security of the Zionist regime under threat in the streets, the security apparatus will have to accept Netanyahu’s decision to prevent the popular protests from turning into a conflict between the opposition to the removal and the extreme right supporters. At the same time, Netanyahu’s opponents have not been able to show real unity, and for example, the failed general strike in September showed that Netanyahu can exploit this weakness and show his strength and popularity.

While the Zionist media and opponents may consider this decision to serve Netanyahu’s personal interests, the fact should not be ignored that this decision is in line with the extreme right-wing ideology of the Zionist regime. With the domination of the far-right government over the security and military apparatuses and the current government coalition, it will be easier to control the internal space of this regime and advance a new social contract for this regime.

Therefore, if the opposition obeys expediency in the field of security and accepts Netanyahu’s decision to continue his rule, the upcoming elections Knesset in 2026 will become a tool to stabilize the extreme right and promote Netanyahu to a position higher than the original founders of the Zionist regime.