Get News Fast
Supporting the oppressed and war-torn people of Gaza and Lebanon

US Pushes to Prolong Syria Presence; Counterterrorism Claims Dismissed as Pretext

An American magazine has questioned U.S.policy in Syria, stating that despite the shift in Syria’s governance, Washington has‍ no intention⁤ of ‌ending its military presence in the country.

According to a report by ‍ webangah News Agency,citing ⁤The Intercept,the U.S. magazine‌ published an article‍ asserting that America does not plan‌ to withdraw its troops ⁢from Syria even as political control shifts within ​the nation.

The Pentagon confirmed that Washington’s ⁤new⁣ policy toward ⁣Damascus does not⁣ include ending its⁣ occupation⁤ of Syrian territory.‌ Currently, approximately 1,000⁣ U.S. troops remain stationed in Syria.

The U.S. military has‍ operated in Syria⁣ for years as ⁢part of its complex⁤ and ofen⁢ confusing regional strategy. Late last ‌year,‌ Bashar al-Assad’s government was overthrown following a swift offensive by rebel forces led by Abu Mohammad al-Julani. Recent reports indicate that the U.S. ⁤is closing three of its eight small military bases in Syria.

Experts argue‍ that while the withdrawal from a handful of ⁣bases has been delayed for some time,it remains essential for ⁤any meaningful shift in America’s regional strategy​ and policy.

“Over 1,000 American troops remain stuck in Syria with ⁢no clear mission or timeline⁢ for their return,” said Rosemary Kalinik, Middle‌ East ‍program director at Defense⁣ Priorities.​ “These forces are ​remnants of the war‌ against ISIS-but ISIS was defeated over five ⁤years ago and lost all its territory. It’s time for these soldiers to come home.”

When asked whether the U.S. intends to withdraw from Syria entirely, a Pentagon spokesperson⁢ stated last April: “The American ⁣presence⁤ will decrease to‍ fewer than 1,000 troops but will not end completely.”

“Fear of an ISIS resurgence has long been ​used as justification,” Kalinik added, “but recent history in ​Afghanistan proves such claims false-America doesn’t need ground ⁣forces to counter any potential reemergence.”

In her interview with The intercept, she noted: “The ⁣primary argument for staying‍ in Afghanistan was ⁤preventing terrorism⁤ from groups like al-Qaeda or ISIS-yet these groups ‍never directly targeted americans there.”

“Keeping troops in ⁢Syria exposes them to retaliatory attacks,” ‍Kalinik concluded. “It’s almost like handing hostages over⁢ to America’s enemies-ready targets whenever they choose.”

News Sources: © ⁢webangah News Agency‌
English channel of the webangah news agency on Telegram
Back to top button