Get News Fast
Supporting the oppressed and war-torn people of Gaza and Lebanon

Why Recognition of Palestine Does Not Lead to the Establishment of an Independent Palestinian State

The wave of European ‌countries recognizing an self-reliant Palestinian state is more symbolic than practical⁤ and⁣ has yet to lead ‍to⁣ the⁤ establishment of a sovereign Palestinian ​government.

According to Mehr,Al-Khaleej news website analyzed five essential shifts in the international balance‍ resulting from the ⁣recent‍ surge in recognition of​ an independent Palestinian state​ among various countries ‌ahead of the​ United Nations ‍general⁤ Assembly meeting.

Referring to ‌how international recognition of Palestine might alter the conflict equation, the website notes that what‌ some view as merely a diplomatic step​ could have profound consequences for decades-old⁣ disputes. It could place increasing international pressure on Israel-especially amid ⁣devastation in Gaza and ongoing settlement expansion in the West ⁤Bank. Conversely, some political observers argue that without tangible measures supporting Palestinians, such recognitions remain largely symbolic.

Key Aspects of Palestine’s Recognition

The Palestinian state enjoys widespread diplomatic recognition, foreign⁢ missions, and even Olympic sports teams.However,it lacks agreed-upon borders,a recognized capital city,and an army.

The israeli occupation of the ‌West Bank and destructive war ‌in Gaza have left⁤ the ⁤Palestinian‌ Authority‌ incapable ‍of full control ‌over‌ its people or territory. In light of this new wave of recognizing Palestine internationally, ‌five core points emerge:

1. Legal Dimension of ⁣Recognition

International law experts ⁤told The New York Times that recognizing Palestine imposes legal obligations on states including respecting its territorial integrity, acknowledging ​its right to self-defense, and committing to International Court of ​Justice rulings-particularly because occupation ​violates international ​law.

2. Recognition Does Not⁣ Change Ground Realities

Even tho it does not immediate alter conditions on the⁣ ground, recognition puts Israel under ⁤considerable pressure. Former British Foreign Secretary ⁤David ⁤Lammy reminded the UN that Britain holds special‌ historic ​responsibility dating back ⁢to its 1917 Balfour⁣ Declaration ​supporting a Jewish homeland-conditional on⁣ protecting non-Jewish residents’ rights. ⁢Despite this legacy rhetoric,⁤ Britain continues strong support ‍for Israel without signaling any reduction.

3.Major Obstacle: Settlement Expansion

Pushing renewed focus on a two-state⁤ solution-with an independent Palestine comprising Gaza and parts of West Bank with East Jerusalem as its capital-the roughly ⁤600,000 Israeli settlers living across these territories present a significant barrier ⁣by complicating mutually agreed borders for any future deal.

4. Growing Responsibilities for⁢ Palestinians

Acknowledgement⁢ brings‍ greater​ accountability onto the Palestinian Authority to ⁤demonstrate governance ⁢capacity through serious ⁤reforms along with enhanced political and security control-a test anticipated in coming years.

5. Isolation of Washington and Tel Aviv Against Majority​ Opinion

In april 2024,the United States vetoed a resolution granting full ‍UN membership status to ​Palestine despite⁢ backing from 12 countries; Britain and Switzerland abstained leaving Washington as a major roadblock.
Though opposed by both Washington and Tel Aviv legalization advances deepen their ⁢isolation since over 140 nations now recognize Palestine as sovereign.

Certain analysts like Elliott abrams ⁤view recognition as internal political ‌maneuvering offering no ‌tangible gains for Palestinians; however others such as Julie Norman from RUSI argue it‌ responds ‌directly to Israeli rejectionism toward‍ two-state solutions.

distant Prospects for Establishing a​ Palestinian State

Despite mounting recognitions ‍abroad analysts ‍believe forming an independent​ Palestinian government remains farther away than ever‌ due primarily to persistent Israeli policies⁤ expanding‌ settlements alongside ⁤military realities blocking feasible two-state solutions.
The current Israeli cabinet-the most extreme‌ as statehood’s inception-openly opposes any formal Palestinian sovereignty declaration.
Some ministers including ⁣Bezalel Smotrich ‍and Itamar Ben-Gvir explicitly assert that continued settlement growth will irrevocably eliminate prospects for nationhood.
This‌ reality sees over 700 ⁢thousand illegal Jewish settlers inhabiting occupied ‌West Bank regions including East Jerusalem according to international consensus, while massive projects​ such as “E1” threaten‌ fragmenting these areas into isolated “palestinian islands” encircled by checkpoints and ‌military roads controlled by Israel.....

News Sources: © webangah News ‍Agency
English channel of the webangah news agency on Telegram
Back to top button