Assassination instructions; With what trick does Washington eliminate anti -American leaders?

href = “https://www.mehrnews.com”> Mehr News Agency , International Group : Hazem Study Center has published a report on the US Central Central Intelligence Service on the evaluation of the US government on confidential and important assassinations of the country and some other countries. The document came on the WikiLeaks website and has translated and published it into Arabic. The document examines the positive and negative results of the US government assassination policy by the country’s espionage services against the leaders of their opposition and the impact of these actions as well as the summary of the US intelligence and intelligence teams. The document also examined the assassinations against the leaders of the groups named “rebel” groups in Afghanistan, Algeria, Iraq, occupied Palestine, Northern Ireland, Sri Libya and Libya and Peru.

This document, which describes itself as the world’s strongest government, is trying to make its maximum goals at the lowest cost.

Read more : Booklet; What are Washington’s strategic basics for eliminating anti -American currents?

Negative strategic effects of anti-American top elements

negative strategic consequences of US government assassinations include:

Increasing the support of rebel groups ( In this report, protest against the United States or its allies inside and outside the country)

government negligence over other strategies against rebel streams.

Religious Strategic Change and re-organize them to reinforce their own.

Strengthening the connection between natives of countries and armed groups.

residual tendency of armed groups towards extremism.

Creating a vacuum that may lead to more extreme currents.

Increased conflicts in the interests of rebel groups.

This report emphasizes that the US government should consider the following in line with its best planning and operation:

Determination of the desired results

assassination operations of senior elements of opposition groups can have unpredictable effects, so these assassinations are more successful when their goals are clearer and its effects on US opposition groups.

decision-making based on the internal mechanisms of anti-American groups

Government decision-making in the assassination operation is primarily based on a deep understanding of the internal mechanisms of insurgent groups and their weaknesses, which are usually possible through information infiltration within these groups or the use of information separated from them.

Mergeing assassination operations with other methods

Governments can pursue their senior elements assassination programs with a pervasive anti-insurgent strategy to modify strategy elements to use or compensate for assassination.

Supporting possible elements under US protected

The assassination operation should be unique to those who have the highest volume of opposition to US policies, but the operation may ultimately increase the likelihood of political reconciliation, many of the riots may face internal divisions between the military or the people.

use the internal gap of group leaders

expanding or exploiting internal gaps in command command such as welcoming individuals and their adverse leaders can have the same effect as the assassination of leaders of these groups through military operations.

Senior elements assassination operations as influential in removing opponents

Military and political leaders of governments in the fight against armed groups usually use the policy of assassination or elimination of senior elements of these groups to achieve the following goals, these are the goals that US intelligence services are pursuing their own assassination. Group activities in the future based on the consequences of these assassinations, weakening the morale of group elements, punishing group leaders for past acts.

In this report, assassinations in Afghanistan (1 to 2) Algeria (1-8) Colombia (1-2) Iraq (1 to 2) Ensoria (1 to 2 and 2-5) Pro) Northern Ireland (1 to 2) Sri Lanka (1 to 2) has been reviewed, with examples of Chechnya, Libya, Pakistan and Thailand.

Positive strategic effects

This document refers to strategic positive effects as a result of attacks and assassinations around the world and outline these works. Americans have named opponents of their policies around the world in this document with the term insurgent elements:

reducing the influence of armed elements.

weakening the will of the rebel elements.

Reduce the level of support provided to these elements.

creating divisions and parsing in rebel groups.

changing strategy or organizing opponents to secure American interests.

Strengthening the US Government and supporting this country.

These assassinations can increase conflicts between these groups and the agent governments that can benefit or disadvantage governments.

The impact of assassinations on American opposition groups

first: Reduce the impact of these groups:

doing these assassinations can cause these groups to shake the power of these groups so that these groups cannot handle the consequences of these actions. On the other hand, such assassinations can also increase group leaders’ plans in their security measures, which reduces their impact.

in Colombia attacks against the leaders of rebel groups early in the year, which had been carried out after extensive attacks on their second and third leaders, reduced the power of the Colombian revolutionary currents (Fork). This information has been taken from the Colombian Central Central Police and the US Embassy Report in Bogota.

in Iraq, the Mohammedan Army also failed in the late year after the leader of the movement and its successors were captured by British. The report was reflected by the Jordan Intelligence Service.

