Trump’s cravings to create an American empire; from Canada’s accession to expanding borders

Mehr News Agency , International Group: US President Donald Trump, who returned to the White House in the final months of February, January 20, and took power for the second time. Some of these programs included the acquisition of Greenland, the recapture of the Panama Canal, the accession of Canada and Mexico, as well as the renaming of the Mexican Gulf to the US Gulf.

rename “Mexican Gulf” to “American Gulf”

US President Donald Trump issued an order to rename the “Gulf of Mexico” to the US Gulf in the early days of his second presidential term. The move was taken as part of his policies to “restore America’s greatness”.

After the order, the US Interior Ministry announced in a statement that the name of the Gulf of Mexico has officially changed to the US Gulf. Also, the name of the Denali Peak in Alaska was also returned to “Mount McKinley”.

Technology companies also updated the name of the Mexican Gulf in their map services. Google and Apple changed the name “Gulf of Mexico” to US Gulf users. These changes were applied to the services of GoogleM and Apple

This action has received different reactions. The President of Mexico, Claudia Shinbam, said the United States has no right to rename the Gulf of Mexico and is part of Mexico’s national identity. He also suggested that in response, the name of North America to “Mexican America”.

internationally, this renaming has not been officially accepted. International organizations such as the International Hydrography Organization continue to use the name of the “Gulf of Mexico”. Prepared news agencies have also referred to the renaming in their reports, but they still use the traditional name.

generally renamed the Mexican Gulf to the US Gulf by the US government, but it has no international acceptance and many countries and organizations still use the original name.

Canada as the fifty-one US state

last year, Trump has repeatedly proposed Canada’s annexation as the fifty-first US state. He believes that this can help improve the security and economy of both countries.

These statements have received sharp reactions from Canadian authorities. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau considered the proposal seriously and expressed concern about it. He emphasized that the Canadian -American border is unchanged and that these statements could damage the relations between the two countries.

also, the Canadian Finance Minister also stated that these statements were no longer considered a “joke” and aimed at “weakening” the closest US ally.

Analysts believe that the offer faces serious challenges. Among the cultural and economic differences, legal issues and internal opposition in both countries. Also, in order to join Canada to the United States, there is a need for the US Congress and the Canadian people’s satisfaction, which seems to be not possible at present.

proposal to join the US

Donald Trump also proposed Mexico’s accession to the United States last year. He expressed the idea for economic and security reasons and claimed that it could help improve the border conditions and combat drug cartels.

These statements have received negative reactions from Mexican officials and the international community. Many analysts consider this proposal unrealistic and stressful. Also, the move, which seems unlikely, could lead to increased tensions in the relations between the two countries.

Mexico’s accession to the United States is impossible politically, legally and socially impossible, as the people and the Mexican government strongly oppose their sovereignty, and such a move can lead to internal crises and even armed conflicts.

International law, this is a violation of Mexico’s territorial integrity and will face the reaction of the United Nations and other countries. Also, the economy and the government system of the two countries have fundamental differences, and acceptance of Mexico as new states requires widespread changes in American laws that Congress or American people are unlikely to agree.

Trump’s insistence on joining Greenland to America

US President always expressed his desire to join the United States last year. He claimed that the move was essential for international security and did not even reject the possibility of using military or economic power to convince Denmark.

These statements have received negative reactions from Danish and Greenland officials. Danish Prime Minister Drivorriksen emphasized that Greenland is not a sales. Also, European leaders criticized the statements and considered it a threat to the territorial integrity of Denmark.

Greenland is of high strategic, economic and military importance for America. The island is on the Arctic route and plays a key role in geopolitical competition with Russia and China, especially in terms of controlling new sea routes caused by polar ice melting.

Also, Greenland has rich reserves of rare minerals such as rare soil elements that are vital to American technology and military industries. From a military point of view, the Tule Air Base, the largest US base in the Arctic, is of particular importance for tracking ballistic missiles and Russian military activities.

However, it seems that the idea is facing serious political and diplomatic barriers and is very likely to be implemented in the current situation.

Trump’s uprising to recapture Panama Channel Control

Trump expresses the willingness to recapture the Panama Canal after re-entering the White House. He has always stated that the Panama Channel to the government and the people of Panama “was under conditions, and if the ethical and legal principles of this great gift are not followed, the US will want to complete the channel’s extradition to the United States.”

These statements were met with a sharp response from Panama officials. Panama President Jose Raul Molino emphasized that the Panama Canal is under Panama’s rule and that any attempt to change this situation is unacceptable. International analysts have interpreted these statements as part of Trump’s imperialist tendencies that could increase geopolitical tensions.

Panama is of great strategic importance to the United States, as the Panama Canal, which connects it to the Atlantic and Calm Ocean, has a vital role in international trade and US military operations. This channel, one of the most important arteries of global transportation, allows ships to bypass the long route around South America, which helps reduce costs and time of transportation. Also, because of its geographical location, Panama is a key point in monitoring security in strategic areas and countering military threats in the Western Hemisphere.

Trump’s statements about the Panama Canal’s recapture from Panama as a serious and executive action seems unlikely. This will not only face the strong opposition of the Panama government and its people, but also violates international law and national sovereignty. International contracts formed after World War II and with global agreements have consolidated Panama’s rule over the channel. In addition, other countries and international organizations will also oppose this kind of actions, as any effort to change the current situation can lead to diplomatic crisis and even military tensions.

Talk interest

In the same few months from Trump’s second term, his actions and statements about major changes in the North and South American political map, including the renaming of the Mexican Gulf to the US Gulf, attempt to join Canada and Mexico, and even the US Panjama It is global. These positions and actions have clearly raised concerns and negative reactions to neighboring countries and the international community. Many analysts see these statements not only non -unnecessary and unnecessary but also a threat to international relations and global norms.

While Trump puts these measures as a way to strengthen US power and security, the fact is that these ideas face serious legal, political and social barriers. Among these obstacles are the strong resistance of governments and the people of the target countries, cultural and economic differences, and legal and international challenges. In general, such actions cannot only be implemented rapidly, but if they continue, US relations with their neighbors may have serious and irreparable tensions.