Netanyahu’s Goal in War with Iran Was to Stay in Power; U.S. Influence Declines
webangah News Agency – Ursula Asta, an Argentinian geopolitical expert, contextualizes Israel’s actions within a broader Western project to preserve hegemony and delay the erosion of U.S.-led unipolarity. Highlighting Israel’s political fragility and neoconservative influence in U.S. policymaking, she argues that targeted assassinations and hostilities against Iran stem not from security concerns but from efforts to weaken the Axis of Resistance and block Tehran’s integration into a multipolar world order.
Recent weeks have seen overt Israeli aggression against Iran and its people. Why does this regime commit such crimes against defenseless civilians in Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran? What drives its escalation?
Netanyahu has multiple motives for provoking war with Iran-a conflict now directly involving the U.S., which previously limited itself to backing Israel politically. His weakening legal standing and unstable coalition make military confrontation a tool for political survival.
Strategically, Iran obstructs Israel’s expansionist ambitions.Meanwhile, Trump-era U.S. administrations-heavily influenced by Zionist lobbies and neoconservatives-view Israeli dominance as key to controlling West Asia.
Israel claims its strikes target Iranian nuclear facilities yet bombs hospitals, infrastructure, and media centers-killing women and children. How do you explain this contradiction?
Israel systematically sabotages nuclear diplomacy between Tehran and washington. Evidence from suspended negotiations confirms this agenda was later reframed as regime-change advocacy under false nonproliferation pretenses.
The UN has documented Israeli war crimes extensively-why does the West still provide military-political support?
The “Greater Israel” project aligns with neoconservative “American Century” doctrines seeking regional control to revive declining U.S.global primacy-evident since Bush-era invasions of Afghanistan/Iraq.</P
“We’re experiencing World war III piecemeal,” Pope Francis observed.This reflects Western elites’ anxiety over Eurasia’s power shift away from their geopolitical interests.Israel serves as their regional fortress.</P
Western media frames Israeli attacks as self-defense while ignoring civilian massacres.How can this bias be countered?</P
The so-called Iron Dome’s failures reveal paradoxes: those claiming victory mourn at home.Media monopolies dominate South America too,yet option platforms increasingly challenge mainstream narratives through investigative rigor.Technological progress also exposes atrocities via social media,making denial untenable during crises like Gaza’s humanitarian catastrophe.</P
What are israel’s long-term expansionist goals,and how do they threaten neighbors?</P
The Middle east’s tilt toward BRICS challenges Western primacy.Iran-Saudi rapprochement mediated by China,Iran-Russia strategic pacts,and SCO expansions signal this transition.israel wages war precisely to halt these irreversible trends in a hydrocarbon-rich region central to emerging multipolarity.
* * *
Astareiterates:*“Human costs must anchor geopolitical analysis.Each life lost exposes strategic hypocrisy.”Gaza’s genocide demands global action.Israel blocks aid while targeting journalists to suppress truth.
U.S.vetoes shield Israeli crimes,but American decline manifests economically(massive military spending,trade wars)and institutionally(NATO strains).Multipolarity is now operational;unipolarity collapses under imperial overreach.
* * *
onnuclear hypocrisy:*
Iran remains Israel’spregional nemesis as 1979.Tel Aviv sabotaged 2015 JCPOA talks precisely because IAEA oversight doesn’t constrain its own illegal arsenal.Post-WWII international mechanisms require urgent reform amid concurrent Eurasian conflicts(Ukraine,Taiwan)-all linkedtoU.S.hegemony’seclipse.
