Confrontation with Friends and Enemies; New US Foreign Policy Season with Trump
“Saba-backlink” href = “https://www.mehrnews.com”> Mehr News Agency , International Group : : New US President Donald Trump has stepped in the White House for the second time, this time he is not an inexperienced person as before. The Republican was besieged and had to coordinate their views with them. “Loyalty” is the most important feature of the new members of the Trump cabinet who work in various posts.
Trump talks about the desire to join Greenland, the Panama Canal occupation, the tariff war with Europe, and the suspension of Ukraine’s help, some thought that Washington was merely a ratio. It has a “offensive” policy for its enemies and rivals. In other words, in recent years, the United States has always tried to show a reliable image for its friends to develop its influence around the world.
Now the Yankee’s greed has raised the question for foreign policy experts what can be the achievement of Tehran? In the following, we will continue to try to find a closer look at its offensive measures to regulate foreign relations with different countries while examining the Trump administration’s foreign policy.
arrogance; The root of the root in the essence of America
Over the past three centuries, America as the “promised land” of European immigrants has always tried to put their policies on a kind of “exception” and “expansionism” colonialism Set up to become the most powerful and richest country in the world. Along the way, they showed that not only will the enemies of America in the worst possible, but they will go to their allies in historical sites and force them to revise policies or change behavior based on American interests. . In other words, we are confronted with a “arrogant state” that has no red line to achieve its desires.
Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution emphasized in one of their recent speeches: “The Americans did not act; The same person who is now at work ruled this treaty; He said I was tearing and Kurdish; They didn’t act. Before he came, the same treaties with which the treaty did not act on the treaty; The treaty was to lift US sanctions, but US sanctions were not lifted. In the case of the United Nations, they also wounded a bone that would always exist on Iran’s head like a threat. This treaty is a product of a negotiation that I think took two years or more or less. Well this is the other experience; Use this experience. Should not negotiate with such a state; Negotiating is not wise, not clever, not honorable. ”
Reference of the Trump administration’s foreign policy
Unlike the Biden government, the Trump administration’s foreign policy philosophy is more than focused on attending various international and regional disputes, using different tools using different tools Focused. Among the four main schools in American foreign policy (Wilsonism, Hamiltonism, Jeffersonism, and Jacksonism), most of the people in Trump’s second government appear to be Jackson’s school.
people in this school more focused on maximizing American interests rather than looking for Wilson’s adventures to export democracy and change world order by using American interests Tools such as diplomacy, war, sanctions, consensus, and so on are tools. Such a view allows Washington to renew its relations with its friends, competitors and enemies again and enter into various cases with a profitable approach. Perhaps this is why Trump has repeatedly stated that it will end the Ukrainian war and will resume a tariff with China, Mexico and Canada!
on the path to supporting American producers and changing Washington’s trade balance with different countries, friends and enemies. The second strategic and important look at Trump’s foreign policy apparatus can be seen as an attempt to revive Monroe’s doctrine. In December, then -President James Monroe warned European powers by publishing their dual principles that they should not interfere in the affairs of the newly independent republics in the Western Hemisphere. Trump’s talk these days about Greenland, Canada, Panama, Mexico and the Leftists in Latin America reflect this view of this view in the US foreign policy apparatus.
Burton Woods’s order destruction based on colonial era P>
The Americans intend to return to the “Old Colonial” era to revive their position in the international system and use tools such as “forced diplomacy”, “economic sanctions” and “economic sanctions” and Even “military power” dictates their views on the various countries and blocks of power around the world. In the new world of Canada it is one of the US states, and the Panama Channel is part of Washington’s assets in the American continent. Grindlend must be controlled by the US because of the privileged geopolitical position, and there is nothing called the Mexican Gulf within the “American Empire”. Confrontation of this threat requires a defensive foreign policy that can minimize the threats from the new US government and minimize the damage caused by Trump’s colonial policy.
Talk interest
Despite the analysts’ efforts to put the Trump administration’s foreign policy in one of the four basic schools: Hamiltonism, Wilsonism, Jeffersonism, and Jacksonism, but it seems to be finally. Let’s talk about a new school in American foreign policy, which can be referred to as “Trumpism”. In this new school, there are signs of Jeffersoni’s policy and attention to the “national interests” of America; As a matter of course, the policy of Neo Monroe is seen to revive American domination in the West Hemisphere, especially America’s neighbors.
While Trump speaks of the end of endless wars and the return of American soldiers home, the traits of people like Marco Rubio and Tim Walz cause the danger of returning the shadow of the war Do not minimize the Middle East. The more aggressive US foreign policy to eliminate China, the desire to revive neo -Turkishism and the attraction of foreign investors, all shows that Americans have adopted a confrontation with a friend and foe.
