Risks of U.S. Resolution for Gaza Administration; Resistance’s Possible Scenarios
According to the English section of webangah News Agency, citing Mehr news Agency and Al Jazeera, concerns are rising over the violation of Palestinian rights following the US-backed resolution on Gaza at the Security Council. International arrangements focus on disarming Palestinian resistance thru a transitional international administration with broad powers.These arrangements also link the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza to stabilizing security in the enclave, implying that Israeli occupiers will remain a security actor in Palestine. This raises multiple questions about how resistance groups will respond to this resolution’s consequences in the coming phase.
The Risks Posed by the US Resolution for Gaza
Despite claims that Washington’s resolution aims to reinforce ceasefire agreements and ease humanitarian aid restrictions entering Gaza, Wassim Afifa, an Arab political analyst and writer, warns it carries serious risks including:
- The internationalization of Gaza for an extended period under what is called a “Peace Council,” as outlined in former president Donald Trump’s plan.
- The dismantling of Palestinian authority by disarming resistance factions.
- The return of the Palestinian Authority to Gaza under foreign-imposed conditions-meaning any progress toward establishing a sovereign Palestinian state or ensuring full sovereignty would be indefinitely postponed without clear timelines.
Although eight Arab and islamic countries openly support this resolution as a pathway toward forming a Palestinian state, Afifa asserts that thier backing effectively grants ethical and political legitimacy to undermining palestinians’ rights.
Palestinian national groups have warned about these dangers,describing the resolution as an attempt to impose international guardianship over Gaza while endorsing a biased stance favoring Zionist interests. They stress that discussions around resistance weapons must occur within an internal political process guaranteeing an end to occupation, establishment of an autonomous Palestine, and Palestinians’ right to self-determination.
Scenarios for Resistance’s Response to Washington’s Project Against Gaza
Aimaf Afifa outlines response scenarios from palestinian resistance against Washington’s project concerning Gaza:
- Nationwide delegitimization-both politically within Palestine-to emphasize that this externally imposed resolution lacks broad national consensus among Palestinians and does not represent any binding framework for their future or vision.
- Launching an inclusive national path addressing challenges arising post-resolution while rebuilding Palestine’s legitimacy based on its past rights and ongoing resistance efforts.
Iyyad al-Qarraa, another prominent Palestinian political analyst, highlights that Palestinians’ insistence on rejecting any clauses concerning disarmament before ending occupation reflects their firm stance. He notes these groups are also working actively to rally Arab states’ support against Israeli regime plans.
