The mystery of Qatargit; Do the Doha dollars conquered Tel Aviv’s policies?
, International Group : In recent weeks, the Zionist regime’s political space has faced a new wave of internal crises; This is a crisis that is not from the Palestinian resistance missiles, but from the loop of Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister of this regime, . The case called “ Qatargit, which has been investigating months ago, has now reached its peak and has unveiled a complex network of financial communication, media collusion and influence of foreign actors. The case not only questioned Netanyahu’s image, but has also raised serious questions about the role of regional mediator in Gaza’s security equations.
Qatargit; From financial scandal to security crisis
The story of Qatargit around the charges against two of Netanyahu’s senior advisers, Orich (Director former Likud party media) and Eli Field Style = “Text-align: Justify”> Advisor Master of the Prime Minister) rotates. The two are accused that by receiving financial funds from the Qatari government, the promoting Doha’s interests in Israeli media, enhancing the positive image of Qatar’s recent Gaza mediation and diminishing Egypt’s role as mediation. Based on the disclosed documents by Zionist security agencies, the defendants received large currencies through a complex network of American lobbies and Zionist businessmen active in the Persian Gulf, using their media influence.
The important point is the timing of these revelations; Netanyahu’s corruption courts are formed as the Zionist regime is still involved in the Gaza war and complex negotiations for the release of their captives. The case, initially under the ban on publication, has found the way by pressure from Netanyahu’s judicial institutions and media. .
Legal-Secretary details; From money laundering to contact with the external agent
Zionist and Shinbat (Homeland Security Organization) have made several charges against the defendants, citing the regime’s strict rules:
1. Contact with Foreign Affairs (Article 2 of the Penal Code): This article considers any direct or indirect connection with the external institutions of hostile or with the interests of Israel, even if tangible damage to internal security is not inflicted. The punishment of this crime is up to 5 years in prison and in cases such as espionage, life imprisonment.
۱. Money Laundering (Anti -Money Laundering Act): receive money from foreign sources without reporting to the competent authorities is a serious violation of this law.
1. Impact on Government Decisions: If you prove the payment of payments by changing the positions Tal Aviv in Qatar, the security file will be implemented.
Gale’s testimony Berger , Zionist businessman active in the Persian Gulf, is one of the main pillars of this case. He confessed to the request of Ji Futlick (American Lobby and Style = “Text-align: Justify”> Former Bill Clinton) has paid millions of dollars to Fieldstein . Lawyers Fieldstein although they confirm the receipt of money, but claim that these funds are solely for strategic and communication services to the Prime Minister’s office and have nothing to do with Qatar.
Netanyahu’s reaction; From denial to interference in security institutions
Netanyahu, who is not in charge of the charges, has accused the police and the police of “taking hostage hostage for political pressure” by issuing harsh statements. In his recent testimony in the court emphasized: “Qatar is not an enemy country, although it has no formal relations with Israel.” The claim comes as Tal Aviv previously introduced Qatar as a supporter of Hamas.
The Prime Minister of the Zionist regime even took unprecedented action to contain the revelations. He dismissed the cabinet last month with the support of the cabinet, Ronen Bar, the chief of Shinbet, but the Supreme Court of the Zionist regime issued an immediate order to dismiss him until the end of his career
Qatar statement; Declaration of charges and emphasis on cooperation with Egypt
The Qatari government called all the allegations “false and baseless” in a formal reaction, stressing in a statement: “The Qatari government has never paid for the efforts of Egyptian brothers or other mediators. These claims are in the service of Age of whose aim is to destroy the intermediary efforts and weaken the relationships between brother nations. Qatar continues to adhere to its human and diplomatic role in ending the war and continually collaborated with Egypt to achieve a permanent ceasefire. Mediation must stay away from any political . Priority is to reduce the suffering of the Palestinian people, protect civilians, and achieve a fair agreement based on doubles . ”
The statement, which was published in a diplomatic but decisive tone, shows that Doha seeks to maintain the as a key actor in the region’s equations.
consequences; From the internal crisis to the shakeness in regional equations
The case, like a political earthquake, has had widespread consequences for the Zionist regime and regional actors. In the internal dimension, the disclosure of corruption in the Prime Minister has exacerbated the crisis of the legitimacy of Netanyahu’s cabinet, and the opposition has called for the prime minister’s immediate resignation. On the other hand, this scandal has exposed foreign actors’ access to Tel Aviv decision centers and has raised concerns about the regime’s security permeability.
In the regional dimension, Qatar has a diplomatic statement to maintain the position of by publishing a diplomatic statement, but the continuation of controversy may reduce the confidence of the parties involved in the role of Doha. This is particularly sensitive when the Palestinian prisoners’ release talks are in a state of uncertainty, and any instability can lead to the prolongation of the war. On the other hand, Qatar and Egypt’s historic competition over the role of Gaza may be ignited in the shadow of these accusations; Even if both countries appear to be bilateral cooperation.
End of Speech
file Qatargit beyond a financial scandal, a window open to deep gaps in the Zionist regime governance system. It simultaneously engages three legal, political, and security fronts and raises questions about the transparency of Zionist institutions and the role of foreign lobbies in macro policy making. While the Zionist regime has not yet been shocked by October 9, Qatargit can become a factor in weakening the right-wing cabinet authority. On the other hand, Qatar’s reaction shows that Doha is trying to consolidate his diplomatic actor in the region by maintaining relations with Egypt and emphasizing humanitarian priorities. However, the continuation of the disclosure on this case may bring the complex equations into a new phase.
Hoda Yousefi; West Asian Issues Expert
