Read the date correctly; Zarif’s speech, the response of the Russian Embassy and the reality of the story

Mehr News Agency , International Group : In regulating Iran’s foreign relations with local, regional and between there is only one “red line” and “protecting the country’s national interests and security” in the chaotic foreign environment. . Book The basis of the Islamic Republic of Iran based on the “neither eastern nor western” principle emphasis has tried to pursue a “balanced foreign policy and a balanced foreign policy.” Realistic “is not in any of the global power blocks, while defining relations with each actress between international seeking to maximize national interests and reduce threats against security and territorial integrity Span> Country. However, Iran has always been the focus of global powers, especially the United States, Britain and Russia because of its location in the heart of the “Span> Hartland Span> as a communication intersection and the center of hydrocarbon resources. In this equation, the aforementioned countries sometimes held the “Tehran Conference” in the form of the Allies without the permission of the Iranian government, and sometimes their competition has become so expanded that it has become a kind of zero equation! Recently, Mohammad Javad Zarif’s remarks at the annual conference of the Iranian Political Science Association on the end of the long -term unity and coalitions have led to an example of Russian defense cooperation to the United States in Europe. By adopting an accelerated textual approach to the Vice President of Strategic Affairs, he implicitly accuses him of “lying” and “unknowingly”. but What is the reality of the story?

What is the truth?

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the two “Westernists” and shortly thereafter “Neavorasianists” took the helm of the Kremlin Palace . Between the ages of 1 and 2, the new Russian rulers have repeatedly tried to be accepted as part of Western civilization and even the continent of Europe to benefit from its economic, technology, political and security. However, the United States led by George W. Bush’s son and later Barack Obama decided to bring new Russia alongside China, Iran and North Korea as the countries Span> > Identify and nominate them in US national security documents as a threat to Washington and Western countries. The emergence of colored revolutions in Ukraine (Orange Revolution- 1), Georgia (Rose-1) and in the coming years to penetrate Armenia to remove Yerevan from Moscow reflects a West plan to approach the borders of the “CIS” and the siege of the new Russia. . Russian military intervention in Georgia and Ukraine can be seen as a sign of the Russians’ reaction to the approach of NATO military facilities near the historical Russian borders.

In the year 9, the Bush administration, with the help of the Israeli “security” project, tried to threaten Iran’s missile capability against nine countries in the West Asian region, but a direct threat to Berlin, Rome, Paris and even London. Slow. beyond This psychological operation but was something else. The Americans intended to approach the Russian borders by using the “collapse of the Berlin Wall” and deploy their so-called offshore-defensive weapons in the eastern continent of Europe. In year 4, Americans began negotiations with the Czech Republic, Poland and Hungary to establish anti -intellectual systems. A few months later, Vladimir Putin called on Washington a security initiative to define this missile defense system against Iran, jointly between the US, Europe and Russia. The accuracy of this narrative can be confirmed by the study of White House documents . The subtle and “span> point ‘s narrative is that the Russians did not really intend to cooperate with the United States against Iran but in it” Westernization “was forced to accompany the narrative ” anti -Iranian to prevent the establishment of antimattering systems near their borders. In other words, Russia had no choice but to provide a temporary and appearance with NATO to prevent the US use of the Wave of Iran Farry in the West to prevent the US use of the Wave of “Farusion” in the West. . This issue was permanently marginalized after the US declared.

but about Narrative Former Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and why it is published in the current situation. Is there a lot of questions and ambiguities now? Regardless of the internal differences about the legality or lack of a delicate presence as the fourteenth government’s strategic affairs adviser, it seems that the principle of his talk at the annual conference of the Iranian Political Science Association was not essentially “anti -Russian” but on the contrary. Practicalism and the true look of have been addressed to the national interests of these conversations. The former Foreign Minister Iran has, on various opportunities, defended the need to expand relations with Russia and China as part of Iran’s balanced foreign policy. However, he should be more careful in expressing some of the ‘s statements about Iran’s bilateral issues with Russia, especially after the illegal and suspicious release of their audio file from the anti -Iranian International Network. Not allow for the use of profitable and malevolent people. On the other hand, the Russian Embassy in Iran must also recognize its and to complain or even complain about the diplomatic laws and custom on the host country’s agents. Repeating this error will definitely face the appropriate reaction from Tehran .

Last Tip

Relations between Tehran-Moscow, despite today’s historical ups and downs, are at the peak of strategic coordination and cooperation. The signing of a comprehensive strategic agreement between Iran and Russia during Massoud Medical visit to Russia can be seen as the beginning of the new season in the relations of these two powers. In the new era, the Russians need to know that the Iranian government is of great value to development cooperation with its northern neighbor but interference in Iranian internal affairs or insulting former agents Span> or the current system is a crossing of the “red line” that can break the wall of trust between the two countries and become “cynicism” and “mistrust”.