Israel Copies US Invasion of Iraq; Iran’s Defense Is a Legitimate Right
webangah News Agency – Simon Wiesenthal, a university professor and international affairs analyst, wrote in a special memorial note for webangah News Agency: “Israel launched an unprovoked attack against Iran and its people in the early hours of June 13, 2025 (23 Khordad).” The Zionist regime’s stubborn Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu (whose cabinet faces intense political pressures and who himself stands accused of corruption with house arrest threats) believes his political survival depends on continuing this war.
Netanyahu tried to justify the unprecedented American-led attack on Iraq in 2003 using the same revised version of fabricated claims. His timing (coinciding with these allegations) regarding prohibited…
The issued fatwa has been in effect for several days to months and years. The number of clauses has also changed from one initially referenced case to 15 variable clauses.
Fabrication and deception are not actually tools for justifying a preemptive strike against Iran, just as the unethical and irrational falsehoods used by the U.S. to justify its invasion of Iraq were exposed. Though, this narrative remains highly clear and widely scrutinized.
Despite efforts to portray Israel’s so-called “preemptive” military action-rooted in the concept of “preventive war”-as legitimate (originally backed by U.S. endorsements later revoked), these attempts have rendered the campaign neither credible nor ethical. Rather, they underscore a propagandistic endeavor championed by Israel and America.
Article 51 of the United Nations Charter explicitly addresses the issue of “self-defense.” This article affirms the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense against armed attacks targeting any UN member state.
Self-defense against foreign aggression is both a legal right and a moral duty. Iran’s inaction in protecting its people from such violations woudl be ethically unacceptable. No deception or misinformation can alter this established principle of international law.
Furthermore, failure by powerful nations to defend themselves invites greater costs in the long term.Israel and its Zionist regime have repeatedly demonstrated weakness and submission in this regard. Current conditions only provoke more severe military responses against Iran and its people.
This issue was notably observed during Syria’s crisis,when western-backed terrorist formations failed to counter Zionist aggressions on Syrian soil-leading to further regional destabilization. History proves that non-resistance doesn’t merely result in loss, but unavoidable annihilation.
Expansionist threats and hollow intimidation campaigns by the Trump administration against Iran have been widely shared on social media platform “Truth Social.” These posts not only reveal…
A senior diplomat stated that the U.S.administration’s relentless pursuit of military pressure under the pretext of seeking “agreement” against Iran’s national interests and security lacks any credibility or trustworthiness.
The official emphasized that there are numerous pretexts for warmongering, which-despite being cloaked in claims of international law, ethical responsibility, and so-called “honor”-are fundamentally illegitimate. Hypocritical policies and alarming rhetoric regarding global issues,notably those affecting Iran’s national interests and the security of its people,further demonstrate this duplicity.