Also, existing reports of al-Qaeda’s detainees show that Osama bin Laden’s efforts to fail, including failure to use advanced technological supplies or communicate with others, and their indirect leadership, reduced his power in al-Qaeda’s command.

Second: Weakening the International’s will

loss of leaders of these groups can reduce their morale at all levels and increase the risk of entry into various actions and riots, especially when there is no clear design in these groups for the individual’s succession.

The killing of Raul Raul, a member of the Colombian Revolutionary Revolutionary Forces Secretary, may have eliminated the discipline and organizational spirit of these groups in acute form. This is stated in the report of the US intelligence services. Also a week later, Ivan Rios, another secretary -general element, was killed by his personal bodyguard, and many of the movement’s theorists surrendered in year 6.

claiming to be an expert in the US government, in the midst of Hamas, after the martyrdom of Sheikh Ahmad Yassin and Abdulaziz al-Ratiisi, the morale of these groups decreased.

Third: Disruption of Group Support

Death of US opposition leaders or arrests can affect native or foreign support for these groups, as supporters of these groups may reconsider their chances of success or in the possible cost of supporting these groups.

This happened in the year after the killing of four separatist insurgents in Thailand and created a wide gap between the group and reduced indigenous support for them. This is the issue in the US Embassy report in Bangkok.

, of course, the assassination of senior group leaders may reinforce support for these groups, especially when the assassination emphasizes the ideas of the leaders of these groups, or in these attacks, civilian or legal elements of these groups. Give.

, for example, the Zionist regime’s efforts in the year 1 to 2 increased solidarity between anti-Zionist groups and increased popular support for their leaders. This is emphasized by the US Embassy’s report in the occupied Quds.

fourth: Disintegencies

eliminating opposition leaders can lead to expanding internal gaps and decomposing these groups. This increases when these groups are made up of coalition organizations.

, for example, the killing of two leaders of the Libyan Islamic groups in the US missile attack in January, created a serious obstacle to the process of integrating these groups with al-Qaeda and increased the gap between the elements of the Libyan Islamic community in North Africa.

targeting senior characters can force armed groups to change their goals or strategy, resulting in its internal restructuring. The report lists assassinations against Sadr’s movement in Iraq or Russian attacks in Chechnya between the ages of 1 and 2.

in year 2, the arrest of a group of senior elements of the Southern Liberation Movement in Thailand also led the senior members of this complex to increase their security and operational measures and take the decentralized command system.

The impact of prominent assassinations on governments

executing the assassinations of senior elements of currents can have positive or negative effects on governments’ efforts to combat these groups. For example, this can increase the spiritual spirit and popular support for the sovereignty, or to focus the government towards the wrong path. Given the convergence of many armed groups with the public context of its struggle, the government may realize that success in these operations can provide an important message to government supporters, stating that the government has taken serious steps in opposition to insurgent groups.

, for example, an American newspaper reported that the central government’s popularity increased from 5 % to 5 % following the killing of Raul, the head of the Revolutionary Armed Forces Secretary-General in Colombia.

influencing elements assassinations on the process of anti-insurgency activities

numerous features of armed groups such as the structure of these groups and government agents such as the level of influence of military and militant tools can be contributing to the process of activity of these groups after the assassination of their leaders:

A: Factors related to armed groups

۱. Interior structure

Groups with a concentrated internal structure are more likely to be harmed as a result of such assassinations, but decentralized armed groups such as Hamas are more compatible with these assassinations and can restore themselves after these assassinations.

The Taliban’s military structure is also a mixture of upward pyramid system and a tribal system based on equality and public opinion that has made this group more power to endure the assassination of its leaders. This issue is considered in US military reports and other confidential reports.

