Why did America give Ukraine a green light for long-range weapons?

Mehr News Agency, International Group: «Volodymyr Zelensky” President of Ukraine always during the war in his statements about the West’s reluctance to provide permission to use long-range weapons to attack deep into Russian soil. criticized and demanded the granting of this permission to attack airports, missile launchers and ammunition tanks, fuel depots and important Russian command and control centers.

Now that almost a thousand days have passed since the start of the war, reports indicate that Washington has authorized the use of missiles ATACMS (ATACMS) manufactured by America has been exported to attack deep in the Russian soil; Missiles with a range of 300 km (190 miles).

Yesterday, “New York Times” reported, citing informed American officials, that Biden The Ukrainian army’s use of US-made Atkoms missiles to attack deep into Russian territory, strengthening Kiev’s military positions in this conflict and increasing the control of Ukrainian forces over the region style=”text-a..”>Kursk confirmed Russia and canceled all restrictions in this regard.

The French newspaper “Figaro” also wrote in a report: “Following the issuance of a license for Ukraine to use American long-range weapons to attack military targets deep in Russian soil from the air

span style=”text-a..”>Biden President of the United States, Paris and London also issued permission for Kiev to use long-range weapons donated by France and England.

While London has issued permission to use “Storm Shadow” missiles to attack targets in Russia, previously according to London’s policy, Ukrainian forces could use British weapons. use them on Russian soil, and they could not use the long-range missiles of Shadow Storm to attack targets inside Russia’s borders.

On the other hand, French President Emmanuel Macron, referring to the reports about Joe Biden’s decision, the President of the United States has described this decision as “correct” regarding the green light for Ukraine to use the long-range weapons made by the United States deep in the territory of Russia!

After this news, some media sources announced that on Tuesday, October 19 (Aban 29), Ukraine fired American missiles of the ATKMS fired at Briansk region inside Russian territory. This is Ukraine’s first missile attack on Russia since the US gave Ukraine permission to use long-range missiles.

What goals are being targeted in Russia with this license?

Having announced this news, ISW, a Washington-based Institute for the Study of War, has published a map of all possible targets that Ukraine could attack.

According to this institute, at least 245 known military and paramilitary sites of Russia are within the range of Atcoms missiles. Ukraine, especially the 300 km range type. Among these places, there are only 16 air bases from which Russia has transferred almost all of its aircraft.

According to geographical research ISW if the restrictions are only for the area Kursk is removed, Kyiv will have access to 15 known locations there.

At least 11 other sites had been identified by the end of August as “land with are known as “military”; Areas that are used for military training and testing.

Moscow’s reaction to the West’s permission to use long-range weapons by Ukraine

Kremlin has always emphasized that the use of American long-range missiles against Russia will lead to an increase in tension and the promise of an “appropriate response” if Ukraine attacks its territory with these types of missiles. given.

“Vladimir Putin” the President of Russia earlier in a statement stating that providing permission to Ukraine to use long-range missiles to attack targets on our soil is a direct participation NATO member countries are at war against Russia, he emphasized: this issue will significantly change the nature of the conflict.

The President of Russia not long ago in an interview with the Russian state television, pointing out that the Ukrainian army is not able to independently use Western missile systems for such attacks without the intervention of NATO troops. , said: If Kiev attacks deep into Russian territory using long-range missiles donated by Western countries, then taking into account the changing nature of the conflict, we will make appropriate decisions based on the threats we will face.

Another important issue is the change of nuclear doctrine by Russia, which Kremlin officials have always warned the West about. At the beginning of October this year, during the meeting of the Russian National Security Council, Putin proposed to discuss the updating of the foundations of Russian government policy in the field of nuclear doctrine.

Putin said Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in the face of foreign aggression, including when enemies use conventional and non-nuclear weapons. create a vital threat against Russia.

In this connection, “Dmitry Pskov” the spokesman of the Kremlin also stated that Moscow’s decision to update Russia’s nuclear doctrine is derived from the positions that Western countries have taken against this country.

This happened on Tuesday (November 29) at the same time as the thousandth day of the Ukrainian war and exactly one day after chicken America’s green to Ukraine for the use of long-range weapons occurred. Putin signed a decree under which Moscow will now be allowed to use its nuclear weapons against “a non-nuclear state” provided that state has the support of nuclear powers.

This updated Russian nuclear doctrine outlines the threats that would prompt the Kremlin to consider a nuclear attack, and states that any attack by conventional missiles, drones or other aircraft could be met in accordance with this criteria should be considered.

It has also been said that any aggression against Russia by a country that is a member of a coalition, from Moscow’s point of view, will be considered as aggression against Russia by the entire coalition.

At the same time, Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to aggression against Belarus as a member of the Union, even using conventional weapons. . Previously, such an action could only be taken in response to the use of nuclear weapons against Russia’s allies.

The West’s behind-the-scenes goals of issuing a license to use long-range weapons

One ​​of the most important reasons for this permission to Ukraine is closely related to Russia’s superior hand in the battlefield; A battle that the West is trying to balance with the aim of eroding the war and weakening Moscow.

Until now, Russia has under its control about 16-18% of the territory of Ukraine. This amount includes the areas captured after the February 2022 attack and parts of Ukraine that were captured by the Russians earlier in 2014, including the Crimean peninsula.

At the beginning of this war, Russia managed to capture about 27% of the territory of Ukraine, but during 2023 and 2024, this amount decreased. The currently occupied areas include parts of Donetsk, Luhansk, a..”>Zaporigya and Khorson; These areas are equivalent to approximately 90,000 square kilometers of Ukrainian soil, and a major part of it includes industrial and strategic areas in the south and east of the country.

In recent months, the name of “Kursk” in Russia has been heard more than any other region. In August 2024, Ukrainian forces began a large-scale operation in the Kursk region of Russia, covering about 1,100 km They occupied a square of Russian territory for a short time. However, there are reports of recapture of parts of these areas by Russian forces. Russia has so far taken back about half of the territories lost during Ukraine’s surprise attack on Kursk. has taken.

Therefore, according to what the media, commanders and forces of Russia and Ukraine report about the battlefield situation, Russia with its military superiority and the large number of its forces has gained achievements in this war, but Meanwhile, the situation for the Ukrainian army is not very satisfactory and the country’s army is still struggling with the lack of ammunition and forces.

Telegraph newspaper in a report referring to the victory of US President-elect Donald Trump in the presidential election and his plans to end the war in Ukraine writes: “The President of Russia 50,000 It has deployed forces to recapture the Kursk region, and probably before Trump’s inauguration, Russia will completely liberate this region.”

America Biden and European allies, understanding the dimensions of Trump’s peace plan, are trying to seize territory to help Ukraine because the advisers of the new American president have announced that Zelensky should negotiate based on the current front lines.

From the perspective of observers, the West’s other possible goals of equipping Ukraine with long-range weapons and licensing their use could include a combination of strategic and tactical reasons. These actions can seek to pressure Russia to deter or change its position on the battlefield, or even force the Kremlin to change its approach in negotiations.

Inciting Russia to take hasty and ill-considered action and Moscow’s use of unconventional weapons and mass killing against Ukraine are among the other goals of the West for granting this controversial license. America Biden and its European allies are trying to legitimize their unquestioning support for Kiev and, while building a global coalition against Moscow, tie Trump’s hand to conclude a possible peace treaty. .