Palestine the greatest victim of American vanity commitment; From Camp David to “Century Deal”
= “Saba-backlink” href = “https://www.mehrnews.com”> Mehr News Agency , International Group: In this few weeks of Donald Trump’s reliance on The US presidency is going on, the market of debate about possible Tehran-Washington talks is hot; Negotiations that have previously began indirectly and led to a “comprehensive agreement of the Joint Action” (Brajam), but Trump out of its first presidency, despite Iran’s constructive cooperation. Imposed on Tehran in the form of “maximum pressure”.
In this connection, the Supreme Leader of the Revolution on Friday morning (February 7th) with the Army Air Force commanders and staff, use the “two-year negotiating and negotiation experience. They considered the concession and the shortage but the failure to do so “and added:” The United States violated the same treaty despite its deficiencies. ” Therefore, negotiating with such a non -firm state is, inappropriate and unmistakable, and should not be negotiated with it.
In addition to the brigade, with a historical look at US commitments and treaties with other countries around the world, it can be found to be useless and even harmful to these conversations that multiple treaties have been violated and violated. Undoubtedly America with Palestine is an example of those cases.
repeated covenants and contradictory US policies against Palestine P>
Palestine issue is one of the most complex international crises in which the United States has played an important role. For decades, the United States has repeatedly acted in the form of mediation, the presentation of peace plans and the support of negotiations between the Zionist and Palestinian regime. However, history shows that Washington has repeatedly violated its obligations and has acted by unilateral policies in the interests of the Zionist regime and to the detriment of the Palestinian side.
As the recent Zionist crimes in Gaza have been carried out under the US, the world has witnessed US support for this fake regime’s aggression in recent decades. The United States has been one of the most important supporters of the regime in the military, economic and diplomatic fields since its establishment in the Zionist regime in year 6, which has practically changed the balance of power in favor of Tel Aviv. At the same time, the United States has claimed to act as an impartial mediator to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, but Washington’s policies in violating its obligations have always proved contrary to the claim.
a) US covenant for Camp David 2 and the Palestinian issue Span>
Camp David’s agreement was one of the most important international agreements on the Arab and Zionist conflict between Egypt and this regime with US mediation. The agreement, signed during the presidency of Jimmy Carter, was signed between Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Zionist Prime Minister Menaham Baggin, one of the main parts: one about the peace between Egypt and the Israeli regime and the other on the Palestinian issue. Although the first part led to Egypt’s peace and the Zionist regime, the second part, which was related to the Palestinian rights, was never implemented due to the violation of Tel Aviv and Washington.
, according to the agreement, Palestinians were to be awarded autonomousness and negotiations to determine the final status of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip in the next five years. However, the Zionist regime quickly violated these obligations and made it impossible to implement this part of the agreement by continuing to settle and apply occupation policies. The United States, contrary to its promises, did not put any pressure on the Zionist regime to enforce the terms of the agreement. In fact, after the Egyptian peace and the Israeli regime, Washington no longer had the incentive to promote the Palestinian rights, and practically ignored it.
This American covenant led the Palestinians, especially the Palestinian Liberation Organization (SAF), to conclude that Washington is not a neutral mediator. As a result, this experience became one of the factors that increased Palestinian distrust of US -backed negotiations. The failure of the Palestinian sector Camp David’s agreement showed that without real pressure on the Zionist regime, a fair solution to the Palestinian issue cannot be achieved.
In addition to the US aid to the Zionist regime in the destruction of Gaza and the testimony of more than 6,000 Palestinians, new US President Donald Trump’s proposal to expel Palestinians from Gaza to Egypt and Jordan can be assessed by the Americans in the same violation of Camp David’s treaty.
B) Oslo (1) and American Testimony
Oslo’s agreement signed between the Palestinian Liberation Organization (SAF) and the Zionist regime under US supervision was due to form an independent Palestinian state at the border. According to the agreement, the United States had pledged to support its implementation. But in practice, Washington did not prevent the expansion of Zionist settlements, while pledging to facilitate the peace process.
The US also restricted funding to the Palestinian Authority, while supporting the economic development of Palestinian areas. In addition to the above, the United States was silent against the violations of the Zionist regime, including the assassination of Palestinian leaders and repeated violations of security agreements.
c) Plan “Peace Road” (1) and US disregard
in year 2, the United States, along with a quadruple group (including the United States, the European Union, Russia and the United Nations), presented the “Peace Roadmap” plan, which aims It was a solution to the two states. But the United States did not fulfill its obligations and allowed the Zionist regime to increase settlements, which practically eliminated the solution of two states.
In addition, the United States imposed severe sanctions on the Palestinian government, especially after Hamas’s victory in the election, while supporting the democratic process. Also, instead of impartial mediation, he stood alongside the Zionist regime and, with the restless support of Tel Aviv, pushed the peace process.
d) Exit International Agreements in Trump P>
Donald Trump’s administration in the first round of his presidency made one of the most explicit examples of US covenant. The most important items are:
1. Transfer of the US Embassy to Jerusalem (1): This was contrary to UN resolutions and showed that the United States no longer adheres to a two -state solution.
۲ . Disconnecting Palestinian Rescue Agency (Aneva): This action put a severe economic pressure on the Palestinian people.
1. The “Century Trading” and the Elimination of Palestinian Rights: The so -called century trading project, which was presented in Year 2, practically deprived Palestinians of the right to form an independent state.
۱ . Palestinian forced migration: Trump in the first weeks of his second presidency also offered Palestinian forced migration from Gaza to Jordan and Egypt; A suggestion that, though faced with a strong reaction from the world and is more like a rhetoric than a matter of applicable, suggests the continuation of American covenants.
The consequences of American covenant; From Disorders to White House promises to strengthen resistance
US covenant consequences for Palestine can be examined in several main axes; Washington’s repeated violations have led the Palestinians, and even some Arab countries, to accept the United States as an impartial mediator. This has led many countries to seek alternative solutions, such as China and Russia’s efforts to enter the peace process.
, on the other hand, contradictory American policies have strengthened Palestinian resistance groups such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad, because the Palestinian people no longer have hope for negotiations. As a result, armed clashes have increased and the security situation in the region has become more elaborate, including Hamas’s storm operations and the dipping of the West and the Zionist regime in a major tension and clashes.
Also, one of the direct results of this covenant was the weakening of the position of the Palestinian Authority led by Mahmoud Abbas. The organization, which emphasized the peace talks, has lost its credibility among the Palestinian people because of the failure to fulfill US promises.
Overall, the history of American-Palestinian relations shows that Washington has repeatedly violated its obligations and in practice, instead of playing the role of an impartial mediator, openly the interests of the Zionist regime. It has provided, and this approach has led to an increase in instability in the region. In the current situation, the only way to create sustainable peace is to end US dual policies and adopt a realistic and just approach to the Palestinian issue; A reality that seems out of mind, given Trump’s fondness of forced migration of Gaza people,