, but a group like Peru’s insurgents based on central power, failed to stand on foot after the capture of his leader, the Jawzman, in the year.

1. Planning for succession and weight of alternatives

Planning armed groups to replace different individuals and the extent of military and political capabilities of alternatives and power to promote the level of intelligence and skills of the leaders of the group are issues that can affect these groups’ sustainability against the assassination of their leaders. As for the Taliban and al -Qaeda, they are likely to be able to offset the vacuum of their leaders, especially at the middle level, and many commanders of these groups are overseeing foreign operations, which reduces the problems caused by the assassination of different personalities in these groups.

۱. The level of presence and recognition of leaders among the people

losing one of the prominent leadership characters in different groups can have deeper psychological consequences than the lack of characters that people are not aware of. Therefore, groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah showing behaviors such as governments’ actions and providing health services to their employees have more public presence, but some secret groups such as al -Qaeda in Iraq are managed in such a way that people are unaware of their presence.

۱. Different steps of groups

armed groups have less power to revive themselves and are more fragile during their formation or decline and final periods, and this is less observed during their puberty.

۱. People’s support

armed elements may have come together on a single subject and have strong relationships with others. Experts from armed groups believe that this causes the loss of leaders to have less impact on the performance of the group, as alternatives can follow the same method. The nature of Hamas and their social service network and the renovation of their context following the testimony of Sheikh Ahmad Yassin and Abdulaziz al -Netti in year 2 made the group restore itself again.

۱. Having a safe bed

existence of foreign or internal secure platforms can be a prominent feature of armed groups. US military and confidential reports had previously claimed that Iran was a safe refugee for elements of the Iraqi leadership that gave them the opportunity to train and equip and improve their training conditions and prevent their elements from captivity. In southern Thailand, the temporary lack of Malaysian support for insurgent groups was an important factor in the loss of military and armed divisions in the area. This is the case by the US Embassy in Bangkok.

b: Government agents:

1. The duration and compression of the operation

The assassination operation of senior elements of armed groups can be long-term and widespread and create serious challenges for the armed elements. But cross -sectoral and non -coordinated attacks may escape the armed elements and not have much operational value and the more important elements will survive.

, for example, the death of Abu Mas’ab al-Zarqawi failed to immediately decline al-Qaeda operations in Iraq, but the impact of the attack on the Sunnis led to al-Sahwa’s group. However, al -Qaeda had worked on the group’s activities a year ago.

۱. Select the assassination method

Governments can use different variables such as cultural variables or the probability of lateral damage to evaluate the desired effects on assassination operations and cause the desired impact through the capture of prominent elements or use of psychological operations for these groups. The arrests of these groups can challenge the legendary state of the leaders of these groups among different groups of people, and interrogations can also have better effects on assassination.

Usually, if the government intends to integrate the groups into political activities, the arrest of command elements can be more effective than assassination, for example the Iraqi government decided to assassinate Muqtada Sadr and many of its advisers, but rather to political computing.

, of course, the capture of leaders can have a less psychological impact, as most elements think that leaders will be released, or that these leaders can maintain their influence at the time of detention. Just like what Nelson Mandela did during captivity in South African apartheid prisons.

The tendency of some armed groups to adapt to efforts made to assassinate leaders has led them to decentralized governance, such as focusing on rebel power resources such as logistics facilities or financial resources that can be more influential than those. For example, if the government wants to bring a group to its structure, the assassination of its leaders will be impossible. This was what happened to Sadr. Under these circumstances, governments are trying to reduce the influence of these groups, prevent them from growing, or cut off their funds or separate a group of its structures from the insurgency network.

reducing the influence of groups can be done by removing influential characters and supporting non-competent characters in these currents or restoring them to key positions or separating characters from potential government resources or supporting human resources.

c: Guidelines for the assassination of senior elements of armed groups

Governments that have succeeded in assassinating senior elements of armed groups emphasize the importance of the operation without ignoring various aspects of anti-insurgent activities. We consider some of the best behaviors that can be considered in the planning or evaluation of terror operations.

