Hamas response to the New York Times media mischief about resistance weapons
report to Mehr News Agency quoted by Sama News Agency Palestine, Hamas Islamic Resistance Movement issued a statement in response to statements attributed to Musa Abu Razogh that media statements about these remarks are not true.
Mehr News Agency quoted by Sama Palestine News Agency, Hamas Movement issued a statement in response to attributable statements Moussa Abu Razogh announced that media remarks in the interview with the New York Times of the US March 6 (March 6) are inaccurate Is.
Hamas added: “This interview was done a few days ago and ‘s statements, full answers Does not reflect the presented but these statements outside the original text of the interview and contrary to With issues raised.
based on Hamas report, He emphasized that Operation Operation October 5 (Storm of Al -Aqsa) reflects the right of the Palestinian people to resist the occupation And it is siege and the occupiers are responsible for the genocide in Gaza.
Hamas also said that Abu Razuk on the constant positions of the Palestinian movement and right to resist until destruction The occupiers emphasized and added that the Palestinian people’s right to use various forms of resistance, especially armed resistance, adheres.
The group added: Abu Razuq also emphasized that the weapon of resistance is the right of the Palestinian people and aims to support the Palestinian nation and its sacred and retreat until the occupation against land Palestinian will not be possible.
Hazem Qasim spokesman for the Hamas Movement , statements attributed to Musa reject Abu Razzuk Span> and emphasize the legitimacy and undisputed weapon of resistance weapon Kurdish.
He stated that Hamas adheres to the weapon of resistance as a legitimate tool and will not be negotiated until the occupation of the Palestinian territories continues. / P>
Hamas spokesman added: “The words attributed to Abu Razzouk are not the official position of Hamas. P>
Qassim also condemned the destructive and aggressive measures of the occupiers in numerous wars against the nations of the region, especially in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.
Ismail Rezwan other Hamas leaders also emphasize that weapons are red line resistance that can be Is not negotiation, accused the occupiers of trying to escape the implementation of the ceasefire agreement.
He asked the mediators to put pressure on the occupiers to fully implement the agreement.
New York Times quoted Abu Razogh claim that Hamas had no previous information on the October 5 attack plan.
This US media has claimed that Abu Razogh had told it: If I knew that October 5 would have such a widespread destruction, I would have prevented it.
based on the New York Times ‘claim, ‘ Abu Razuk Moss was unaware of the details of the plan, but agreed with the general strategy of attacking Israel.
In addition, the New York Times quoted Abu Razogh as saying that Hamas is ready to negotiate his weapon future.
