Consequences of Zionist occupation at five border points in southern Lebanon
reports Mehr News Agency quoted by Lebanese newspaper Al -Akhbar, the withdrawal of the Zionist regime from the Lebanese border areas, came in a situation where the ambitious targets that the regime had raised during the war decreased due to resistance.
Why Zionists have to retreat from Lebanon
it is clear that the occupation regime’s decision to withdraw from Lebanon was due to the Zionists’ fear of resistance and the occupiers concluded that their continued presence in southern Lebanon It may lead Hezbollah to resume operations against Israel.
here we should point out that the Zionist regime failed in its main and direct goal of the war against Lebanon, the destruction or weakening of it, and also failed to resist resistance from the equation. Remove Lebanon’s internal political politics. The Zionist regime’s bets on the collapse of resistance defense lines in southern Lebanon also failed; Where the Zionists during the war saw the mythical consistency of the resistance warriors in the ground battle.
But after the ceasefire agreement between Lebanon and the Zionist regime in the past three months, there is a possibility of the future of the border areas between Lebanon and occupied Palestine. Come: Either the formation of the Zionist army’s security belt in southern Lebanon, which some commanders and experts were talking about or the retreat of the occupation army forces Lebanese borders recognized by international resolutions.
Finally, the occupiers were forced to withdraw from Lebanon, thus defeating the Zionist Army Security Belt project in Lebanon and the Zionists staying in four strategic points. Highly replaced the security belt in Lebanon; The issue that has been met with opposition from many Zionist circles that they believe that the temporary stay of Israeli forces in several strategic locations in Lebanon cannot replace the security belt project.
Zionist occupation agents and consequences in Lebanese border hills P>
But the main question created after the occupation regime’s army withdrawal from Lebanon is why the Zionists stayed at four strategic points in Lebanon and what are the importance of these points. The places where the Zionist occupiers still remain, including high hills overlooking southern Lebanon as well as a large number of occupied northern Palestine settlements. These include the hills of al -Hammas, al -Avazeh hills, the Jebel Balat hills, al -Albouh hills and al -Azieh hills.
The regime’s army justifies staying in these hills so that Israeli forces can monitor the movements that take place in southern Lebanon and northern Israel (occupied Palestine). To prevent repeating the al -Aqsa storm on the northern front. Therefore, the establishment of Israeli forces in the hills of Lebanon has a military and security advantage.
Together, occupying these hills is part of the Zionist regime’s pressure cards to achieve the goals that Tel Aviv failed to achieve during the war. Also, given the continuing invasion of the occupiers against Lebanon after a ceasefire, it is not possible to end the regime’s aggression following the Israeli army withdrawal from Lebanon.
On the other hand, the estimates of some Hebrew circles are that Israel’s stay on these hills is a big mistake that Tel Aviv later paid for. Some Zionist military commanders and experts say Hezbollah may resort to targeting Israeli forces in the hills of Lebanon; In particular, Israeli forces in Lebanon are now considered the occupation and attacking them is a legitimate option.
These Zionist circles emphasize that if the Israeli army wants to provide security for settlers in the northern settlements, it can deploy Uniffel forces in Lebanese border areas. /p>
But in the end, if the Lebanese government thinks right and has the courage to make independent decision-making against international supporters of the Zionist regime, it still has cards that still have cards that still It can use them. Lebanese officials are currently focused on diplomatic cards as a replacement for military resistance; But this option can be effective if the Lebanese government has pressure leverage and power elements.
It is clear that over the past decades, only military resistance has led to the Zionist occupation of southern Lebanon and no other option has been successful, so The Lebanese government is obliged to take action appropriate to Lebanon’s national interests instead of listening to US orders.
