Dimensions of the approach of America and the Zionist regime in Gaza

report Mehr News, the news site of “Al-Zitouneh” study center, in an article examines the American behavior during the last six months of the Gaza war and writes that the United States has extensively and at a high level in the last six months He managed the Al-Aqsa storm war in Gaza and participated as a full partner of the Zionist regime in this war of aggression.

Despite being preoccupied with managing the Russian case and the war in Ukraine, as well as competing with China, the American government felt compelled to once again strongly enter into regional conflicts. , because he felt the organization of security, military and economic structures in the region that he had designed before; It is on the verge of collapse.

Despite the gaps that can be seen in the positions of the American President Joe Biden’s administration and the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet, and despite the differences in the details There is a process of war and its management, so far there has been no disagreement about the goals of this war. The differences that have temporarily arisen between America and the Zionist regime, and some of them are of a personal nature, have not reached a level that can be considered as differences between America and Israel.

In the continuation of this article, Al-Zitoune tried to analyze the political components of America in the behavior of this country and its positions towards the Gaza war and examine the imminent and predictable approaches of the United States until the time of its establishment. draw the presidential elections in this country at the end of this year.

First: America’s behavior in dealing with the Gaza war

The behavioral components of America and the practical activities of this country regarding the Gaza war can be listed in the following cases:

1- Providing full and unlimited help and support to the positions of the Zionist regime and providing for Tel Aviv’s demands for the continuation of the political, military and economic war and full cooperation with all the declared goals. Israel from war.

2- Complete acceptance of the narrative of the Zionist regime and giving the green light to this regime regarding the start of the war and its continuation and justifying Israel’s barbaric crimes in Gaza and denying the attribution of this Crimes against Israel. The American government has also tried to deny the actions of the Zionist regime as a violation of international or humanitarian laws and reject the accusations against this regime.

3- Sending American warships to the region to emphasize full support for the Zionist regime and try to prevent the direct intervention of Iran and its regional allies in this war until In this way, the Zionist regime can gain the necessary time to implement its goals in Gaza and prevent the spread of war in the region.

4- Providing the necessary cover for Zionist aggression and defeating the issuance of Security Council resolutions condemning Israel and forcing this regime to a permanent and sustainable ceasefire. In this regard, the United States has used its right of veto against Security Council resolutions three times.

6- Increasing pressure on Arab and Islamic countries, the Arab League and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation to refrain from issuing strong political resolutions against the Zionist regime and to make extensive efforts to convince Arab parties to participate in the future security structure considered by the Zionists in Gaza.

7- Constantly calling on the Zionist regime to allow humanitarian aid to enter Gaza and avoid targeting civilians and reducing the number of casualties among its soldiers in As much as possible, without criticizing or condemning the ongoing crimes of the Zionist regime against civilians and destroying infrastructure, hospitals, schools, mosques, and churches with American weapons and missiles.

8- Carrying out humanitarian aid heliborne operations in Gaza with the aim of improving the image of America in humanitarian terms and starting the effort to build a port in front of the coast of Gaza to provide the means of entry Humanitarian aid.

9- Invitation to start the political process based on the solution of forming two governments. While America knows that there is no chance for the success of this political process; Because the Israelis strongly oppose the establishment of the Palestinian state and this issue is included in the approvals of the synagogue of the Zionist regime.

10- Continuing the efforts to advance the normalization of relations between Saudi Arabia and the Zionist regime and overcoming the obstacles that have emerged as a result of the Gaza war. In this regard, the Americans sign a joint defense agreement with the Saudis and are going to equip Riyadh with nuclear facilities for peaceful purposes. They have also promised to try to establish a Palestinian state within the framework of the two-state solution.

Second: points of agreement and disagreement in the views of America and the Zionist regime:

Since the beginning of the Gaza war, the Americans have fully supported the goals of the Zionist regime in this war, including in the field of achieving military victory and eliminating the Palestinian resistance and preventing the conversion They showed it as a threat against Israel’s security, as well as an attempt to free Israeli prisoners and change the political situation of the Gaza Strip and end the rule of Hamas in it.

