Ocalan’s call to disarm the PKK is due to new regional developments
Ocalan stated in his statement that there is no other way than democracy and democratic dialogue and the republic’s survival is not possible except through brotherly democracy.
in the same vein Section Turkish Istanbul News Agency The interview “ Mustafa Yilmaz The author of the Turkish National Newspaper has performed:
Finally, after years of conflict between the PKK and Turkey, at the request of the Baghchali government and some negotiations, Abdullah Ojan gave the call to dissolve. A few years ago, the late Turkish journalist Mahmat Ali Brand had interviewed Ocalan, who showed Ocalan’s talk, which was determined to continue the PKK route, what factors and fields now have made Ocalan a call for the dissolution of the PKK?
Abdullah Ocalan’s call for the land and his invitation to its dissolution is an important and positive transformation in Turkey’s history, because Turkey is one of the great victims of terrorism. It is obvious that it is not possible to achieve the result through a weapon, and this has both material and spiritual damage to Türkiye and the Turkish nation. In this regard, it is important to call for the ground by the founder and leader of the PKK. I believe that the main factors that led the PKK leader to call for weapons have been the change of new political balances and developments in the region.
The question that arises here is whether a single structure can be called a single structure when talking to the PKK? This question must first be answered, because it is an obvious fact that the PKK has been used in the region for a long time as a proxy element of international forces, especially the US and European countries.
What will be the trend. It seems that the members of the PKK have not yet believed in Ocalan’s message and have announced that Ocalan should send a video message. Do you think PKK will listen to Ocalan?
When talking to the PKK, it is not actually a single structure, but one can speak of an illegal economy that has been formed over the years. In addition, a very serious Diaspora (exiled and immigrant) in European countries such as Germany, France and Britain.
At this point, is it enough to abandon the weapon by the candle-based forces alone? How will other branches of this organization in Europe, especially in the UK and France, will respond to this? I believe that to understand this issue we have to wait for the process.
Please explain the type of view of different Turkish parties to the recent developments on Ocalan?
undoubtedly assessed an important part of the community in Türkiye as positively assessed the call and dissolution of the PKK. There are, of course, some protests by nationalist circles, but previous statements by the Turkish National Movement Party (MHP) and Mr Baghchali have minimized the reaction to such a change. This is actually an important opportunity for Türkiye.
One of the main concerns is that Qandil and PKK are considered the only representative of the Kurdish problem. Because this may have problems. Because it is clear that in Türkiye the Democratic People’s Party (DEM) is not the only representative of the Kurds. Therefore, adopting an approach in which all sectors of society, including the families of the martyrs, participate in this process and that the process of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, can have a greater contribution to the problem.
