New details of Tel Aviv’s strange terms for a ceasefire in Lebanon
According to Webangah News quoted by Mehr News Agency, citing Al Jazeera, the Zionist Kan network announced that it has obtained new details of the proposed ceasefire plan in Lebanon. According to this plan, five thousand Lebanese forces will be stationed in the southern regions of this country.
Also, the Zionist regime will pledge not to attack Lebanon and the land borders between this country and the Zionist regime will be redrawn!
The media of the Zionist regime announced the new trip of Amos Hochstein, the envoy of the US President, to Lebanon and the occupied territories on Wednesday.
It was previously announced that based on the ceasefire proposal, the two sides should emphasize the importance of UN Resolution 1701. They can defend themselves if necessary. The Lebanese army will be the only armed force in the south of the country alongside the UN forces. The government of this country should monitor any operation of arms sales in Lebanon or its production.
The Zionist regime must withdraw its forces from southern Lebanon within a week. The Lebanese army will replace these forces, and the United States and other countries will take responsibility for monitoring the implementation of this process. The country of Lebanon must disarm any unofficial military group in its south within 2 months.
While Lebanon’s Hezbollah has repeatedly stated its opposition to withdrawing to the north of the Litani River, preventing the reconstruction of its positions in this area and its disarmament But the Zionist regime is trying to retain the right to attack Hezbollah’s positions even after signing the aforementioned agreement.
Lebanon Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri stated that the American proposal for a ceasefire requires the formation of a committee of Western countries to monitor the implementation of UN Resolution No. 1701, and emphasized that this The issue is unacceptable for Lebanon.
He also emphasized that the inclusion of any clause regarding the freedom of action of the Zionist army in Lebanon is unacceptable and cannot even be discussed because it is considered an infringement of Lebanon’s sovereignty. It will be.
