Get News Fast
Supporting the oppressed and war-torn people of Gaza and Lebanon

Global changes a factor influencing future negotiations on Ukraine conflict

The Ukraine Conflict Is No Longer Just About Ukraine; It’s a War Over‌ the‍ Future Global Order. The Choices Being Made Now Will Determine ⁤Whether the Outcome ‍Is a Realignment or‍ Long-term⁤ Collapse.

Mehr News Agency, International ‌Desk: Ukrainian thinker Andriy Buzarov has sent ⁢an exclusive article titled “Global ​Shifts as a Decisive factor in future ⁤Negotiations to End ‌the Ukraine‍ Conflict” to mehr News Agency’s International Desk. The full text ⁢follows:

two‍ centuries ago, Carl von⁢ Clausewitz ‌ stated:‌ “War is the continuation⁢ of politics by other means.” Since then, much⁣ has changed in the world. ⁤Today, the political behavior of ⁤global​ actors⁢ is‌ itself a continuation of war—a war waged through modern-era tools in the realm of ideas, economic ‍competition, and cyberspace.

The profound⁤ shift of global economies toward the‍ Fourth Industrial Revolution, dominated ⁤by advanced computing technologies and new energy systems, has disrupted⁣ customary ​power poles across demographics ​and ⁢finance. global South economies are ⁤growing at an ⁢accelerating pace, while former world⁢ leaders—now mired in crisis—refuse to relinquish their positions.

If we align this technological transition⁢ timeline with major military conflicts,‍ we⁣ see ‍they occur almost ‌simultaneously.‍ During such periods,economies ⁣face critical recessions—and⁢ our‌ era is no exception. The world stands on the brink⁣ of a⁢ global ‌economic⁣ crisis, and key players sense ⁢it. To survive,​ they seek market ‌expansion and geopolitical influence—a ⁤pattern ‌unchanged since humanity’s earliest transitions from‍ forests to plains ⁤and primitive agriculture.

This trend is especially evident in societies with imperial ⁢legacies: ⁤

  • China through its ​Belt &⁣ Road Initiative⁣
  • Turkey expanding‌ into the​ Middle⁣ East ‍
  • america via tariff wars
  • Russia building ‌its sphere‍ of influence

Their scramble for resources ahead ‌of hard times defines⁣ their ⁣interests, political tools—and clashes.

The New Great Game

Trump pursued “Great America” by⁤ claiming Greenland ​& Panama Canal rights while launching tariff wars against China + half the world—pressuring Europe for human/tech resources extraction.

Britain intervenes in ⁤Ukraine/Middle East seeking dominance ⁣over Eastern Europe; Israel expands into ⁤neighboring lands; Russia​ builds its‌ “security⁣ buffer zone”; ‌EU counters⁣ Russian territorial/economic expansion.

These⁣ factors turn Ukraine negotiations into an equation ⁣with countless⁢ variables today: Russia/US aren’t negotiating Ukraine’s future⁢ but debating the structure of a new world order. Key players include:

1)⁤ Europe: In deep ⁤crisis using Ukraine as leverage vs Russia + Trump’s “Great ⁣America”.⁤
2) China: Anticipating US market losses pivots toward ⁤Europe (unacceptable to Washington).
3) Britain: Seeks Baltic-Poland-Romania‌ influence via ‍Intermarium project.

Core Interests:

1) United ⁤States

New US⁤ doctrines declare “China, not Russia,” as ​top‌ threat;⁢ Trump shifts focus toward⁣ Indo-Pacific ⁤(Europe⁤ deprioritized).

2) Russia

Aims preventing Eastern Europe ⁤becoming Western military/economic containment bases seeks equal global power​ status requiring neutrality/control over Eastern Europe ​today Caucasus/central⁢ Asia tomorrow sanctions lifted ⁢for growth stability.

3) China

Preparing ⁣post-US conflict logistics Eurasian-wide exploiting EU ‍energy shortages industrial ⁣decline acquiring tech ‍replacing US investments expanding africa presence.

4) ⁣European Union

With fading US security guarantees‌ EU seeks‌ new stability ‍tools Hungary/Slovakia defying Brussels ⁤fuels fears‍ UK meddling destabilizes ​policies.

Human Factors ‍Influencing Conflict:

1) Trump needs tangible pre-election wins.
2) Kremlin wants conflict end ⁢via ⁤new security framework.
3) Zelensky regime heavily reliant on European/British partners.


Three Likely Scenarios for Ukraine:

1️⃣ U.S Forces European ​Compromise

Washington pressures EU/UK drop support Zelensky signs peace recognizing ‌annexations⁢ hurdle Moscow may demand‍ elections delegitimizing him

2️⃣ U.S⁤ Prioritizes Deal With⁤ Russia Over⁢ Kyiv

strategic pact announced​ sanctions eased aid ​cut⁣ Ukrainian forces collapse without western arms lose more land ⁣face‍ harsher terms

3️⃣ ​U.S Retreats⁣ – Europe Fights On⁣

Talks stall continued⁢ EU/UK backing but weapons shortages manpower depletion ‍merely ‍delay Scenario #2 worst ⁤outcome ‍catastrophic losses infrastructure destruction western regions potentially voting join ‌Poland/Romania


Hidden Risk ⁤Of⁤ Scenario #3:

Prolonged defeats‌ could push Ukrainian officials/military toward destabilizing acts like reselling Western arms terrorists/criminals (reported analysts/intel ‌agencies).‍ Interpol chief Jürgen ​stock warns black-market proliferation even SBU confirmed colonel sold US missiles Russians media reports weapons surfacing Turkey ‌Syria ‍etc ⁤escalating ‍global​ terror threats conflict zones casualties ⁢


Conclusion:

Most likely now? Scenario #1 ​despite White ‌House rhetoric talks continue least damaging path failed negotiations would inflame tensions‍ across Europe middle ‌East South Caucasus⁣ international community must⁤ prevent‍ Scenario #3 second-most probable

Ukraine’s conflict no longer just about borders it’s ⁣shaping tomorrow’s world order choices today decide between⁣ negotiated ⁣realignment or protracted collapse⁣ with worldwide⁤ fallout

free zones of Iran, heaven for investment | 741 investment packages in Iran's free zones | With a capacity of over 158 billion dollars Safe investment in the Islamic Republic of Iran
Back to top button