New Zionist regime strategy in Africa to contain Yemen
reports
In this regard, writers and analysts believe that Sanaa’s entry into the Palestinian Resistance Support war in Gaza has had a huge impact on the developments and has put widespread pressure on the Zionist regime, causing the US and Britain to be in trouble because they failed to stop it.
“Danny Strinovic” analyst at the Zionist Academy of Homeland Security believes that Israeli movements and the International Coalition against Yemeni Armed Forces last year failed to balance the movement’s deterrence.
Israelis first counted on the American-English coalition to counter Yemen, but now they have set their strategy independent of these countries and have sought to strengthen the security system that specifically consider the US and technical and technical information development and information. Has been.
In this regard, the Zionist regime has increased its presence in neighboring African governments neighboring Yemen. The move, which appears to be followed by Tel Aviv for Year 2, has made Ethiopia the center of the project. In this regard, the Zionist Foreign Minister’s ancestor met with his Ethiopian counterpart Timoni and examined in a bilateral way that the threats of Ansarullah were described. At the end of the meeting, the two sides announced that “Ansarullah is for Israel, Africa and world order!”
al-Akhbar adds that analysts in Sana’a’s policies hope that Washington will take a different approach from the former US President Joe Biden during the rule of Donald Trump and make major changes in its efforts to eliminate its strength.
Western and Israeli and Gulf experts and writers point out a few important points in examining the current situation in the region:
– Sanaa’s entry into the Gaza support front has resisted Yemen’s essential position on the axis, thus increasing the existence of Ansarullah in Iraq and the Horn of Africa, making it a regional power that has been inspired by the Arab countries and Islamic countries.
– Ansarullah is at the forefront of the resistance axis, thus requireing its conditions to help resist in the Gaza Strip, thus enter into a direct war with Israel.
– A look at the speed of decision-making of Yemeni leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi in the resumption of Israeli ships shows that al-Houthi has become a focus of resistance after the testimony of Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah.
– Current conditions require Israel and the United States to revise the strategy of confrontation with Yemen. Study centers believe that they should focus on long -term war and expand attacks against Yemen by devastating blows against its infrastructure and targeting Ansarullah’s first -degree leaders so that they may eliminate internal solidarity among them. Attack on military infrastructure is another indicator of this strategy.
-US supporters and the Zionist regime believe that Washington should continue to pressure Riyadh so that it may be able to introduce the country into an international coalition against Yemen or at least behind the scenes.
– Entering Ansarullah Yemen’s name in the list of terrorist groups and imposing sanctions on the country and its party and commercial and official figures failed to make the slightest change in Ansarullah’s position in support of Gaza.
-Ansarullah’s empowerment after the first round of war, which lasted for more than a year, and its unpredictable military capabilities show that this movement may have other unprecedented surprises in the coming stages.
– despite allegations that Yemen’s Ansarullah dependence on Iran, most Western and Gulf writers and scholars believe that this movement is completely independent of Iran and makes its own decisions based on national and domestic features. Of course, these decisions are in political and military coordination with Iran and represent the two countries’ common understanding of the Western domination and the occupation of the Zionist regime and the necessity of confronting them.