Nevertheless, the two sides had differences of opinion regarding some details of the war management, and the American democratic government criticized the behavior of Netanyahu and his cabinet and some extreme right-wing leaders in It has occupied territories. One of the most important of these criticisms was when US President Joe Biden emphasized that Netanyahu is acting to the detriment of this regime rather than benefiting Israel. He criticized Netanyahu’s management of the Gaza war.

Chuck Schumer, the leader of the Democratic majority in the US Senate, also criticized Netanyahu in the middle of last March and accused him of becoming an obstacle to compromise and giving up. The demands of the extremist elements of Israel have become Schumer called for early elections in Israel and emphasized that Netanyahu’s cabinet is no longer suitable for meeting the demands of this regime.

The points of disagreement between the American government and the cabinet of the Zionist regime can be listed in the following cases:

1- Disagreement regarding the movement that can take over the administration of this region after the end of the Gaza war. The American government believes that the self-governing organization should accept this responsibility as the only Palestinian side along with the United States and the Zionist regime by making some reforms. They also support the Arab multinational power to manage the security situation in the Gaza Strip. Netanyahu’s cabinet, however, has a negative stance towards the future role of the self-governing organizations in the management of Gaza and believes that a regional method for the management of Gaza should be provided, consisting of prominent tribal figures. The security officials of this regime have also met with some of the sheikhs they want, but these meetings were not fruitful.

2- The dispute regarding the management of the prisoner exchange case and the transaction in this regard. Meanwhile, Benjamin Netanyahu’s behavior and his practical positions do not show any attempt to make a new deal for the release of Israeli prisoners in exchange for a six-week ceasefire. During the past weeks, Netanyahu has taken strict positions that have led to the halt of the negotiations, he even refuses to give the necessary powers to the Israeli negotiating team. Meanwhile, the American side is insisting that this deal be done and is putting pressure on the Qatari and Egyptian mediators to continue their efforts.

3- Disagreement regarding Israel’s re-occupation of Gaza and its long-term stay in this area. America has expressed its opposition to the views presented by Netanyahu’s cabinet in this regard. Nevertheless, the Biden government has not shown any opposition to the temporary presence of the Zionist regime in Gaza to meet the goals of the war, but it does not want this presence to lead to a complete occupation in Gaza.

4- Disagreement in the size and timing of the massive military attack on Rafah: While Netanyahu’s cabinet shows a strange enthusiasm for this attack and It claims that this attack can paralyze the military capabilities of Hamas and achieve the goals of the war for Israel, and in a situation where it claims that the failure to implement this step means the victory of Hamas in the war, the American government is trying to postpone this attack. Biden asked the Israeli side to provide guarantees to prevent massive human casualties as a result of the high concentration of citizens in Rafah. The Americans have presented other options for attacking Hamas and the resistance and eliminating its leaders, and they believe that with these options it will be possible to avoid the wide consequences of a possible attack on Rafah.

5- Disagreement regarding the duration of the war: While Netanyahu is trying to continue the war indefinitely and until the complete victory is achieved and the targets, advance their aggressions; The US government believes that Netanyahu’s personal calculations and his fear of being tried for the failure of the September 7 attack have made him seek refuge in extending the war and does not want to accept the fact that the goals of the war have not been achieved. Of course, the Americans have made a relative change in their positions regarding the permanent ceasefire in Gaza, and this issue was raised in the draft presented in the Security Council – of course, based on the framework intended by the United States – which was vetoed by Russia, China, and Algeria.

6- Public disputes regarding the forced migration of Palestinians out of Gaza. The Zionist cabinet had considered such a plan at the beginning of the war, but it was abandoned due to Egypt’s opposition and the closing of the Rafah crossing. At first, the Americans did not express their opposition to this plan, but when Egypt and Jordan announced their opposition to it, the American political discourse also moved towards the opposition to the plan of forced migration of the Palestinians.

To be continued…