Europe’s heavy cost in trust in America
“Saba-backlink” href = “https://www.mehrnews.com”> Mehr News Agency , International Group: Post-World War II to date European countries America behaved in the international arena, and there is no independent Europe in the minds of many scholars in international relations. Investigating Europe’s behavior with the Islamic Republic of Iran, how European countries face Russia and China, their issues in the Middle East, and so on have been on the circuit of White House policies.
Brussels’ trust in the White House went so far as European countries tied their “security” and “basic energy economy” to America. So the European Union alone is not able to secure itself, especially in the hardware sector. European regional security is heavily dependent on US military capability. Therefore, reviewing trends in the field of international relations shows that negotiations to create security and trust in others will mean failure for that country or region.
In fact, if a country was able to gain its security through negotiation, it will forever be negotiating security, which means lack of security. It is the country and if it fails to succeed in the process of negotiation, it will become insecure. Europe, with the US agreement, accepted NATO to secure its security. The act that has made European security in the current situation has created a security puzzle for European countries until French President Emmanuel Macron speaks of the necessity of an independent army in Europe, and Ukrainian President Zelnski calls for calling for Forming the European armed forces.
The importance of the subject is as much as the European that defined itself in terms of ideology, economically, political, and so on. America has become. The fact is that Europe has nothing to say without American support and does not have sufficient prerequisites to announce an independent role as an influential and decision -maker in the international arena.
US President Trump, contrary to Europe’s perception, intends to negotiate with Russia on the issue of Ukraine, so that according to some propositions, not only European countries Rather, Kibyv will not be present at the negotiating table, and it is America that will decide on its own interests about the future of Ukraine. A spokesman for the EU foreign policy chief Kaya Kalas said that the Foreign Ministers will hold an emergency meeting on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference to review recent US officials’ positions on Ukraine.
The meeting is held as US President Donald Trump’s Special Representative for Ukrainian affairs has emphasized that Europe in the future peace talks between the United States, Russia and Ukraine There will be no presence. Disagreements between Europe and the United States over the role of the European Union in the process of talks intensified, when Kate Cloogh said on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference that Europe should provide specific solutions instead of protest.
These differences led the EU foreign ministers to meet immediately. According to the European Commission spokesman, the meeting is “assessing the new US policy and the path ahead.” It is important to note that Europe has always treated Russia on the basis of US policies during the Ukrainian war for the past three years, abandoning its interests with Russia and the process of hostility to Moscow on the basis of Moscow. The White House standards followed. The subject that showed today is Europe’s main loser.
So the most fundamental thing in this is Europe to have unacceptable failure in the US and the other time of Europe’s use in the Ukrainian war for the United States Has been.
Now this situation should be a lesson for other countries who tend to achieve economic and security development through negotiations with the West (US). Today, Europe is paying a heavy price for the United States while the continent is politically closest to American policies.
, therefore, the current European situation shows that many countries interact with different countries before they want to interact with the international arena; In their domestic policies, he must first seek “localization of security” and “basic economy” and then seek negotiations to find different paths to raise their security and economic factor. In the meantime, Iraq, Libya, etc. can be exemplified that they have never achieved the desired result and today are severely deficient in lack of security and more trusted the West; They had as much security puzzle. In negotiations with countries, the United States only thinks about its interests to weaken countries and will never and will never seek to conquer countries.
Akbar Masoumi PhD student in International Relations
