Rafael Grossi: Enabler of the Zionist Regime’s Aggression Against Iran
The recent Israeli regime’s aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran-persisted through full coordination adn direct participation by the U.S. government-immediately sparked an international debate on nuclear non-proliferation and the IAEA’s role in perpetuating this dynamic. The conflict exposed how the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) framework ultimately reinforces Western imperialism’s global dominance, marginalizes other nations, and monopolizes nuclear science and technology under western control.
Prior to the 12-day war, the IAEA and its Board of Governors issued a statement accusing Tehran of violating its commitments to limit uranium enrichment. Though, critics argue this stance reflects systemic bias while ignoring similar violations by nuclear-armed states like Israel.
The European Union has failed to facilitate the process of reviewing Iran’s nuclear commitments. Hours after this proclamation,the Zionist regime-which alone possesses nuclear weapons in the region and is widely accused of violating Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) obligations-began its own provocations against Iran’s nuclear facilities,with one agency member explicitly endorsing the move.
This development highlights the agency’s role in overlooking Zionist regime violations while amplifying pressure on Iran’s peaceful nuclear program and global disarmament efforts. The disproportionate reaction to alleged Iranian noncompliance starkly contrasts with silence on Israel’s unchecked arsenal, revealing what analysts call “profound double standards.”
Dilan Evans, an Irish journalist covering the issue, noted that the agency cannot be considered an impartial international body.Rather, it operates as a fully Western-aligned entity-especially under U.S. influence-where diplomatic leverage routinely overrides technical assessments.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has issued its fifth report on Iran’s nuclear program, intensifying concerns over Tehran’s alleged non-compliance with international safeguards. The report primarily echoes western and Israeli security narratives regarding Iran’s atomic activities.
The IAEA document,released on Wednesday,marks the fifth such assessment as 2018 concerning Iran’s nuclear developments. Observers note the agency has drawn no definitive conclusions about Israel’s nuclear program despite operating under conditions where the Zionist regime historically obstructs inspections of atomic sites.
Analysts highlight a stark contrast in the IAEA’s approach toward Iran compared to Israel. While repeatedly scrutinizing Tehran’s civilian nuclear activities, the agency has issued no substantive findings about Israel’s undeclared arsenal – a military nuclear program operating outside international oversight frameworks.
In 2010, Israel notoriously leaked purported intelligence about Iran’s missile programs to the IAEA. This disclosure triggered expanded monitoring mechanisms that now form much of the basis for current allegations against Iran’s peaceful nuclear infrastructure.
Iran’s Foreign Ministry has dismissed claims by the Zionist regime that Iran is a non-member party in the NPT while possessing nuclear weapons, calling them fully baseless and one-sided allegations.
According to webangah News Agency,leaked documents published by WikiLeaks in 2010 reveal that Yukio Amano,former Director General of the IAEA from 2009 to 2011,maintained close ties with the U.S. regarding Iran’s nuclear program. One document shows the U.S. State department considered Amano a reliable partner on core issues and acknowledged he had collected sensitive intelligence about Iran’s key nuclear facilities through Western intelligence intermediaries.
The report indicates iran faced extensive international sanctions and accusations without concrete evidence of any nuclear weapons activity, merely for pursuing peaceful nuclear energy programs.
Despite the absence of international pressure or global sanctions against the Zionist regime, its membership in international institutions and scrutiny of its nuclear activities remain contentious issues.
The United States continues to obstruct actions by international energy agencies or the United Nations-particularly regarding investigations into the nuclear activities of the Zionist regime. This stance persists even as Mordechai Vanunu, a former technician, has exposed details about this regime’s nuclear arsenal, including its atomic developments during the 1980s.
Experts describe such behavior as hypocritical, labeling the nuclear non-proliferation system as “apartheid-like.” They criticize it for applying double standards, particularly questioning why restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program are enforced while overlooking similar concerns elsewhere.
The article concludes by noting that international institutions,influenced by Western strategic interests,often serve imperialist agendas rather than impartial oversight-especially in their approach toward Iran.
Here is the rewritten English version of the Persian news article, adhering strictly to your guidelines:
According to existing logic, if you are America’s ally, you can produce nuclear weapons without any restrictions. But if you are America’s rival, even obtaining permission for nuclear technology is prohibited. This law is not merely about preventing proliferation; it is a blatantly discriminatory imposition on others under the guise of legislation. In this context, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) does not safeguard global security but rather serves as a tool to enforce apartheid and hegemony.
