Trump in the idea of ​​forming an empire; From the acquisition of Greenland and Panama to the annexation of Canada and Mexico

Mehr News Agency, International Group, Hassan Shokohi Nasab: President Donald Trump selected America, which is supposed to return to the White House on January 20th (1st of Bahman), has fueled global concerns with some of its comments about its northern and southern neighbors as well as some other regions.

Trump recently said in an interview with the “NBC” news channel: “We subsidize more than 100 billion dollars a year to Canada.” We give Mexico 300 billion dollars in subsidies. If we are going to subsidize them, let them become US states.

Trump also revealed his expansionist tendencies regarding Greenland and the Panama Canal. In the view of observers, such policies are reminiscent of traditional imperialism and can endanger security in these regions.

Trump’s greedy eye for Greenland

Trump recently, in a move that caught the attention of the world’s media, once again proposed his plan to buy Greenland. Trump’s statements about the acquisition of Greenland, actually was one of the most controversial issues of his first term as president, which brought widespread reactions inside and outside the United States.

This proposal, which was proposed for the first time in 2019, was said to be aimed at expanding America’s geographic and strategic influence. Trump believed that Greenland could be a valuable asset for America due to its rich natural resources and strategic geographic location in the Arctic.

These statements, however, are strongly opposed by the Danish government, whose territory Greenland is a part of, faced became Danish officials called the idea “ridiculous” and emphasized that Greenland was not for sale. In addition, the people of Greenland strongly opposed such an idea due to their relative autonomy.

From the point of view of international law, acquisition or the purchase of lands belonging to another country, requires a comprehensive agreement It is between governments and the satisfaction of the people of that land. Such an action without the consent of the parties will constitute a violation of international laws and the UN Charter.

Trump’s statements in this matter, despite not being practical, had a negative impact on America’s relations with Denmark and other European countries. This issue led to the weakening of the diplomatic image of the United States and increased concern of its allies about Trump’s unpredictable policies.

Trump’s effort to reclaim the Panama Canal

Recently, Donald Trump’s claim about the ownership of the Panama Canal is once again the twisting history of this highway. It has brought the world to the top of the news. Trump’s statements about the recapture of the Panama Canal were among his controversial and impractical positions during the first term of the presidency.

The Panama Canal, which is of particular economic and strategic importance, since 1999 and based on The treaty, which was signed during the presidency of Jimmy Carter, was completely under the control of the Panamanian government.

Trump has proposed the idea of ​​recapturing the channel, possibly seeking to restore an image of the United States’ assertiveness. united But such a claim is not only legally unenforceable, but also a clear violation of Panama’s national sovereignty. The Panama Canal is part of the country’s territory under international laws and official agreements, and any attempt to reclaim it could lead to a serious diplomatic crisis.

From a cost perspective, recapturing the Panama Canal would mean creating a military or diplomatic conflict with Panama and its allies, which could seriously weaken US relations with Latin American countries. . Also, such action will provoke global public opinion and political isolation of the United States.

In addition, these statements could give China more opportunity to strengthen its influence in region In recent years, China has made extensive investments in Latin American infrastructure, including the Panama Canal, and efforts to recapture this canal may increase Beijing’s influence in the region.

As ​​a result, from the eyes of observers, Trump’s statements about recapturing the Panama Canal are purely propaganda and nationalistic, and are impossible and costly in practice. This idea has been proposed more to stimulate public sentiment than as a practical program in foreign policy.

The annexation of the northern neighbor as the fiftieth state of America

Trump recently posted on his social network that “Truth Social“, said Canada can be Fifty Vicinity Become an American state. Referring to the payment of more than 100 million dollars in annual subsidies to Canada, he considered this action meaningless and added: “Many Canadians want Canada to become the 51st state of America. By doing this, they will save on taxes and military protection. I think this is a great idea. State 51!!!”

Trump’s statements about the annexation of Canada to the United States are another of his controversial positions, which are mostly symbolic and propaganda. Referring to this idea, Trump is apparently seeking to show the power of the United States and incite nationalist sentiments, but these statements are completely unrealistic and unworkable in practice.

Canada is one of America’s close allies and has an independent political system and a unique national culture. Any attempt to annex Canada to the United States would be a clear violation of this country’s national sovereignty and contrary to international laws. Such an action is faced with strong resistance from the Canadian government, the support of this country’s global allies, and even the widespread protest of the Canadian people .

From the point of view of economic relations, Canada is the second largest trading partner of the United States, and any tension in bilateral relations can have a negative impact on the economy of both countries. In addition, the close political and military alliance between the two countries, such as cooperation in NATO and border security, has been maintained through friendly and mutually beneficial relations, and such statements could undermine this alliance.

Domestically, too, proposing such an idea in the United States could face a negative reaction. . Many Americans are unwilling to bear the economic and political costs of annexing a new country. Especially a country that has a different welfare and social system.

Therefore, Trump’s comments about Canada’s annexation are not only impractical, but also have negative consequences for bilateral relations and the global standing of the United States. These statements are mostly used as a propaganda tool to attract attention and stimulate nationalist feelings.

The controversial idea of ​​annexing the southern neighbor to America

As ​​mentioned at the beginning of the article, Trump has proposed Mexico to the American states. to join He proposed this controversial idea for economic and security reasons and claims that this action can help improve border conditions and fight against drug cartels.

Trump’s statements about the possibility of Mexico’s accession to the United States were one of his most controversial positions, mostly propaganda and inciting nationalist sentiments. Mexico, as an independent country with a unique history and culture, has sovereignty recognized in international law and any attempt to annex it is considered a clear violation of international law and the UN Charter. This action will be met with the strong resistance of the Mexican government, the support of its global allies, and widespread public protests.

From the point of view of economic relations, Mexico is one of the largest trading partners of the United States, and any serious tension could have severe negative effects on trade between the two countries and the economic stability of the region. In addition, creating a conflict or military action against Mexico would have huge military and diplomatic costs for the United States and could seriously weaken American relations with Latin American countries.

Such statements also weaken America’s diplomatic standing in the world and create opportunities for rivals such as China and Russia to expand their influence in the region. In inside the country, these ideas also face strong opposition from the Congress, public opinion, and legal institutions will be Therefore, Trump’s statements about the annexation of Mexico can be analyzed more as a tool to attract attention and strengthen his political base instead of a realistic plan.

The possibility of realizing Trump’s imperialist dream and its consequences

It seems that Trump’s claims about taking over Greenland, reclaiming the Panama Canal, annexing Canada or Mexico are more symbolic and propaganda than Reality executive. The implementation of these ideas is very difficult due to legal, political, and economic obstacles and can bring huge costs to the United States.

Greenland as part of the territory of Denmark, according to the International and the UN Charter cannot be sold or acquired without the consent of Denmark and the local people. This proposal, in addition to the strong opposition of the Danish government, has also resulted in the negative reaction of American allies.

In the case of the Panama Canal, this area based on agreements international is under the rule of Panama since 1999. Any attempt to recapture this canal means violating Panama’s sovereign rights and inciting global public opinion, which could lead to the diplomatic isolation of the United States. Also, the annexation of Canada or Mexico will bring enormous political and military costs to the United States.

In general, these actions, in addition to violating international laws, provoke global public opinion. , diplomatic isolation and damage to US trade relations with neighboring countries. Also, such statements weaken America’s image in the world.

In inside the country these views, which reflect Trump’s expansionist tendencies, are widely opposed by the institutions Legal and public opinion will face. In addition, these statements are more than a realistic plan for foreign policy, they have been raised to attract attention and stimulate nationalist feelings.