1. Specify the desired results

a assassination can produce unpredictable and unpredictable results, for example increased the power of more extremist leaders, so assassinations will succeed when the government can fully evaluate the desired effect of the accident. If the government’s goal is to reach a solution based on negotiation, government officials will try to avoid assassination or to pursue a strategy of reducing influence and will increase their pressure on political approaches.

, according to an expert on insurgency, terrorist operations in the process of anti-insurgency activities can fluctuate between the risk of rioting or moving it to criminal and terrorist activities.

۱. Decisions based on the internal activity mechanisms of armed groups

proper use of assassination operations is to accurately inform the internal mechanisms of these groups and determine their weaknesses, usually by infiltration of information or receiving information from separated elements. Social or ideological differences between leaders and members can also be used as a disadvantage.

۱. Integration of assassination operations with other methods of anti -riot strategy

Some governments combine them with a broader strategy in the context of anti-insurgent activities. The success of governments in carrying out military and civilian missions in this process is a key factor in the role of their strategy in combating these groups. Assassination of prominent elements can complement the process of military activity within a pervasive method.

۱. Support for temperate elements

assassination of prominent elements can increase the opportunities for political reconciliation. Most armed groups have internal divisions among them with military approaches and leaders with political approaches.

, for example, the UK use of the assassination of prominent elements in Ireland increased the tendency of these groups to moderate.

1. Using the internal gap among group leaders

abuse of internal divide among leaders of different groups can have the same effect as the assassination of military leaders in these groups; For example, the Sri Lankan government succeeded in making many gains for itself using the gap between Tamil’s leaders.

samples of the assassination of prominent elements in the world

1 Taliban in Afghanistan

Americans have made extensive efforts to assassinate Taliban leaders in Afghanistan since the year, but the government’s limited influence in areas outside of Kabul prevented these measures from being frustrated, in addition to achieving reconciliation in Afghanistan for some reason, including corruption and corruption in Afghanistan. Faced with many restrictions.

In addition, Taliban elements and leaders used Pakistan as their safe haven to protect American terrorist acts. On the other hand, although the Taliban had a centralized leadership system, it showed a considerable use of it and had a high power to replace the missing elements with capable people, which was mentioned in American confidential and military reports.

۱. Algerian National Liberation Front 1 to 2

Algerian National Liberation Front began its efforts against the French occupation of France in year 6 to form an independent state. The group operated against the French by using its popular context, but the French reaction made the Algerian nation a victim, which increased the popularity of the National Liberation Front.

The French succeeded in arresting the National Liberation Front leader Ahmed bin Bila and four other leaders in the year, but these actions led to radical leaders in the movement. The Rand School reports that the brutal measures taken France to suppress the popular movement led to the expansion of local support for these uprising, and Algeria eventually achieved independence.

۱. Rebel elements in Colombia

Armed Forces in Colombia, called Farak, began their militant activities in year 6. But after Alvaro Oib’s inauguration in the leadership of the movement, they expanded their activities. The Colombian government has been seeking to influence and suppress the movement for many years, and finally, by strengthening its spy services, it carried out a set of successful operations against the group and reduced the morale of the uprising elements.

۱. Al -Qaeda in Iraq

al-Qaeda network in Iraq, called al-Zarqawi Network, was one of the most important targets of American terrorism early in the year. Al -Qaeda lost many local rulers and senior leaders during this period, but this process did not reduce its activities.

US diplomatic and intelligence reports say that the group’s top anti-element attacks along with the formation of al-Qaeda’s anti-al-Qaeda coalition in Iraq eventually have lost its popular context and reduced its activities in Iraq since then.

۱. Hezbollah and Hamas

in the mid-1980s the Zionist regime began widespread repression against armed Islamists, the second intifada being part of it. During this period, Hezbollah, with its decentralized and powerful structure to replace the forces as well as the deep coalition it had with its societies, managed to resist the damage that the Zionist regime caused. This has been emphasized by the set of international crises.