Netanyahu’s Goal in War with Iran Was to Stay in Power; U.S. Influence Declines
webangah News Agency – Ursula Asta, an Argentinian geopolitical analyst, interprets Israel’s actions as part of a broader Western project to sustain hegemony and prevent the erosion of U.S.-led unipolarity. Highlighting Israel’s political fragility and the influence of neoconservatives in Washington,she argues that Tel Aviv’s aggression toward Iran stems not from security concerns but from efforts to weaken the Axis of Resistance and block Tehran’s integration into a multipolar world order.
Recent weeks have seen overt Israeli aggression against Iran and its people. Why does this regime commit such crimes against defenseless civilians in Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran? What drives its escalation?
Netanyahu has multiple motives for provoking war with Iran-a conflict now directly involving the U.S., which had previously only defended Israel politically.His weakening legal standing and unstable coalition make war a tool for political survival. Strategically,Iran obstructs Israel’s expansionist ambitions while U.S. domestic turmoil empowers Zionist lobbies seeking regional control.
Israel claims to target Iran’s nuclear program yet bombs hospitals, infrastructure, and media centers-killing women and children. How do you explain this contradiction?
Israel systematically sabotages nuclear negotiations between tehran and Washington while conflating nonproliferation with regime-change rhetoric.
Despite UN documentation of Israeli war crimes, Western nations continue military-political support. Why this silence?
The Trump administration housed neoconservatives who championed greater israel as part of America’s ”New Century Project”-a bid to reassert fading global dominance through Middle East control.
“We are experiencing World War III piecemeal,” Pope Francis observed astutely amid shifting Afro-Eurasian power dynamics where Israel serves as a Western fortress.
Western media frames Israeli actions as self-defense while ignoring civilian massacres. How can this bias be countered?
The mythic Iron Dome proves fallible; those claiming victory mourn instead of celebrating at home despite controlling narratives across hemispheres like South America where option media struggles for balance amid tech-driven exposure of atrocities once suppressed by mainstream outlets.
The Long Game: BRICS vs Unipolarity
Iran-Saudi rapprochement mediated by China exemplifies regional realignment toward emerging powers challenging Western primacy-with BRICS expansions including Egypt/UAE accelerating structural shifts even SCO members Russia/China deepen ties via energy-infrastructure pacts with Tehran.
Meanwhile blocking humanitarian aid constitutes another front in hybrid warfare where journalists die so truths distort-yet hypocrisy laid bare when nuclear-armed Tel Aviv vilifies monitored states under IAEA scrutiny it evades itself since 1979 revolution marked Islamic Republic becoming Zionism’s chief regional foe.
Three concurrent Eurasian conflicts (Ukraine-NATO-Russia tensions/Taiwan flashpoints/Mideast volatility) reflect American hegemony unraveling through imperial overreach contradicting postwar multilateral frameworks now obsolete before emergent orders demanding accountability beyond veto shields abused at UNSC sessions masking decline behind militarized budgets/tariff wars on competitors like beijing whose rise anchors multipolar inevitability.
